When determining various scanlines for DSB use we should take into
account whether VRR is active at the time when the DSB uses said
scanline information. For now all DSB scanline usage occurs prior
to the actual commit, so we only need to care about the state of
VRR at that time.
I've decided to move intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw() in its entirety
to the DSB code as it will also need to know the actual state
of VRR in order to do its job 100% correctly.
TODO: figure out how much of this could be moved to some
more generic place and perhaps be shared with the CPU
vblank evasion code/etc...
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Currently we switch from out software idea of a scanline
to the hw's idea of a scanline during the commit phase in
_intel_dsb_commit(). While that is slightly easier due to
fastsets fiddling with the timings, we'll also need to
generate proper hw scanline numbers already when emitting
DSB scanline wait instructions. So this approach won't
do in the future. Switch to hw scanline numbers earlier.
Also intel_dsb_dewake_scanline() itself already makes
some assumptions about VRR that don't take into account
VRR toggling during fastsets, so technically delaying
the sw->hw conversion doesn't even help us.
The other reason for delaying the conversion was that we
are using intel_get_crtc_scanline() during intel_dsb_commit()
which gives us the current sw scanline. But this is pretty
low level stuff anyway so just using raw PIPEDSL reads seems
fine here, and that of course gives us the hw scanline
directly, reducing the need to do so many conversions.
v2: Return the non-hw scanline from intel_dsb_dewake_scanline()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
The DSB code will need to know the hardware's idea of vertical
active, as that is also what defines the start of undelayed
vblank. Introduce a helper that gives us that information,
in line with the other intel_mode_v*() functions.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240611133344.30673-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add a helper to convert our idea of a scanline to the hw's idea
of the same scanline (ie. apply crtc->scanline_offset in reverse).
We'll need this to tell the DSB do stuff on a specific scanline.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
In order to move VRR enable/disable to a place where it's also
applicable to fastsets we need to be prepared to configure
the pipe into non-VRR mode initially, and then later switch
to VRR mode. To that end allow the active timings to be configured
in non-VRR mode temporarily even when the crtc_state says we're
going to be using VRR.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230320203352.19515-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Move intel_crtc_update_active_timings() into intel_vblank.c
where it more properly belongs.
Also do the s/dev_priv/i915/ modernization rename while at it.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230310235828.17439-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
