We are missing the implementation of some workarounds to enabled PSR2
in Alderlake P, so to avoid any CI report of issues around PSR2
disabling it until all PSR2 workarounds are implemented.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-5-jose.souza@intel.com
DC3CO is allowed in all the combinations between pipe and port A and B
on alderlake-P.
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-4-jose.souza@intel.com
In order to reuse code of PSR interrupt error check on other PSR functions,
it adds psr_interrupt_error_check() function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
It replaces dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct. And
it saves dc3co_exitline, not dc3co_enabled, so we can use dc3co_exitline
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal function like as
intel_psr_enable_source().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-12-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was
programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed.
So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout,
EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state
flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The implementation of two workarounds are missing causing failures
in CI with pre-production HW.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210505213801.80772-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
TGL PSR2 hardware tracking shows momentary flicker and screen shift if
TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0.
It has been fixed from TGL Display stepping C0.
HSDES: 18015970021
HSDES: 2209313811
BSpec: 55378
v2: Add checking of PSR2 manual tracking (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210422160544.2427123-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE became a reserved register in display 13.
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID have the same fate as EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE
but as we don't need it, removing the macro definition of it.
BSpec: 50422
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421220224.200729-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Gen to ver conversions across the driver
The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville's GLK fixes [2] and a
cherry-pick of Matt's commit [3] from drm-intel-next as a base to avoid
conflicts.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88938/
[3] 70bfb30743 ("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/878s5ebny0.fsf@intel.com
Fix redundant condition, caught in cppcheck by kernel test robot.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Fixes: b64d6c5138 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210409231738.238682-1-jose.souza@intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 71c1a49983.
The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and
get back some power savings.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408204917.254272-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as
those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet
in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
HSDES: 14011750631
HSDES: 14011741325
BSpec: 53273
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408214205.327704-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Even though GEN12+ HW supports PSR + DC3CO, DMC's HW DC3CO exit mechanism
has an issue with using of Selective Fecth and PSR2 manual tracking.
And as some GEN12+ platforms (RKL, ADL-S) don't support PSR2 HW tracking,
Selective Fetch will be enabled by default on that platforms.
Therefore if the system enables PSR Selective Fetch / PSR manual tracking,
it does not allow DC3CO dc state, in that case.
When this DC3CO exit issue is addressed while PSR Selective Fetch is
enabled, this restriction should be removed.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Fix typo
- Move check routine of DC3CO ability to
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config()
v3: Change the check routine of enablement of psr2 sel fetch. (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222213006.1609085-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This will set the right value of source_support when the port
encoder/port supports PSR but sink don't.
This change will also be needed in future for panel replay as psr
struct needs to be initialized even if disconnected or current sink
don't support PSR.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-4-jose.souza@intel.com
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check
it again at every CAN_PSR().
Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set
the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had
that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder.
Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is
set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just
ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have
with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch().
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now CI is blacklisting module reload, so we need to be able to
enable PSR2 selective fetch in run time to test this feature before
enable it by default.
Changes in IGT will also be needed.
v2:
- Fixed handling of I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH in
intel_psr_debug_set()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209205036.351076-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher.
Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file,
there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions
later.
v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions,
add header file.
v3: move scaler bits back
v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville)
v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes
v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
While JSL and EHL eDP transcoder supports PSR2, the phy of this
platforms only supports eDP 1.3, so removing PSR2 support as this
feature was added in eDP 1.4.
Signed-off-by: Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204175830.97857-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Even though our HW supports PSR + VRR, the available panels
do not work reliably with PSR and VRR together. So if user
requested VRR and is supported by HW enable that and do not
enable PSR in that case.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-7-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a
surprisingly clean cut.
v2:
- Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman)
- Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
TGL adds another level of indirection for applying WA based on stepping
information rather than PCI REVID. So change TGL_REVID enum into
stepping enum and use PCI REVID as index into revid to stepping table to
fetch correct display and GT stepping for application of WAs as
suggested by Matt Roper.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 0883ce8146. Originally
these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP
backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible
to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist
for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces
over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the
normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually
filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs.
At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with
DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a
second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work
with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for
HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to
light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which
means we finally have a real solution to this problem.
As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and
furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk
checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only
driver using this.
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in
intel_edp_init_connector()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
It programs Plane's calculated x, y, offset to Plane SF register.
It does the calculation of x and y offsets using
skl_calc_main_surface_offset().
v3: Update commit message
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area.
Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software
needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips.
Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another
loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe
damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending
of all planes can happen.
v2:
- do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
v4:
- setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area
- mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha
changed
v5:
- taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates
- adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are
invisible in the new state
v6:
- consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it
moved to calculate damaged area
- remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip
v7:
- intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area
v8:
- adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping
- adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the
framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from
v9:
- Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible
- Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and
new state
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Add the calculations to set plane selective fetch registers depending
in the value of the area damaged.
It is still using the whole plane area as damaged but that will change
in next patches.
v2:
- fixed new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2 typo in
intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
- do not shifthing new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130125750.17820-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state
after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added
initial_fastset_check() hook.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual
glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive
workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached.
Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without
glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost
of less time with PSR active.
So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better
fix is found.
The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if
there is not other frontbuffer modifications.
Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse
the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround
as soon as a better solution is found.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration
validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW
tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from
Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on
Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12
and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros.
v2: Fix macro definitions. (José)
v3: Addressed review comments from José
- Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+
- Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input.
- Update Todo comments.
v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some
issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be
a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is
due VBT values.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
