Add a bunch of global subprogs across variety of program types to
validate expected kernel type enforcement logic for __arg_ctx arguments.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240118033143.3384355-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a test case for PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS alu. Testing if alu with variable
offset on flow_keys is rejected. For the fixed offset success case, we
already have C code coverage to verify (e.g. via bpf_flow.c).
Signed-off-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240115082028.9992-2-sunhao.th@gmail.com
The patch adds a test to exercise the bpf_iter_udp batching
logic. It specifically tests the case that there are multiple
so_reuseport udp_sk in a bucket of the udp_table.
The test creates two sets of so_reuseport sockets and
each set on a different port. Meaning there will be
two buckets in the udp_table.
The test does the following:
1. read() 3 out of 4 sockets in the first bucket.
2. close() all sockets in the first bucket. This
will ensure the current bucket's offset in
the kernel does not affect the read() of the
following bucket.
3. read() all 4 sockets in the second bucket.
The test also reads one udp_sk at a time from
the bpf_iter_udp prog. The true case in
"do_test(..., bool onebyone)". This is the buggy case
that the previous patch fixed.
It also tests the "false" case in "do_test(..., bool onebyone)",
meaning the userspace reads the whole bucket. There is
no bug in this case but adding this test also while
at it.
Considering the way to have multiple tcp_sk in the same
bucket is similar (by using so_reuseport),
this patch also tests the bpf_iter_tcp even though the
bpf_iter_tcp batching logic works correctly.
Both IP v4 and v6 are exercising the same bpf_iter batching
code path, so only v6 is tested.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240112190530.3751661-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a test case to verify the fix for "prog->aux->dst_trampoline and
tgt_prog is NULL" branch in bpf_tracing_prog_attach. The sequence of
events:
1. load rawtp program
2. load fentry program with rawtp as target_fd
3. create tracing link for fentry program with target_fd = 0
4. repeat 3
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103190559.14750-5-9erthalion6@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Verify the fact that only one fentry prog could be attached to another
fentry, building up an attachment chain of limited size. Use existing
bpf_testmod as a start of the chain.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103190559.14750-3-9erthalion6@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test gotol with offsets that don't fit into a short (i.e., larger than
32k or smaller than -32k).
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102193531.3169422-4-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a few extra cases of global funcs with context arguments. This time
rely on "arg:ctx" decl_tag (__arg_ctx macro), but put it next to
"classic" cases where context argument has to be of an exact type that
BPF verifier expects (e.g., bpf_user_pt_regs_t for kprobe/uprobe).
Colocating all these cases separately from other global func args that
rely on arg:xxx decl tags (in verifier_global_subprogs.c) allows for
simpler backwards compatibility testing on old kernels. All the cases in
test_global_func_ctx_args.c are supposed to work on older kernels, which
was manually validated during development.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104013847.3875810-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a selftest to capture the verification failure when the allocation
size is greater than 512.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031812.1293190-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In the previous patch, the maximum data size for bpf_global_percpu_ma
is 512 bytes. This breaks selftest test_bpf_ma. The test is adjusted
in two aspects:
- Since the maximum allowed data size for bpf_global_percpu_ma is
512, remove all tests beyond that, names sizes 1024, 2048 and 4096.
- Previously the percpu data size is bucket_size - 8 in order to
avoid percpu allocation into the next bucket. This patch removed
such data size adjustment thanks to Patch 1.
Also, a better way to generate BTF type is used than adding
a member to the value struct.
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031807.1292853-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Convert exceptions_assert.c to bpf_cmp_unlikely() macro.
Since
bpf_assert(bpf_cmp_unlikely(var, ==, 100));
other code;
will generate assembly code:
if r1 == 100 goto L2;
r0 = 0
call bpf_throw
L1:
other code;
...
L2: goto L1;
LLVM generates redundant basic block with extra goto. LLVM will be fixed eventually.
Right now it's less efficient than __bpf_assert(var, ==, 100) macro that produces:
if r1 == 100 goto L1;
r0 = 0
call bpf_throw
L1:
other code;
But extra goto doesn't hurt the verification process.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231226191148.48536-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Compilers optimize conditional operators at will, but often bpf programmers
want to force compilers to keep the same operator in asm as it's written in C.
Introduce bpf_cmp_likely/unlikely(var1, conditional_op, var2) macros that can be used as:
- if (seen >= 1000)
+ if (bpf_cmp_unlikely(seen, >=, 1000))
The macros take advantage of BPF assembly that is C like.
The macros check the sign of variable 'seen' and emits either
signed or unsigned compare.
For example:
int a;
bpf_cmp_unlikely(a, >, 0) will be translated to 'if rX s> 0 goto' in BPF assembly.
unsigned int a;
bpf_cmp_unlikely(a, >, 0) will be translated to 'if rX > 0 goto' in BPF assembly.
C type conversions coupled with comparison operator are tricky.
int i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is false.
long i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is true.
Make sure BPF program is compiled with -Wsign-compare then the macros will catch
the mistake.
The macros check LHS (left hand side) only to figure out the sign of compare.
'if 0 < rX goto' is not allowed in the assembly, so the users
have to use a variable on LHS anyway.
The patch updates few tests to demonstrate the use of the macros.
The macro allows to use BPF_JSET in C code, since LLVM doesn't generate it at
present. For example:
if (i & j) compiles into r0 &= r1; if r0 == 0 goto
while
if (bpf_cmp_unlikely(i, &, j)) compiles into if r0 & r1 goto
Note that the macros has to be careful with RHS assembly predicate.
Since:
u64 __rhs = 1ull << 42;
asm goto("if r0 < %[rhs] goto +1" :: [rhs] "ri" (__rhs));
LLVM will silently truncate 64-bit constant into s32 imm.
Note that [lhs] "r"((short)LHS) the type cast is a workaround for LLVM issue.
When LHS is exactly 32-bit LLVM emits redundant <<=32, >>=32 to zero upper 32-bits.
When LHS is 64 or 16 or 8-bit variable there are no shifts.
When LHS is 32-bit the (u64) cast doesn't help. Hence use (short) cast.
It does _not_ truncate the variable before it's assigned to a register.
Traditional likely()/unlikely() macros that use __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1 or 0)
have no effect on these macros, hence macros implement the logic manually.
bpf_cmp_unlikely() macro preserves compare operator as-is while
bpf_cmp_likely() macro flips the compare.
Consider two cases:
A.
for() {
if (foo >= 10) {
bar += foo;
}
other code;
}
B.
for() {
if (foo >= 10)
break;
other code;
}
It's ok to use either bpf_cmp_likely or bpf_cmp_unlikely macros in both cases,
but consider that 'break' is effectively 'goto out_of_the_loop'.
Hence it's better to use bpf_cmp_unlikely in the B case.
While 'bar += foo' is better to keep as 'fallthrough' == likely code path in the A case.
When it's written as:
A.
for() {
if (bpf_cmp_likely(foo, >=, 10)) {
bar += foo;
}
other code;
}
B.
for() {
if (bpf_cmp_unlikely(foo, >=, 10))
break;
other code;
}
The assembly will look like:
A.
for() {
if r1 < 10 goto L1;
bar += foo;
L1:
other code;
}
B.
for() {
if r1 >= 10 goto L2;
other code;
}
L2:
The bpf_cmp_likely vs bpf_cmp_unlikely changes basic block layout, hence it will
greatly influence the verification process. The number of processed instructions
will be different, since the verifier walks the fallthrough first.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231226191148.48536-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
GCC's -Wall includes -Wsign-compare while clang does not.
Since BPF programs are built with clang we need to add this flag explicitly
to catch problematic comparisons like:
int i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is false.
long i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is true.
C standard for reference:
- If either operand is unsigned long the other shall be converted to unsigned long.
- Otherwise, if one operand is a long int and the other unsigned int, then if a
long int can represent all the values of an unsigned int, the unsigned int
shall be converted to a long int; otherwise both operands shall be converted to
unsigned long int.
- Otherwise, if either operand is long, the other shall be converted to long.
- Otherwise, if either operand is unsigned, the other shall be converted to unsigned.
Unfortunately clang's -Wsign-compare is very noisy.
It complains about (s32)a == (u32)b which is safe and doen't have surprising behavior.
This patch fixes some of the issues. It needs a follow up to fix the rest.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231226191148.48536-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
This patch adds a test for the condition that the previous patch mucked
with - illegal zero-sized helper memory access. As opposed to existing
tests, this new one uses a size whose lower bound is zero, as opposed to
a known-zero one.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221232225.568730-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
This patch simplifies the verification of size arguments associated to
pointer arguments to helpers and kfuncs. Many helpers take a pointer
argument followed by the size of the memory access performed to be
performed through that pointer. Before this patch, the handling of the
size argument in check_mem_size_reg() was confusing and wasteful: if the
size register's lower bound was 0, then the verification was done twice:
once considering the size of the access to be the lower-bound of the
respective argument, and once considering the upper bound (even if the
two are the same). The upper bound checking is a super-set of the
lower-bound checking(*), except: the only point of the lower-bound check
is to handle the case where zero-sized-accesses are explicitly not
allowed and the lower-bound is zero. This static condition is now
checked explicitly, replacing a much more complex, expensive and
confusing verification call to check_helper_mem_access().
Error messages change in this patch. Before, messages about illegal
zero-size accesses depended on the type of the pointer and on other
conditions, and sometimes the message was plain wrong: in some tests
that changed you'll see that the old message was something like "R1 min
value is outside of the allowed memory range", where R1 is the pointer
register; the error was wrongly claiming that the pointer was bad
instead of the size being bad. Other times the information that the size
came for a register with a possible range of values was wrong, and the
error presented the size as a fixed zero. Now the errors refer to the
right register. However, the old error messages did contain useful
information about the pointer register which is now lost; recovering
this information was deemed not important enough.
(*) Besides standing to reason that the checks for a bigger size access
are a super-set of the checks for a smaller size access, I have also
mechanically verified this by reading the code for all types of
pointers. I could convince myself that it's true for all but
PTR_TO_BTF_ID (check_ptr_to_btf_access). There, simply looking
line-by-line does not immediately prove what we want. If anyone has any
qualms, let me know.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221232225.568730-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
bpf_mem_alloc() doesn't support zero-sized allocation, so removing these
tests from test_bpf_ma test. After the removal, there will no definition
for bin_data_8, so remove 8 from data_sizes array and adjust the index
of data_btf_ids array in all test cases accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216131052.27621-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a test validating that freplace'ing another main (entry) BPF program
fails if the target BPF program doesn't have valid/expected func proto BTF.
We extend fexit_bpf2bpf test to allow to specify expected log message
for negative test cases (where freplace program is expected to fail to
load).
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-11-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Remove duplicated BTF parsing logic when it comes to subprog call check.
Instead, use (potentially cached) results of btf_prepare_func_args() to
abstract away expectations of each subprog argument in generic terms
(e.g., "this is pointer to context", or "this is a pointer to memory of
size X"), and then use those simple high-level argument type
expectations to validate actual register states to check if they match
expectations.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of btf_check_subprog_arg_match(), use btf_prepare_func_args()
logic to validate "trustworthiness" of main BPF program's BTF information,
if it is present.
We ignored results of original BTF check anyway, often times producing
confusing and ominously-sounding "reg type unsupported for arg#0
function" message, which has no apparent effect on program correctness
and verification process.
All the -EFAULT returning sanity checks are already performed in
check_btf_info_early(), so there is zero reason to have this duplication
of logic between btf_check_subprog_call() and btf_check_subprog_arg_match().
Dropping btf_check_subprog_arg_match() simplifies
btf_check_func_arg_match() further removing `bool processing_call` flag.
One subtle bit that was done by btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was
potentially marking main program's BTF as unreliable. We do this
explicitly now with a dedicated simple check, preserving the original
behavior, but now based on well factored btf_prepare_func_args() logic.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add testcase for the logic that the verifier tracks the BPF_JNE for regs.
The assembly function "reg_not_equal_const()" and "reg_equal_const" that
we add is exactly converted from the following case:
u32 a = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
u64 b = 0;
a %= 8;
/* the "a > 0" here will be optimized to "a != 0" */
if (a > 0) {
/* now the range of a should be [1, 7] */
bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, 0, &b, a, 0);
}
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219134800.1550388-5-menglong8.dong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE+soXsSLHKoYyzcli6rmadz2vbToFAmWAz2EACgkQ6rmadz2v
bToqrw/9EwroZCc8GEHOKAlb/fzrMvn92rLo0ZW/cGN84QJPnx4zM6Zo0+fgLaaN
oqqztwMUwdzGC3uX3FfVXaaLKbJ/MeHeL9BXFZNW8zkRHciw4R7kIBhOdPnHyET7
uT+rQ4xPe1Mt7e9PjepKlSL5mEsxWfBkdUgsdn19Z2Vjdfr9mZMhYWYMJGcfTCD1
TwxHKBPhq5fN3IsshmMBB8IrRp1HStUKb65MgZ4dI22LJXxTsFkx5XMFXcmuqvkH
NhKj8jDcPEEh31bYcb6aG2Z4onw5F2lquygjk1Qyy5cyw45m/ipJKAXKdAyvJG+R
VZCWOET/9wbRwFSK5wxwihCuKghFiofK52i2PcGtXZh0PCouyZZneSJOKM0yVWKO
BvuJBxK4ETRnQyN6ZxhuJiEXG3/YMBBhyR2TX1LntVK9ct/k7qFVzATG49J39/sR
SYMbptBRj4a5oMJ1qn0nFVEDFkg0jTnTDNnsEpcz60Ayt6EsJ1XosO5yz2huf861
xgRMTKMseyG1/uV45tQ8ZPzbSPpBxjUi9Dl3coYsIm1a+y6clWUXcarONY5KVrpS
CR98DuFgl+E7dXuisd/Kz2p2KxxSPq8nytsmLlgOvrUqhwiXqB+TKN8EHgIapVOt
l1A5LrzXFTcGlT9MlaWBqEIy83Bu1nqQqbxrAFOE0k8A5jomXaw=
=stU2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-12-18
This PR is larger than usual and contains changes in various parts
of the kernel.
The main changes are:
1) Fix kCFI bugs in BPF, from Peter Zijlstra.
End result: all forms of indirect calls from BPF into kernel
and from kernel into BPF work with CFI enabled. This allows BPF
to work with CONFIG_FINEIBT=y.
2) Introduce BPF token object, from Andrii Nakryiko.
It adds an ability to delegate a subset of BPF features from privileged
daemon (e.g., systemd) through special mount options for userns-bound
BPF FS to a trusted unprivileged application. The design accommodates
suggestions from Christian Brauner and Paul Moore.
Example:
$ sudo mkdir -p /sys/fs/bpf/token
$ sudo mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf/token \
-o delegate_cmds=prog_load:MAP_CREATE \
-o delegate_progs=kprobe \
-o delegate_attachs=xdp
3) Various verifier improvements and fixes, from Andrii Nakryiko, Andrei Matei.
- Complete precision tracking support for register spills
- Fix verification of possibly-zero-sized stack accesses
- Fix access to uninit stack slots
- Track aligned STACK_ZERO cases as imprecise spilled registers.
It improves the verifier "instructions processed" metric from single
digit to 50-60% for some programs.
- Fix verifier retval logic
4) Support for VLAN tag in XDP hints, from Larysa Zaremba.
5) Allocate BPF trampoline via bpf_prog_pack mechanism, from Song Liu.
End result: better memory utilization and lower I$ miss for calls to BPF
via BPF trampoline.
6) Fix race between BPF prog accessing inner map and parallel delete,
from Hou Tao.
7) Add bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state() kfunc, from Daniel Xu.
It allows BPF interact with IPSEC infra. The intent is to support
software RSS (via XDP) for the upcoming ipsec pcpu work.
Experiments on AWS demonstrate single tunnel pcpu ipsec reaching
line rate on 100G ENA nics.
8) Expand bpf_cgrp_storage to support cgroup1 non-attach, from Yafang Shao.
9) BPF file verification via fsverity, from Song Liu.
It allows BPF progs get fsverity digest.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (164 commits)
bpf: Ensure precise is reset to false in __mark_reg_const_zero()
selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi fail tests
bpf: Fail uprobe multi link with negative offset
selftests/bpf: Test the release of map btf
s390/bpf: Fix indirect trampoline generation
selftests/bpf: Temporarily disable dummy_struct_ops test on s390
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_exception_cb() signature
bpf: Fix dtor CFI
cfi: Add CFI_NOSEAL()
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_callback_t CFI
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
cfi: Flip headers
selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-kprobe attachment
selftests/bpf: Don't use libbpf_get_error() in kprobe_multi_test
selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-uprobe attachment
bpf: Limit the number of kprobes when attaching program to multiple kprobes
bpf: Limit the number of uprobes when attaching program to multiple uprobes
bpf: xdp: Register generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs
selftests/bpf: utilize string values for delegate_xxx mount options
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219000520.34178-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
It is safe to always start with imprecise SCALAR_VALUE register.
Previously __mark_reg_const_zero() relied on caller to reset precise
mark, but it's very error prone and we already missed it in a few
places. So instead make __mark_reg_const_zero() reset precision always,
as it's a safe default for SCALAR_VALUE. Explanation is basically the
same as for why we are resetting (or rather not setting) precision in
current state. If necessary, precision propagation will set it to
precise correctly.
As such, also remove a big comment about forward precision propagation
in mark_reg_stack_read() and avoid unnecessarily setting precision to
true after reading from STACK_ZERO stack. Again, precision propagation
will correctly handle this, if that SCALAR_VALUE register will ever be
needed to be precise.
Reported-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231218173601.53047-1-andrii@kernel.org
When there is bpf_list_head or bpf_rb_root field in map value, the free
of map btf and the free of map value may run concurrently and there may
be use-after-free problem, so add two test cases to demonstrate it. And
the use-after-free problem can been easily reproduced by using bpf_next
tree and a KASAN-enabled kernel.
The first test case tests the racing between the free of map btf and the
free of array map. It constructs the racing by releasing the array map in
the end after other ref-counter of map btf has been released. To delay
the free of array map and make it be invoked after btf_free_rcu() is
invoked, it stresses system_unbound_wq by closing multiple percpu array
maps before it closes the array map.
The second case tests the racing between the free of map btf and the
free of inner map. Beside using the similar method as the first one
does, it uses bpf_map_delete_elem() to delete the inner map and to defer
the release of inner map after one RCU grace period.
The reason for using two skeletons is to prevent the release of outer
map and inner map in map_in_map_btf.c interfering the release of bpf
map in normal_map_btf.c.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231216035510.4030605-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
This commit extends test_tunnel selftest to test the new XDP xfrm state
lookup kfunc.
Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e704e9a4332e3eac7b458e4bfdec8fcc6984cdb6.1702593901.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
test_progs is better than a shell script b/c C is a bit easier to
maintain than shell. Also it's easier to use new infra like memory
mapped global variables from C via bpf skeleton.
Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a350db9e08520c64544562d88ec005a039124d9b.1702593901.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
vmlinux.h declarations are more ergnomic, especially when working with
kfuncs. The uapi headers are often incomplete for kfunc definitions.
This commit also switches bitfield accesses to use CO-RE helpers.
Switching to vmlinux.h definitions makes the verifier very
unhappy with raw bitfield accesses. The error is:
; md.u.md2.dir = direction;
33: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 +11)
misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-64+11 size 2
Fix by using CO-RE-aware bitfield reads and writes.
Co-developed-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/884bde1d9a351d126a3923886b945ea6b1b0776b.1702593901.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Verify, whether VLAN tag and proto are set correctly.
To simulate "stripped" VLAN tag on veth, send test packet from VLAN
interface.
Also, add TO_STR() macro for convenience.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205210847.28460-19-larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add VLAN hint to the xdp_hw_metadata program.
Also, to make metadata layout more straightforward, add flags field
to pass information about validity of every separate hint separately.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205210847.28460-17-larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Make VLAN c-tag and s-tag XDP hint testing more convenient
by not skipping VLAN-ed packets.
Allow both 802.1ad and 802.1Q headers.
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205210847.28460-16-larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a few tests that attempt to load BPF object containing privileged
map, program, and the one requiring mandatory BTF uploading into the
kernel (to validate token FD propagation to BPF_BTF_LOAD command).
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213190842.3844987-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add some tests that exercise BPF_CORE_WRITE_BITFIELD() macro. Since some
non-trivial bit fiddling is going on, make sure various edge cases (such
as adjacent bitfields and bitfields at the edge of structs) are
exercised.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/72698a1080fa565f541d5654705255984ea2a029.1702325874.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
This commit adds support for per-prog btf_custom_path. This is necessary
for testing CO-RE relocations on non-vmlinux types using test_loader
infrastructure.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/660ea7f2fdbdd5103bc1af87c9fc931f05327926.1702325874.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Add selftest that establishes dead code-eliminated valid global subprog
(global_dead) and makes sure that it's not possible to freplace it, as
it's effectively not there. This test will fail with unexpected success
before 2afae08c9d ("bpf: Validate global subprogs lazily").
v2->v3:
- add missing err assignment (Alan);
- undo unnecessary signature changes in verifier_global_subprogs.c (Eduard);
v1->v2:
- don't rely on assembly output in verifier log, which changes between
compiler versions (CI).
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211174131.2324306-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc can be used to count the number of
bits that are set in a struct cpumask* kptr. Let's add a selftest to
verify its behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207210843.168466-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add two tests validating that verifier's precision backtracking logic
handles BPF_ST_MEM instructions that produce fake register spill into
register slot. This is happening when non-zero constant is written
directly to a slot, e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 123.
Add both full 64-bit register spill, as well as 32-bit "sub-spill".
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209010958.66758-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Because test_bad_ret main program is not written in assembly, we don't
control instruction indices in timer_cb_ret_bad() subprog. This bites us
in timer/test_bad_ret subtest, where we see difference between cpuv4 and
other flavors.
For now, make __msg() expectations not rely on instruction indices by
anchoring them around bpf_get_prandom_u32 call. Once we have regex/glob
support for __msg(), this can be expressed a bit more nicely, but for
now just mitigating the problem with available means.
Fixes: e02dea158d ("selftests/bpf: validate async callback return value check correctness")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208233028.3412690-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack
memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses
were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted
above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the
stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but
otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the
stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places:
- in check_stack_slot_within_bounds()
- in check_stack_range_initialized()
This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests
that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were
changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior
persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it
can't run unprivileged for other reasons.
This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset
reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one
because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack
using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers
with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the
function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program
to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime
because a too small stack had been allocated for it.
Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in
bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by
update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access()
was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed
part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was
incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used
instead.
This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in
grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to
check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is
now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size.
check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been
allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue.
A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The
one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv.
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/
Adding test that tries to trigger the BUG_IN during early map update
in prog_array_map_poke_run function.
The idea is to share prog array map between thread that constantly
updates it and another one loading a program that uses that prog
array.
Eventually we will hit a place where the program is ok to be updated
(poke->tailcall_target_stable check) but the address is still not
registered in kallsyms, so the bpf_arch_text_poke returns -EINVAL
and cause imbalance for the next tail call update check, which will
fail with -EBUSY in bpf_arch_text_poke as described in previous fix.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206083041.1306660-3-jolsa@kernel.org
Enhance partial_stack_load_preserves_zeros subtest with detailed
precision propagation log checks. We know expect fp-16 to be spilled,
initially imprecise, zero const register, which is later marked as
precise even when partial stack slot load is performed, even if it's not
a register fill (!).
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Validate that 1-, 2-, and 4-byte loads from stack slots not aligned on
8-byte boundary still preserve zero, when loading from all-STACK_ZERO
sub-slots, or when stack sub-slots are covered by spilled register with
known constant zero value.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add tests validating that STACK_ZERO slots are preserved when slot is
partially overwritten with subregister spill.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a new selftests that validates precision tracking for stack access
instruction, using both r10-based and non-r10-based accesses. For
non-r10 ones we also make sure to have non-zero var_off to validate that
final stack offset is tracked properly in instruction history
information inside verifier.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed
register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through
read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it
*and* potentially adjusting offset.
To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into
instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame
number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction
history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's
checked most frequently during backtracking.
This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of
precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known
deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of
verified states, explored in the subsequent patches.
There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files
according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states).
File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF)
-------------------------------------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 2987 2864 -123 (-4.12%) 240 231 -9 (-3.75%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82848 82661 -187 (-0.23%) 5107 5073 -34 (-0.67%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 85116 84964 -152 (-0.18%) 5162 5130 -32 (-0.62%)
Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to
minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between
bpf and bpf-next trees.
Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of
instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of
relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we
already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we
added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but
also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we
don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is
present.
Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one
that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that.
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
xdp_metadata test is flaky sometimes:
verify_xsk_metadata:FAIL:rx_hash_type unexpected rx_hash_type: actual 8 != expected 0
Where 8 means XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_ANY and is exported from veth driver only when
'skb->l4_hash' condition is met. This makes me think that the program is
triggering again for some other packet.
Let's have a filter, similar to xdp_hw_metadata, where we trigger XDP kfuncs
only for UDP packets destined to port 8080.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204174423.3460052-1-sdf@google.com
There was some confusion amongst Meta sched_ext folks regarding whether
stashing bpf_rb_root - the tree itself, rather than a single node - was
supported. This patch adds a small test which demonstrates this
functionality: a local kptr with rb_root is created, a node is created
and added to the tree, then the tree is kptr_xchg'd into a mapval.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204211722.571346-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
