net: mscc: ocelot: fix stats region batching
The blamed commit changed struct ocelot_stat_layout :: "u32 offset" to "u32 reg". However, "u32 reg" is not quite a register address, but an enum ocelot_reg, which in itself encodes an enum ocelot_target target in the upper bits, and an index into the ocelot->map[target][] array in the lower bits. So, whereas the previous code comparison between stats_layout[i].offset and last + 1 was correct (because those "offsets" at the time were 32-bit relative addresses), the new code, comparing layout[i].reg to last + 4 is not correct, because the "reg" here is an enum/index, not an actual register address. What we want to compare are indeed register addresses, but to do that, we need to actually go through the same motions as __ocelot_bulk_read_ix() itself. With this bug, all statistics counters are deemed by ocelot_prepare_stats_regions() as constituting their own region. (Truncated) log on VSC9959 (Felix) below (prints added by me): Before: region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x000] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x001] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x002] ... region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x041] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x042] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x080] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x081] ... region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x0ac] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x100] region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x101] ... region of 1 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x111] After: region of 67 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x000] region of 45 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x080] region of 18 contiguous counters starting with SYS:STAT:CNT[0x100] Since commitd87b1c08f3
("net: mscc: ocelot: use bulk reads for stats") intended bulking as a performance improvement, and since now, with trivial-sized regions, performance is even worse than without bulking at all, this could easily qualify as a performance regression. Fixes:d4c3676507
("net: mscc: ocelot: keep ocelot_stat_layout by reg address, not offset") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> Tested-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e50ed7745
commit
6acc72a43e
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -899,7 +899,8 @@ static int ocelot_prepare_stats_regions(struct ocelot *ocelot)
|
|||
if (!layout[i].reg)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (region && layout[i].reg == last + 4) {
|
||||
if (region && ocelot->map[SYS][layout[i].reg & REG_MASK] ==
|
||||
ocelot->map[SYS][last & REG_MASK] + 4) {
|
||||
region->count++;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
region = devm_kzalloc(ocelot->dev, sizeof(*region),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue