Rename dp/ to display/ to account for additional display-related
helpers, such as HDMI. Update all related include statements. No
functional changes.
Various drivers, such as i915 and amdgpu, use similar naming scheme
by putting code for video-output standards into a local display/
directory. The new directory's name is aligned with this convention.
v2:
* update commit message (Javier)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220421073108.19226-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
Two digits are swapped in the AUO B133UAN01 panel id (0x8495 instead
of 0x8594). This went initially unnoticed because the panel is still
detected, though it is set up with a conservative default timing. Fix
the digit swap.
Fixes: ec57376fba ("drm/panel-edp: Add AUO B133UAN01")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220330090435.1.Id1522250dd07a6b574c1cc7826023fc6acd141b4@changeid
Add panel identification entry for the sharp LQ140M1JW46 eDP panel
with power sequencing delay information.
Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1647452154-16361-5-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com
Recently we added generic "edp-panel"s probed by EDID. To support
panels in this way we look at the panel ID in the EDID and look up the
panel in a table that has power sequence timings. If we find a panel
that's not in the table we will still attempt to use it but we'll use
conservative timings. While it's likely that these conservative
timings will work for most nearly all panels, the performance of
turning the panel off and on suffers.
We'd like to be able to reliably detect the case that we're using the
hardcoded timings without relying on parsing dmesg. This allows us to
implement tests that ensure that no devices get shipped that are
relying on the conservative timings.
Let's add a new debugfs entry to panel devices. It will have one of:
* UNKNOWN - We tried to detect a panel but it wasn't in our table.
* HARDCODED - We're not using generic "edp-panel" probed by EDID.
* A panel name - This is the name of the panel from our table.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220204161245.v2.3.I209d72bcc571e1d7d6b793db71bf15c9c0fc9292@changeid
Recently we added generic "edp-panel"s probed by EDID. To support
panels in this way we look at the panel ID in the EDID and look up the
panel in a table that has power sequence timings. If we find a panel
that's not in the table we will still attempt to use it but we'll use
conservative timings. While it's likely that these conservative
timings will work for most nearly all panels, the performance of
turning the panel off and on suffers.
We'd like to be able to reliably detect the case that we're using the
hardcoded timings without relying on parsing dmesg. This allows us to
implement tests that ensure that no devices get shipped that are
relying on the conservative timings.
Let's add a new sysfs entry to panel devices. It will have one of:
* UNKNOWN - We tried to detect a panel but it wasn't in our table.
* HARDCODED - We're not using generic "edp-panel" probed by EDID.
* A panel name - This is the name of the panel from our table.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220125135406.1.I62322abf81dbc1a1b72392a093be0c767da9bf51@changeid
We have added corresponding information:
[BOE]NV116WHM-N45 use delay_200_500_e50
[KDB]116N29-30NK-C007 use delay_200_500_e80_d50
[STA]2081116HHD028001-51D use delay_100_500_e200
Add 3 panels & 2 delay.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Jia <yunlong.jia@ecs.corp-partner.google.com>
Signed-off-by: Grace Mi <grace.mi@ecs.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220120064457.1.I337b8db7efaba8eb9c0ffd4da0d8c8133faf6f19@changeid
The edp_panel_entry members 'delay' and 'name' are documented, but
without the correct syntax for kernel doc.
This generates the following warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c:204: warning: Function parameter or member 'delay' not described in 'edp_panel_entry'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c:204: warning: Function parameter or member 'name' not described in 'edp_panel_entry'
Fix them accordingly.
Fixes: 5540cf8f3e ("drm/panel-edp: Implement generic "edp-panel"s probed by EDID")
Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211117163239.529781-1-kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com
As discussed in the patch ("dt-bindings: drm/panel-simple: Introduce
generic eDP panels") we can actually support probing eDP panels at
runtime instead of hardcoding what panel is connected. Add support to
the panel-edp driver for this.
We'll implement a solution like this:
* We'll read in two delays from the device tree that are used for
powering up the panel the initial time (to read the EDID).
* In the EDID we can find a 32-bit ID that identifies what panel we've
found. From this ID we can look up the full set of delays.
After this change we'll still need to add per-panel delays into the
panel-simple driver but we will no longer need to specify exactly
which panel is connected to which board in the device tree. Nicely,
any panels that are only supported this way also don't need to
hardcode mode data since it's guaranteed that we can get that through
the EDID.
This patch will seed the ID-to-delay table with a few panels that I
have access to, many of which are on sc7180-trogdor devices.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.15.Id9c96cba4eba3e5ee519bfb09cd64b39f2490293@changeid
While cleaning up the descriptions of the delay for eDP panels I
realized that we'd have a bug if any panels need the
"prepare_to_enable" but HPD handling isn't happening in the panel
driver. Let's put in a stopgap to at least make us not violate
timings. This is not perfectly optimal but trying to do better is
hard. At the moment only 2 panels specify this delay and only 30 ms is
at stake. These panels are also currently hooked up with "hpd-gpios"
so effectively this "fix" is just a theoretical fix and won't actually
do anything for any devices currently supported in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.13.Ia8288d36df4b12770af59ae3ff73ef7e08fb4e2e@changeid
Now that the delays are named / described with eDP-centric names, it
becomes clear that we should really specify the "hpd_reliable" and
"hpd_absent" separately without taking the other into account. Let's
fix it.
This should be a no-op change and just adjust how we specify
things. The actual delays should be the same before and after for the
one panel that currently species both "hpd_reliable" and "hpd_absent".
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.12.I2522235fca3aa6790ede0bf22a93d79a1f694e6b@changeid
Now that the eDP panel driver only handles eDP panels we can make
better sense of the delays here. Let's describe them in terms of the
standard eDP timing diagram from the eDP spec.
As part of this, it becomes pretty clear that some eDP panels have too
long of a "hpd_reliable_delay". This used to be the "prepare"
delay. It's the fixed delay that we do in the panel driver after
powering on our panel before we look at the HPD signal. To understand
this better, first realize that there could be 3 paths we follow
depending on how HPD is hooked up. Let's walk through them:
1. HPD is handled by the eDP controller driver. Until "recently"
(commit 48834e6084 ("drm/panel-simple: Support hpd-gpios for
delaying prepare()") in May 2020) this was the only supported
way. This is supposed to be when the controller driver gets HPD
straight to a dedicated pin. In this case the controller driver
should be waiting for HPD in its pre_enable() routine which should
be called right after the panel's prepare() function is
called. That means that the old "prepare" delay was only needed as
a delay after powering the panel but before looking at HPD.
2. HPD is handled via hpd-gpios in the panel. This is much like #1 but
much easier to follow since all the handling is in the panel
driver.
3. The no-hpd case. This is also easy to follow.
In any case, even though it seems like some old panel data was using
this incorrectly, let's not touch the old data structures but we'll
add a note indicating that something seems off.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.11.I2d798dd015332661c5895ef744bc8ec5cd2e06ca@changeid
In the case where we can read an EDID for a panel the only part of the
panel description that can't be found directly from the EDID is the
description of the delays. Let's break the delay structure out so that
we can specify just the delays for panels that are detected by EDID.
This is simple code motion. No functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.10.I24f3646dd09954958645cc05c538909f169bf362@changeid
Not all panels in panel-simple were marked what type of panel they
were. I searched through ARM/ARM64 Chromebooks or Chromebook-related
reference boards that I was aware of and found some panels that needed
to be moved. I also skimmed for panels that had no mode and were "big"
since it's quite rare to see a small eDP panel. Here's what I found:
* auo,b101ean01 - rk3288-veyron-minnie
* auo,b133htn01 - exynos5800-peach-pi
* auo,b133xtn01 - tegra124-nyan-big
* boe,nv101wxmn51 - rk3399-gru-bob
* innolux,p120zdg-bf1 - sdm845-cheza
* lg,lp079qx1-sp0v - rk3399-evb and similar
* lg,lp097qx1-spa1 - According to commit 0355dde26e ("drm/panel:
simple: Add support for LG LP097QX1-SPA1 panel") this is an eDP
panel.
* lg,lp129qe - tegra124-venice2
* samsung,lsn122dl01-c01 - According to commit 0330eaf390
("drm/panel: simple: Add support for Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 panel")
this is an eDP panel.
* samsung,ltn140at29-301 - tegra124-nyan-blaze
* sharp,ld-d5116z01b - According to commit cd5e1cbe1f ("drm/panel:
simple: Add support for Sharp LD-D5116Z01B panel") this is an eDP
panel.
* sharp,lq123p1jx31 - rk3399-gru-kevin
* starry,kr122ea0sra - rk3399-gru-gru (reference board, not upstream)
I won't promise that I didn't miss a single panel, but that's fairly
complete I think.
I'm not sure the full impact of the fact that they didn't have the
connector type specified, but at least as of commit 9f069c6fbc
("drm/panel: panel-simple: add default connector_type") we may have
been accidentally thinking of them as DPI panels. We also would
certainly have had a warning. In any case since we don't want to
support anything eDP in the old simple-panel driver, we should move
these.
Cc: Yakir Yang <ykk@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.8.I84e36f9f86d5d693fce0641a55ddb264a518a947@changeid
The panel-simple driver handles way too much. Let's start trying to
get a handle on it by splitting out the eDP panels. This patch does
this:
1. Start by copying simple-panel verbatim over to a new driver,
simple-panel-edp.
2. Rename "panel_simple" to "panel_edp" in the new driver.
3. Keep only panels marked with `DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP` in the new
driver. Remove those panels from the old driver.
4. Remove all recent "DP AUX bus" stuff from the old driver. The DP
AUX bus is only possible on DP panels.
5. Remove all DSI / MIPI related functions from the new driver.
6. Remove bus_format / bus_flags from eDP driver. These things don't
seem to make any sense for eDP panels so let's stop filling in made
up stuff.
In the end we end up with a bunch of duplicated code for now. Future
patches will try to address _some_ of this duplicated code though some
of it will be unavoidable.
NOTE: This may not actually move all eDP panels over to the new driver
since not all panels were properly marked with
`DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP`. A future patch will attempt to move wayward
panels I could identify but even so there may be some missed.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914132020.v5.7.I0a2f75bb822d17ce06f5b147734764eeb0c3e3df@changeid
