PM: sleep: Do not assume that "mem" is always present
An implementation of suspend_ops is allowed to reject the PM_SUSPEND_MEM
suspend type from its ->valid() callback, we should not assume that it
is always present as this is not a correct reflection of what a firmware
interface may support.
Fixes: 406e79385f
("PM / sleep: System sleep state selection interface rework")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6880fa6c56
commit
bfcc1e67ff
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -171,8 +171,7 @@ static bool valid_state(suspend_state_t state)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void __init pm_states_init(void)
|
void __init pm_states_init(void)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* "mem" and "freeze" are always present in /sys/power/state. */
|
/* "freeze" is always present in /sys/power/state. */
|
||||||
pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
|
|
||||||
pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE];
|
pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_TO_IDLE];
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Suspend-to-idle should be supported even without any suspend_ops,
|
* Suspend-to-idle should be supported even without any suspend_ops,
|
||||||
|
@ -214,6 +213,7 @@ void suspend_set_ops(const struct platform_suspend_ops *ops)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (valid_state(PM_SUSPEND_MEM)) {
|
if (valid_state(PM_SUSPEND_MEM)) {
|
||||||
mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = mem_sleep_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
|
mem_sleep_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = mem_sleep_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
|
||||||
|
pm_states[PM_SUSPEND_MEM] = pm_labels[PM_SUSPEND_MEM];
|
||||||
if (mem_sleep_default >= PM_SUSPEND_MEM)
|
if (mem_sleep_default >= PM_SUSPEND_MEM)
|
||||||
mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
|
mem_sleep_current = PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue