If an MST stream is enabled on a disconnected sink, the payload for the
stream is not created and the MST manager's payload count/next start VC
slot is not updated. Since the payload's start VC slot may still contain
a valid value (!= -1) the subsequent disabling of such a stream could
cause an incorrect decrease of the payload count/next start VC slot in
drm_dp_remove_payload() and hence later payload additions will fail.
Fix the above by marking the payload as invalid in the above case, so
that it's skipped during payload removal. While at it add a debug print
for this case.
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.1+
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221214184258.2869417-3-imre.deak@intel.com
After an error during receiving a packet for a multi-packet DP MST
sideband message, the state tracking which packets have been received
already is not reset. This prevents the reception of subsequent down
messages (due to the pending message not yet completed with an
end-of-message-transfer packet).
Fix the above by resetting the reception state after a packet error.
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.17+
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221214184258.2869417-2-imre.deak@intel.com
If the sink gets disconnected during receiving a multi-packet DP MST AUX
down-reply/up-request sideband message, the state keeping track of which
packets have been received already is not reset. This results in a failed
sanity check for the subsequent message packet received after a sink is
reconnected (due to the pending message not yet completed with an
end-of-message-transfer packet), indicated by the
"sideband msg set header failed"
error.
Fix the above by resetting the up/down message reception state after a
disconnect event.
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.17+
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221214184258.2869417-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Looks like that we're accidentally dropping a pretty important return code
here. For some reason, we just return -EINVAL if we fail to get the MST
topology state. This is wrong: error codes are important and should never
be squashed without being handled, which here seems to have the potential
to cause a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Fixes: 8ec046716c ("drm/dp_mst: Add helper to trigger modeset on affected DSC MST CRTCs")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Now that we've finally gotten rid of the non-atomic MST users leftover in
the kernel, we can finally get rid of all of the legacy payload code we
have and move as much as possible into the MST atomic state structs. The
main purpose of this is to make the MST code a lot less confusing to work
on, as there's a lot of duplicated logic that doesn't really need to be
here. As well, this should make introducing features like fallback link
retraining and DSC support far easier.
Since the old payload code was pretty gnarly and there's a Lot of changes
here, I expect this might be a bit difficult to review. So to make things
as easy as possible for reviewers, I'll sum up how both the old and new
code worked here (it took me a while to figure this out too!).
The old MST code basically worked by maintaining two different payload
tables - proposed_vcpis, and payloads. proposed_vcpis would hold the
modified payload we wanted to push to the topology, while payloads held the
payload table that was currently programmed in hardware. Modifications to
proposed_vcpis would be handled through drm_dp_allocate_vcpi(),
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), and drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(). Then, they
would be pushed via drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1() and
drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2().
Furthermore, it's important to note how adding and removing VC payloads
actually worked with drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1(). When a VC payload
is removed from the VC table, all VC payloads which come after the removed
VC payload's slots must have their time slots shifted towards the start of
the table. The old code handles this by looping through the entire payload
table and recomputing the start slot for every payload in the topology from
scratch. While very much overkill, this ends up doing the right thing
because we always order the VCPIs for payloads from first to last starting
timeslot.
It's important to also note that drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() isn't
actually limited to updating a single payload - the driver can use it to
queue up multiple payload changes so that as many of them can be sent as
possible before waiting for the ACT. This is -technically- not against
spec, but as Wayne Lin has pointed out it's not consistently implemented
correctly in hubs - so it might as well be.
drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() is pretty self explanatory and basically
the same between the old and new code, save for the fact we don't have a
second step for deleting payloads anymore -and thus rename it to
drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step2().
The new payload code stores all of the current payload info within the MST
atomic state and computes as much of the state as possible ahead of time.
This has the one exception of the starting timeslots for payloads, which
can't be determined at atomic check time since the starting time slots will
vary depending on what order CRTCs are enabled in the atomic state - which
varies from driver to driver. These are still stored in the atomic MST
state, but are only copied from the old MST state during atomic commit
time. Likewise, this is when new start slots are determined.
Adding/removing payloads now works much more closely to how things are
described in the spec. When we delete a payload, we loop through the
current list of payloads and update the start slots for any payloads whose
time slots came after the payload we just deleted. Determining the starting
time slots for new payloads being added is done by simply keeping track of
where the end of the VC table is in
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr->next_start_slot. Additionally, it's worth noting
that we no longer have a single update_payload() function. Instead, we now
have drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step1|2() and drm_dp_mst_remove_payload(). As
such, it's now left it up to the driver to figure out when to add or remove
payloads. The driver already knows when it's disabling/enabling CRTCs, so
it also already knows when payloads should be added or removed.
Changes since v1:
* Refactor around all of the completely dead code changes that are
happening in amdgpu for some reason when they really shouldn't even be
there in the first place… :\
* Remove mention of sending one ACT per series of payload updates. As Wayne
Lin pointed out, there are apparently hubs on the market that don't work
correctly with this scheme and require a separate ACT per payload update.
* Fix accidental drop of mst_mgr.lock - Wayne Lin
* Remove mentions of allowing multiple ACT updates per payload change,
mention that this is a result of vendors not consistently supporting this
part of the spec and requiring a unique ACT for each payload change.
* Get rid of reference to drm_dp_mst_port in DC - turns out I just got
myself confused by DC and we don't actually need this.
Changes since v2:
* Get rid of fix for not sending payload deallocations if ddps=0 and just
go back to wayne's fix
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-18-lyude@redhat.com
Currently, we set drm_dp_atomic_payload->time_slots to 0 in order to
indicate that we're about to delete a payload in the current atomic state.
Since we're going to be dropping all of the legacy code for handling the
payload table however, we need to be able to ensure that we still keep
track of the current time slot allocations for each payload so we can reuse
this info when asking the root MST hub to delete payloads. We'll also be
using it to recalculate the start slots of each VC.
So, let's keep track of the intent of a payload in drm_dp_atomic_payload by
adding ->delete, which we set whenever we're planning on deleting a payload
during the current atomic commit.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-16-lyude@redhat.com
We want to start cutting down on all of the places that we use port
validation, so that ports may be removed from the topology as quickly as
possible to minimize the number of errors we run into as a result of being
out of sync with the current topology status. This isn't a very typical
scenario and I don't think I've ever even run into it - but since the next
commit is going to make some changes to payload updates depending on their
hotplug status I think it's a probably good idea to take precautions.
Let's do this with CSNs by moving some code around so that we only queue
link address probing work at the end of handling all CSNs - allowing us to
make sure we drop as many topology references as we can beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-15-lyude@redhat.com
There's another kind of situation where we could potentially race with
nonblocking modesets and MST, especially if we were to only use the locking
provided by atomic modesetting:
* Display 1 begins as enabled on DP-1 in SST mode
* Display 1 switches to MST mode, exposes one sink in MST mode
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to disable the SST display
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to enable the MST display with a
different CRTC, but the SST display hasn't been fully taken down yet
* Execution order between the last two commits isn't guaranteed since they
share no drm resources
We can fix this however, by ensuring that we always pull in the atomic
topology state whenever a connector capable of driving an MST display
performs its atomic check - and then tracking CRTC commits happening on the
SST connector in the MST topology state. So, let's add some simple helpers
for doing that and hook them up in various drivers.
v2:
* Use intel_dp_mst_source_support() to check for MST support in i915, fixes
CI failures
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-14-lyude@redhat.com
Currently with the MST helpers we avoid releasing payloads _and_ avoid
pulling in the MST state if there aren't any actual payload changes. While
we want to keep the first step, we need to now make sure that we're always
pulling in the MST state on all modesets that can modify payloads - even if
the resulting payloads in the atomic state are identical to the previous
ones.
This is mainly to make it so that if a CRTC is still assigned to a
connector but is set to DPMS off, the CRTC still holds it's payload
allocation in the atomic state and still appropriately pulls in the MST
state for commit tracking. Otherwise, we'll occasionally forget to update
MST payloads from changes caused by non-atomic DPMS changes. Doing this
also allows us to track bandwidth limitations in a state correctly even
between DPMS changes, so that there's no chance of a simple ->active change
being rejected by the atomic check.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-11-lyude@redhat.com
I'm not sure why, but at the time I originally wrote the find/release time
slot helpers I thought we should avoid keeping modeset tracking out of the
MST helpers. In retrospect though there's no actual good reason to do
this, and the logic has ended up being identical across all the drivers
using the helpers. Also, it needs to be fixed anyway so we don't break
things when going atomic-only with MST.
So, let's just move this code into drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() and
stop open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-10-lyude@redhat.com
As Daniel Vetter pointed out, if we only use the atomic modesetting locks
with MST it's technically possible for a driver with non-blocking modesets
to race when it comes to MST displays - as we make the mistake of not doing
our own CRTC commit tracking in the topology_state object.
This could potentially cause problems if something like this happens:
* User starts non-blocking commit to disable CRTC-1 on MST topology 1
* User starts non-blocking commit to enable CRTC-2 on MST topology 1
There's no guarantee here that the commit for disabling CRTC-2 will only
occur after CRTC-1 has finished, since neither commit shares a CRTC - only
the private modesetting object for MST. Keep in mind this likely isn't a
problem for blocking modesets, only non-blocking.
So, begin fixing this by keeping track of which CRTCs on a topology have
changed by keeping track of which CRTCs we release or allocate timeslots
on. As well, add some helpers for:
* Setting up the drm_crtc_commit structs in the ->commit_setup hook
* Waiting for any CRTC dependencies from the previous topology state
v2:
* Use drm_dp_mst_atomic_setup_commit() directly - Jani
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-9-lyude@redhat.com
We already open-code this quite often, and will be iterating through
payloads even more once we've moved all of the payload tracking into the
atomic state. So, let's add a helper for doing this.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-8-lyude@redhat.com
For some reason we mention returning 0 if "slots have been added back to
drm_dp_mst_topology_state->avail_slots". This is totally misleading,
avail_slots is simply for figuring out the total number of slots available
in total on the topology and has no relation to the current payload
allocations.
So, let's get rid of that comment.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-6-lyude@redhat.com
VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this
code simply referred to timeslots vaguely as "slots" - and since I started
working on it and adding atomic functionality, the name "VCPI slots" has
been used to represent time slots.
Now that we actually have consistent access to the DisplayPort spec thanks
to VESA, I now know this isn't actually the proper term - as the
specification refers to these as time slots.
Since we're trying to make this code as easy to figure out as possible,
let's take this opportunity to correct this nomenclature and call them by
their proper name - timeslots. Likewise, we rename various functions
appropriately, along with replacing references in the kernel documentation
and various debugging messages.
It's important to note that this patch series leaves the legacy MST code
untouched for the most part, which is fine since we'll be removing it soon
anyhow. There should be no functional changes in this series.
v2:
* Add note that Wayne Lin from AMD suggested regarding slots being between
the source DP Tx and the immediate downstream DP Rx
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-5-lyude@redhat.com
In retrospect, the name I chose for this originally is confusing, as
there's a lot more info in here then just the VCPI. This really should be
called a payload. Let's make it more obvious that this is meant to be
related to the atomic state and is about payloads by renaming it to
drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload. Also, rename various variables throughout the
code that use atomic payloads.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-4-lyude@redhat.com
Currently, there is no way to identify if DSC pass-through can be
enabled and what aux DSC pass-through requests ought to be sent to. So,
add a variable to struct drm_dp_mst_port that keeps track of the
aforementioned information.
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drm_dp_dpcd_read returns the number of bytes read. The previous code
would print garbage on DPCD error, and would exit with on error on
success.
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Fixes: cb897542c6 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix W=1 warnings")
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/473500/
Drive-by cleanup, we don't need to validate the port references here as we
already previously went through the effort of refactoring things such that
we're guaranteed to be able to access ->mstb and ->port safely from
drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address(), since the only two places in the
codebase that drop an MST reference in such a way that it would remove it
from the topology are both protected under probe_lock.
Thanks for that, past Lyude!
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220602201757.30431-2-lyude@redhat.com
drm_crtc.h has no need for drm_edid.h, so don't include it.
Avoids useless rebuilds of the entire universe when
touching drm_edid.h.
Quite a few placs do currently depend on drm_edid.h without
actually including it directly. All of those need to be fixed
up.
v2: Fix up i915 and msm some more
v3: Fix alphabetical ordering (Sam)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220614090245.30283-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The WD22TB4 Thunderbolt dock at least will revert its DP_MAX_LINK_RATE
from HBR3 to HBR2 after system suspend/resume if the DP_DP13_DPCD_REV
registers are not read subsequently also as required.
Fix this by reading DP_DP13_DPCD_REV registers as well, matching what is
done during connector detection. While at it also fix up the same call
in drm_dp_mst_dump_topology().
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5292
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.14+
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220614094537.885472-1-imre.deak@intel.com
[Why]
It's reasonable that we receive NAK while doing DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ.
Downstream device might reply NAK with the reason and source should
react accordingly.
e.g.
1. When downstream device can't handle corresponding message in time,
it then replies NAK as reason been set as DEFER.
2. When multi-function branch-sink device doesn't enumerate virtual
DP peer devices for those multi-function down facing ports. Without
virtual DPCD, branch device might reply NAK with reason as BAD_PARAM
indicating this port can't do aux DPCD read.
It's expected result. Not an error.
[How]
Use drm_dbg_kms() to replace drm_err() when receive NAK.
Changes since v1:
* drm_dp_mst_topology.c file path changed. Folder was rename from
'dp' to 'display'
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
[fixed some indenting issues]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220428124944.1683680-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
Rename dp/ to display/ to account for additional display-related
helpers, such as HDMI. Update all related include statements. No
functional changes.
Various drivers, such as i915 and amdgpu, use similar naming scheme
by putting code for video-output standards into a local display/
directory. The new directory's name is aligned with this convention.
v2:
* update commit message (Javier)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220421073108.19226-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
2022-04-25 11:17:45 +02:00
Renamed from drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c (Browse further)
