By moving that in atomfw_read_efuse().
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Programming AC Timing Parameters is only dependent on MCLK.
No need to nest loop for each SCLK DPM level.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of sharing the fan table setup with Tonga, Polaris has
its own fan table setup.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This is for some special Polaris10 ASICs.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As this is not needed for polaris.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Set the BootLinkLevel as the max level.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct the setting for "ActivityLevel".
V2: rich the comment
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct the settings for "StutterEnable" and "EnabledForActivity".
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Make sure the settings are applied only when voltage
controlled by gpio.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
To avoid underflow seen on Polaris10 with some 3440x1440
144Hz displays. As the threshold of 190 us cuts too close
to minVBlankTime of 192 us.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_table, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7db0bc.7Xivn4K83f7XW0ug%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61df.jWrFfnjxGbjSkPOp%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a
one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the
size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61e2.qiTVTyG2pVoG8bb0%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have been multiplied it by
sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it
should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.iT%2FQTjN+659XUDo5%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
ptable->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d36.6PStUZp2HRxAz7IM%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3c.TyfOhg%2FA6JycL6ZN%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_array, instead of a one-element array, and use the
struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433f.ZyMD+YUIVAwiHGVe%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add one sysfs file -- "pp_od_clk_voltage" for
Raven/Raven2/Picasso APU, which is only used by dGPU like VEGA10.
This sysfs file supports the feature to modify gfx engine clock(Mhz units), it can
be used to configure the min value and the max value for gfx clock limited in the
safe range.
Command guide:
echo "s level clock" > pp_od_clk_voltage
s - adjust teh sclk level
level - 0 or 1, "0" represents the min value, "1" represents the max value
clock - the clock value(Mhz units), like 400, 800 or 1200, the value must be within the
OD_RANGE limits.
Example:
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 200Mhz
1: 1400Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
$ echo "s 0 600" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ echo "s 1 1000" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 600Mhz
1: 1000Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
smc, sdma, sos, ta and asd fw is not used in SRIOV. Skip them to
accelerate sw_init for navi12.
v2: skip above fw in SRIOV for vega10 and sienna_cichlid
v3: directly skip psp fw loading in SRIOV
Signed-off-by: Jingwen Chen <Jingwen.Chen2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily.Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK value should not be used to set the DPM.
Suggested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudheesh Mavila <sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Different mclk dpm policy will be applied based on the VRAM
width.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Return value should be -EINVAL rather than EINVAL
Fixes: f83a9991648bb("drm/amd/powerplay: add Vega10 powerplay support (v5)")
Fixes: 2cac05dee6e30("drm/amd/powerplay: add the hw manager for vega12 (v4)")
Cc: Eric Huang <JinHuiEric.Huang@amd.com>
Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoliang Pang <dawning.pang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SMU FCLK,SOCCLK have dependency on VCN CLKs. Lower VCN values so that
FCLK, SOCCLK reflect values set by UMD Stable Pstate.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Which tells it's a normal pstate change or memory retraining.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Tested-by: Changfeng Zhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
On my R9 390, the voltage was reported as a constant 1000 mV.
This was due to a bug in smu7_hwmgr.c, in the smu7_read_sensor()
function, where some magic constants were used in a condition,
to determine whether the voltage should be read from PLANE2_VID
or PLANE1_VID. The VDDC mask was incorrectly used, instead of
the VDDGFX mask.
This patch changes the code to use the correct defined constants
(and apply the correct bitshift), thus resulting in correct voltage reporting.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Starting in Linux 5.8, the graphics and memory clock frequency were not being
reported for CIK cards. This is a regression, since they were reported correctly
in Linux 5.7.
After investigation, I discovered that the smum_send_msg_to_smc() function,
attempts to call the corresponding get_argument() function of ci_smu_funcs.
However, the get_argument() function is not defined in ci_smu_funcs.
This patch fixes the bug by specifying the correct get_argument() function.
Fixes: a0ec225633 ("drm/amd/powerplay: unified interfaces for message issuing and response checking")
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Raghuraman <sandy.8925@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Normally softwareshutdowntemp should be greater than Thotspotlimit.
However, on some VEGA10 ASIC, the softwareshutdowntemp is 91C while
Thotspotlimit is 105C. This seems not right and may trigger some
false alarms.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
DC uses these to raise the voltage as needed for higher dispclk/dppclk
and to ensure that we have enough bandwidth to drive the displays.
There's a bug preventing these from actuially sending messages since
it's checking the actual clock (which is 0) instead of the incoming
clock (which shouldn't be 0) when deciding to send the hardmin.
[How]
Check the clocks != 0 instead of the actual clocks.
Fixes: 9ed9203c3e ("drm/amd/powerplay: rv dal-pplib interface refactor powerplay part")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Do the maths in celsius degree. This can fix the issues caused
by the changes below:
drm/amd/pm: correct Vega20 swctf limit setting
drm/amd/pm: correct Vega12 swctf limit setting
drm/amd/pm: correct Vega10 swctf limit setting
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct the Vega20 thermal swctf limit.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct the Vega12 thermal swctf limit.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Correct the Vega10 thermal swctf limit.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1267
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In init_powerplay_table_information() the value returned from kmalloc()
is cast unnecessarily. Remove cast.
Issue identified with Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Remove asic_reg/nbio/nbio_6_1_offset.h which is included more than once
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
if other threads have holden the reset lock, recovery will
fail to try_lock. Therefore we introduce atomic hive->in_reset
and adev->in_gpu_reset, to avoid reentering GPU recovery.
v2:
drop "? true : false" in the definition of amdgpu_in_reset
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The target is to provide a clear entry point(for power routines).
Also this can help to maintain a clear view about the frameworks
used on different ASICs. Hopefully all these can make power part
more friendly to play with.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
