In mchp_core_pwm_apply_locked(), if hw_period_steps is equal to its max,
an error is reported and .apply fails. The max value is actually a
permitted value however, and so this check can fail where multiple
channels are enabled.
For example, the first channel to be configured requests a period that
sets hw_period_steps to the maximum value, and when a second channel
is enabled the driver reads hw_period_steps back from the hardware and
finds it to be the maximum possible value, triggering the warning on a
permitted value. The value to be avoided is 255 (PERIOD_STEPS_MAX + 1),
as that will produce undesired behaviour, so test for greater than,
rather than equal to.
Fixes: 2bf7ecf7b4 ("pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122-pastor-fancied-0b993da2d2d2@spud
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@kernel.org>
This prepares the pwm-microchip-core driver to further changes of the
pwm core outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc(). There
is no intended semantical change and the driver should behave as before.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c6660b655c1d4c9d79280030e24090a4a4c5dd8b.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and so cannot be modified.
The upside is that new low level drivers cannot forget the assignment and
save one line each. The pwm-crc driver didn't assign .owner, that's not
a problem in practice though as the driver cannot be compiled as a
module.
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> # Intel LPSS
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> # pwm-{bcm,brcm}*.c
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> # sun4i
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> # pwm-visconti
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> # pwm-rockchip
Acked-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> # pwm-sl28cpld
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # pwm-meson
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804142707.412137-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
