sfc: support TC decap rules matching on enc_ip_tos

Allow efx_tc_encap_match entries to include an ip_tos and ip_tos_mask.
To avoid partially-overlapping Outer Rules (which can lead to undefined
 behaviour in the hardware), store extra "pseudo" entries in our
 encap_match hashtable, which are used to enforce that all Outer Rule
 entries within a given <src_ip,dst_ip,udp_dport> tuple (or IPv6
 equivalent) have the same ip_tos_mask.
The "direct" encap_match entry takes a reference on the "pseudo",
 allowing it to be destroyed when all "direct" entries using it are
 removed.
efx_tc_em_pseudo_type is an enum rather than just a bool because in
 future an additional pseudo-type will be added to support Conntrack
 offload.

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c

@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_KEYID) |
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV4_ADDRS) |
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IPV6_ADDRS) |
+	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_IP) |
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_PORTS) |
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ENC_CONTROL) |
 	      BIT(FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_TCP) |
@@ -346,20 +347,47 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_parse_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
+					      struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&encap->ref))
+		return; /* still in use */
+
+	if (encap->type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT) {
+		rc = efx_mae_unregister_encap_match(efx, encap);
+		if (rc)
+			/* Display message but carry on and remove entry from our
+			 * SW tables, because there's not much we can do about it.
+			 */
+			netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+				  "Failed to release encap match %#x, rc %d\n",
+				  encap->fw_id, rc);
+	}
+	rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
+			       efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
+	if (encap->pseudo)
+		efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, encap->pseudo);
+	kfree(encap);
+}
+
 static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 					    struct efx_tc_match *match,
 					    enum efx_encap_type type,
+					    enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type em_type,
+					    u8 child_ip_tos_mask,
 					    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
-	struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old;
+	struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap, *old, *pseudo = NULL;
 	bool ipv6 = false;
 	int rc;
 
 	/* We require that the socket-defining fields (IP addrs and UDP dest
-	 * port) are present and exact-match.  Other fields are currently not
+	 * port) are present and exact-match.  Other fields may only be used
-	 * allowed.  This meets what OVS will ask for, and means that we don't
+	 * if the field-set (and any masks) are the same for all encap
-	 * need to handle difficult checks for overlapping matches as could
+	 * matches on the same <sip,dip,dport> tuple; this is enforced by
-	 * come up if we allowed masks or varying sets of match fields.
+	 * pseudo encap matches.
 	 */
 	if (match->mask.enc_dst_ip | match->mask.enc_src_ip) {
 		if (!IS_ALL_ONES(match->mask.enc_dst_ip)) {
@@ -402,21 +430,37 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 	if (match->mask.enc_ip_tos) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP ToS not supported");
+		struct efx_tc_match pmatch = *match;
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+		if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK) { /* can't happen */
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Bad recursion in egress encap match handler");
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
+		pmatch.value.enc_ip_tos = 0;
+		pmatch.mask.enc_ip_tos = 0;
+		rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, &pmatch, type,
+						      EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK,
+						      match->mask.enc_ip_tos,
+						      extack);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+		pseudo = pmatch.encap;
 	}
 	if (match->mask.enc_ip_ttl) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Egress encap match on IP TTL not supported");
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		goto fail_pseudo;
 	}
 
 	rc = efx_mae_check_encap_match_caps(efx, ipv6, match->mask.enc_ip_tos, extack);
 	if (rc)
-		return rc;
+		goto fail_pseudo;
 
 	encap = kzalloc(sizeof(*encap), GFP_USER);
-	if (!encap)
+	if (!encap) {
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto fail_pseudo;
+	}
 	encap->src_ip = match->value.enc_src_ip;
 	encap->dst_ip = match->value.enc_dst_ip;
 #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6
@@ -425,12 +469,56 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 #endif
 	encap->udp_dport = match->value.enc_dport;
 	encap->tun_type = type;
+	encap->ip_tos = match->value.enc_ip_tos;
+	encap->ip_tos_mask = match->mask.enc_ip_tos;
+	encap->child_ip_tos_mask = child_ip_tos_mask;
+	encap->type = em_type;
+	encap->pseudo = pseudo;
 	old = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht,
 						&encap->linkage,
 						efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
 	if (old) {
 		/* don't need our new entry */
 		kfree(encap);
+		if (pseudo) /* don't need our new pseudo either */
+			efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, pseudo);
+		/* check old and new em_types are compatible */
+		switch (old->type) {
+		case EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT:
+			/* old EM is in hardware, so mustn't overlap with a
+			 * pseudo, but may be shared with another direct EM
+			 */
+			if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT)
+				break;
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Pseudo encap match conflicts with existing direct entry");
+			return -EEXIST;
+		case EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK:
+			/* old EM is protecting a ToS-qualified filter, so may
+			 * only be shared with another pseudo for the same
+			 * ToS mask.
+			 */
+			if (em_type != EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+						       "%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(MASK) entry",
+						       encap->type ? "Pseudo" : "Direct");
+				return -EEXIST;
+			}
+			if (child_ip_tos_mask != old->child_ip_tos_mask) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+						       "Pseudo encap match for TOS mask %#04x conflicts with existing pseudo(MASK) entry for TOS mask %#04x",
+						       child_ip_tos_mask,
+						       old->child_ip_tos_mask);
+				return -EEXIST;
+			}
+			break;
+		default: /* Unrecognised pseudo-type.  Just say no */
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
+					       "%s encap match conflicts with existing pseudo(%d) entry",
+					       encap->type ? "Pseudo" : "Direct",
+					       old->type);
+			return -EEXIST;
+		}
+		/* check old and new tun_types are compatible */
 		if (old->tun_type != type) {
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT_MOD(extack,
 					       "Egress encap match with conflicting tun_type %u != %u",
@@ -442,10 +530,12 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
 		/* existing entry found */
 		encap = old;
 	} else {
-		rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap);
+		if (em_type == EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT) {
-		if (rc) {
+			rc = efx_mae_register_encap_match(efx, encap);
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW");
+			if (rc) {
-			goto fail;
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Failed to record egress encap match in HW");
+				goto fail;
+			}
 		}
 		refcount_set(&encap->ref, 1);
 	}
@@ -455,30 +545,12 @@ fail:
 	rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
 			       efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
 	kfree(encap);
+fail_pseudo:
+	if (pseudo)
+		efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(efx, pseudo);
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static void efx_tc_flower_release_encap_match(struct efx_nic *efx,
-					      struct efx_tc_encap_match *encap)
-{
-	int rc;
-
-	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&encap->ref))
-		return; /* still in use */
-
-	rc = efx_mae_unregister_encap_match(efx, encap);
-	if (rc)
-		/* Display message but carry on and remove entry from our
-		 * SW tables, because there's not much we can do about it.
-		 */
-		netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
-			  "Failed to release encap match %#x, rc %d\n",
-			  encap->fw_id, rc);
-	rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->encap_match_ht, &encap->linkage,
-			       efx_tc_encap_match_ht_params);
-	kfree(encap);
-}
-
 static void efx_tc_delete_rule(struct efx_nic *efx, struct efx_tc_flow_rule *rule)
 {
 	efx_mae_delete_rule(efx, rule->fw_id);
@@ -632,6 +704,7 @@ static int efx_tc_flower_replace_foreign(struct efx_nic *efx,
 		}
 
 		rc = efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match(efx, &match, type,
+						      EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT, 0,
 						      extack);
 		if (rc)
 			goto release;

drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h

@@ -74,6 +74,27 @@ static inline bool efx_tc_match_is_encap(const struct efx_tc_match_fields *mask)
 	       mask->enc_ip_ttl || mask->enc_sport || mask->enc_dport;
 }
 
+/**
+ * enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type - &struct efx_tc_encap_match pseudo type
+ *
+ * These are used to classify "pseudo" encap matches, which don't refer
+ * to an entry in hardware but rather indicate that a section of the
+ * match space is in use by another Outer Rule.
+ *
+ * @EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT: real HW entry in Outer Rule table; not a pseudo.
+ *	Hardware index in &struct efx_tc_encap_match.fw_id is valid.
+ * @EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK: registered by an encap match which includes a
+ *	match on an optional field (currently only ip_tos), to prevent an
+ *	overlapping encap match _without_ optional fields.
+ *	The pseudo encap match may be referenced again by an encap match
+ *	with a different ip_tos value, but all ip_tos_mask must match the
+ *	first (stored in our child_ip_tos_mask).
+ */
+enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type {
+	EFX_TC_EM_DIRECT,
+	EFX_TC_EM_PSEUDO_MASK,
+};
+
 struct efx_tc_encap_match {
 	__be32 src_ip, dst_ip;
 	struct in6_addr src_ip6, dst_ip6;
@@ -81,8 +102,11 @@ struct efx_tc_encap_match {
 	u8 ip_tos, ip_tos_mask;
 	struct rhash_head linkage;
 	enum efx_encap_type tun_type;
+	u8 child_ip_tos_mask;
 	refcount_t ref;
+	enum efx_tc_em_pseudo_type type;
 	u32 fw_id; /* index of this entry in firmware encap match table */
+	struct efx_tc_encap_match *pseudo; /* Referenced pseudo EM if needed */
 };
 
 struct efx_tc_match {