This selftests shows a proof of concept method to use BPF LSM to enforce
file signature. This test is added to verify_pkcs7_sig, so that some
existing logic can be reused.
This file signature method uses fsverity, which provides reliable and
efficient hash (known as digest) of the file. The file digest is signed
with asymmetic key, and the signature is stored in xattr. At the run time,
BPF LSM reads file digest and the signature, and then checks them against
the public key.
Note that this solution does NOT require FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES.
fsverity is only used to provide file digest. The signature verification
and access control is all implemented in BPF LSM.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129234417.856536-7-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add selftests for two new filesystem kfuncs:
1. bpf_get_file_xattr
2. bpf_get_fsverity_digest
These tests simply make sure the two kfuncs work. Another selftest will be
added to demonstrate how to use these kfuncs to verify file signature.
CONFIG_FS_VERITY is added to selftests config. However, this is not
sufficient to guarantee bpf_get_fsverity_digest works. This is because
fsverity need to be enabled at file system level (for example, with tune2fs
on ext4). If local file system doesn't have this feature enabled, just skip
the test.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129234417.856536-6-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
These selftests are written in prog_tests style instead of adding
them to the existing test_sock_addr tests. Migrating the existing
sock addr tests to prog_tests style is left for future work. This
commit adds support for testing bind() sockaddr hooks, even though
there's no unix socket sockaddr hook for bind(). We leave this code
intact for when the INET and INET6 tests are migrated in the future
which do support intercepting bind().
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011185113.140426-10-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Currently kernel kfunc bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly() has prototype ...
__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
... while selftests bpf_kfuncs.h has:
extern int bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym;
Such a mismatch might cause problems although currently it is okay in
selftests. Fix it to prevent future potential surprise.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230517040409.4024618-1-yhs@fb.com
With latest llvm17, dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null subtest failed in my testing
VM. The failure log looks like below:
All error logs:
tester_init:PASS:tester_log_buf 0 nsec
process_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
process_subtest:PASS:Can't alloc specs array 0 nsec
verify_success:PASS:dynptr_success__open 0 nsec
verify_success:PASS:bpf_object__find_program_by_name 0 nsec
verify_success:PASS:dynptr_success__load 0 nsec
verify_success:PASS:bpf_program__attach 0 nsec
verify_success:FAIL:err unexpected err: actual 4 != expected 0
#65/9 dynptr/test_dynptr_is_null:FAIL
The error happens for bpf prog test_dynptr_is_null in dynptr_success.c:
if (bpf_dynptr_is_null(&ptr2)) {
err = 4;
goto exit;
}
The bpf_dynptr_is_null(&ptr) unexpectedly returned a non-zero value and
the control went to the error path. Digging further, I found the root cause
is due to function signature difference between kernel and user space.
In kernel, we have ...
__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_null(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
... while in bpf_kfuncs.h we have:
extern int bpf_dynptr_is_null(const struct bpf_dynptr *ptr) __ksym;
The kernel bpf_dynptr_is_null disasm code:
ffffffff812f1a90 <bpf_dynptr_is_null>:
ffffffff812f1a90: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
ffffffff812f1a94: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl (%rax,%rax)
ffffffff812f1a99: 53 pushq %rbx
ffffffff812f1a9a: 48 89 fb movq %rdi, %rbx
ffffffff812f1a9d: e8 ae 29 17 00 callq 0xffffffff81464450 <__asan_load8_noabort>
ffffffff812f1aa2: 48 83 3b 00 cmpq $0x0, (%rbx)
ffffffff812f1aa6: 0f 94 c0 sete %al
ffffffff812f1aa9: 5b popq %rbx
ffffffff812f1aaa: c3 retq
Note that only 1-byte register %al is set and the other 7-bytes are not
touched. In bpf program, the asm code for the above bpf_dynptr_is_null(&ptr2):
266: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -0x1
267: b4 01 00 00 04 00 00 00 w1 = 0x4
268: 16 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 if w0 == 0x0 goto +0x3 <LBB9_8>
Basically, 4-byte subregister is tested. This might cause error as the value
other than the lowest byte might not be 0.
This patch fixed the issue by using the identical func prototype across kernel
and selftest user space. The fixed bpf asm code:
267: 85 10 00 00 ff ff ff ff call -0x1
268: 54 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 w0 &= 0x1
269: b4 01 00 00 04 00 00 00 w1 = 0x4
270: 16 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 if w0 == 0x0 goto +0x3 <LBB9_8>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230517040404.4023912-1-yhs@fb.com
Test skb and xdp dynptr functionality in the following ways:
1) progs/test_cls_redirect_dynptr.c
* Rewrite "progs/test_cls_redirect.c" test to use dynptrs to parse
skb data
* This is a great example of how dynptrs can be used to simplify a
lot of the parsing logic for non-statically known values.
When measuring the user + system time between the original version
vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
"time ./test_progs -t cls_redirect"):
original version: 0.092 sec
with dynptrs: 0.078 sec
2) progs/test_xdp_dynptr.c
* Rewrite "progs/test_xdp.c" test to use dynptrs to parse xdp data
When measuring the user + system time between the original version
vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
"time ./test_progs -t xdp_attach"):
original version: 0.118 sec
with dynptrs: 0.094 sec
3) progs/test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.c
* Rewrite "progs/test_l4lb_noinline.c" test to use dynptrs to parse
skb data
When measuring the user + system time between the original version
vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
"time ./test_progs -t l4lb_all"):
original version: 0.062 sec
with dynptrs: 0.081 sec
For number of processed verifier instructions:
original version: 6268 insns
with dynptrs: 2588 insns
4) progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt_dynptr.c
* Add sample code for parsing tcp hdr opt lookup using dynptrs.
This logic is lifted from a real-world use case of packet parsing
in katran [0], a layer 4 load balancer. The original version
"progs/test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt.c" (not using dynptrs) is included
here as well, for comparison.
When measuring the user + system time between the original version
vs. using dynptrs, and averaging the time for 10 runs (using
"time ./test_progs -t parse_tcp_hdr_opt"):
original version: 0.031 sec
with dynptrs: 0.045 sec
5) progs/dynptr_success.c
* Add test case "test_skb_readonly" for testing attempts at writes
on a prog type with read-only skb ctx.
* Add "test_dynptr_skb_data" for testing that bpf_dynptr_data isn't
supported for skb progs.
6) progs/dynptr_fail.c
* Add test cases "skb_invalid_data_slice{1,2,3,4}" and
"xdp_invalid_data_slice{1,2}" for testing that helpers that modify the
underlying packet buffer automatically invalidate the associated
data slice.
* Add test cases "skb_invalid_ctx" and "xdp_invalid_ctx" for testing
that prog types that do not support bpf_dynptr_from_skb/xdp don't
have access to the API.
* Add test case "dynptr_slice_var_len{1,2}" for testing that
variable-sized len can't be passed in to bpf_dynptr_slice
* Add test case "skb_invalid_slice_write" for testing that writes to a
read-only data slice are rejected by the verifier.
* Add test case "data_slice_out_of_bounds_skb" for testing that
writes to an area outside the slice are rejected.
* Add test case "invalid_slice_rdwr_rdonly" for testing that prog
types that don't allow writes to packet data don't accept any calls
to bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr.
[0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/katran/blob/main/katran/lib/bpf/pckt_parsing.h
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301154953.641654-11-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
