btrfs: inode-item: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty()
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument. These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c7763312c
commit
212e5f5cb8
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -298,8 +298,6 @@ static int btrfs_insert_inode_extref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
|
||||
ptr = (unsigned long)&extref->name;
|
||||
write_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], name->name, ptr, name->len);
|
||||
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
btrfs_free_path(path);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -363,8 +361,6 @@ int btrfs_insert_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
|||
ptr = (unsigned long)(ref + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
write_extent_buffer(path->nodes[0], name->name, ptr, name->len);
|
||||
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, path->nodes[0]);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
btrfs_free_path(path);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -590,7 +586,6 @@ search_again:
|
|||
num_dec = (orig_num_bytes - extent_num_bytes);
|
||||
if (extent_start != 0)
|
||||
control->sub_bytes += num_dec;
|
||||
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(trans, leaf);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
extent_num_bytes =
|
||||
btrfs_file_extent_disk_num_bytes(leaf, fi);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue