PSR registers are a mess, some have the full address while others just
have the additional offset from psr_mmio_base.
For BDW+ psr_mmio_base is nothing more than TRANSCODER_EDP_OFFSET +
0x800 and using it makes more difficult for people with an PSR
register address or PSR register name from from BSpec as i915 also
don't match the BSpec names.
For HSW psr_mmio_base is _DDI_BUF_CTL_A + 0x800 and PSR registers are
only available in DDIA.
Other reason to make relative to transcoder is that since BDW every
transcoder have PSR registers, so in theory it should be possible to
have PSR enabled in a non-eDP transcoder.
So for BDW+ we can use _TRANS2() to get the register offset of any
PSR register in any transcoder while for HSW we have _HSW_PSR_ADJ
that will calculate the register offset for the single PSR instance,
noting that we are already guarded about trying to enable PSR in other
port than DDIA on HSW by the 'if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A)' in
intel_psr_compute_config(), this check should only be valid for HSW
and will be changed in future.
PSR2 registers and PSR_EVENT was added after Haswell so that is why
_PSR_ADJ() is not used in some macros.
The only registers that can not be relative to transcoder are
PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR that are not relative to anything, so keeping it
hardcoded. That changed for TGL but it will be handled in another
patch.
Also removing BDW_EDP_PSR_BASE from GVT because it is not used as it
is the only PSR register that GVT have.
v5:
- Macros changed to be more explicit about HSW (Dhinakaran)
- Squashed with the patch that added the tran parameter to the
macros (Dhinakaran)
v6:
- Checking for interruption errors after module reload in the
transcoder that will be used (Dhinakaran)
- Using lowercase to the registers offsets
v7:
- Removing IS_HASWELL() from registers macros(Jani)
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190820223325.27490-1-jose.souza@intel.com
To reduce the number of explicit dev_priv->uncore calls in the display
code ahead of the introduction of dev_priv->de_uncore, this patch
introduces a wrapper for one of the main usages of it, the register
waits. When we transition to the new uncore, we can just update the
wrapper to point to the appropriate structure.
Since the vast majority of waits are on a set or clear of a bit or mask,
add set & clear flavours of the wrapper to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816012343.36433-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types
related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to
reflect the facts.
There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file
where it logically belongs and naming according to contents.
v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806113933.11799-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
To do frontbuffer tracking we are depending on Display WA #0884 to
exit PSR when there is a frontbuffer modification but according to
user reports a write to CURSURFLIVE do not cause PSR to exit in older
gens so lets force a PSR exit.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110799
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Rohwer <trohwer85@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190617195154.30292-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613084416.6794-3-jani.nikula@intel.com
