Move all DPFC_CHICKEN programming into intel_fbc_program_workarounds().
We already have one thing programmed there, whereas the rest is strewn
about in intel_display_wa_apply() and init_clock_gating(). Since we have
a single place doing all the programming (and it's serialized by the
crtc commits) there should be no danger of rmw races.
Other FBC related workarounds also exist, but those require fiddling
with other registers that may also get programmed from other places,
so we'll need to think harder what to do with those.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240123090051.29818-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Several of the register updates that are currently done in the clock
gating init functions are actually display workarounds that should move
into the display-specific part of the code. Furthermore, some of the
registers being programmed don't even have anything to do with clock
gating at all.
Extract the display workarounds for gen11 and later platforms to a
dedicated display/intel_display_wa.c file to keep these separate from
the SOC / sgunit clock gating that we need on some platforms. The gen11
cutoff here is selected somewhat arbitrarily; this is the point where
workarounds were first assigned dedicated lineage numbers that can be
easily looked up and confirmed in the modern workaround database. It
also avoids any confusion on older platforms where the exact boundaries
between display/GT/other IP blocks wasn't as well-defined as it is
today.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230907001009.3732474-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
