This reverts commit 8ebb1fc2e6.
The panel should be handled through the samsung-atna33xc20 driver for
correct power up timings. Otherwise the backlight does not work correctly.
We have existing users of this panel through the generic "edp-panel"
compatible (e.g. the Qualcomm X1E80100 CRD), but the screen works only
partially in that configuration: It works after boot but once the screen
gets disabled it does not turn on again until after reboot. It behaves the
same way with the default "conservative" timings, so we might as well drop
the configuration from the panel-edp driver. That way, users with old DTBs
will get a warning and can move to the new driver.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240715-x1e80100-crd-backlight-v2-2-31b7f2f658a3@linaro.org
At shutdown if you've got a _properly_ coded DRM modeset driver then
you'll get these two warnings at shutdown time:
Skipping disable of already disabled panel
Skipping unprepare of already unprepared panel
These warnings are ugly and sound concerning, but they're actually a
sign of a properly working system. That's not great.
We're not ready to get rid of the calls to drm_panel_disable() and
drm_panel_unprepare() because we're not 100% convinced that all DRM
modeset drivers are properly calling drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() or
drm_helper_force_disable_all() at the right times. However, having the
warning show up for correctly working systems is bad.
As a bit of a workaround, add some "if" tests to try to avoid the
warning on correctly working systems. Also add some comments and
update the TODO items in the hopes that future developers won't be too
confused by what's going on here.
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240621134427.1.Ieb287c2c3ee3f6d3b0d5f49b29f746b93621749c@changeid
The panel-edp driver supports legacy compatible strings for several eDP
panels which were never used in DT files present in Linux tree and most
likely have never been used with the upstream kernel. Drop compatibles
for these panels in favour of using a generic "edp-panel" device on the
AUX bus.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240614-edp-panel-drop-v4-3-4e0a112eec46@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Add a fat warning against adding new panel compatibles to the panel-edp
driver. All new users of the eDP panels are supposed to use the generic
"edp-panel" compatible device on the AUX bus. The remaining compatibles
are either used by the existing DT or were used previously and are
retained for backwards compatibility.
Suggested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240614-edp-panel-drop-v4-1-4e0a112eec46@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Same as commit 7c8690d8fc ("drm/panel-edp: Add some panels with
conservative timings"), the 3 panels added in this patch are used by
Mediatek MT8173 Chromebooks and they used to work with the downstream
v4.19 kernel without any specified delay.
These panel IDs were found from in-field reports, but their datahseets
are not available. For BOE 0x0623 and SHP 0x153a, their product names
are retrieved from the EDIDs. The EDID of AUO 0x1999 does not contain
such information, so list as "Unknown" in this patch.
Update these entries with less-conservative timings from other panels of
the same vendor.
Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240527095511.719825-3-treapking@chromium.org
As talked about in commit d2aacaf073 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240503143327.RFT.v2.6.I4d1bf08781593c08127e506422687ab19fd3c824@changeid
As evidenced by in-field reports, this panel shipped on pompom but we
never added the ID and thus we're stuck w/ conservative timings. The
panel was part of early patches but somehow got left off in the
end. :( Add it in now.
For future reference, EDID from this panel is:
00ffffffffffff002c82121200000000
321e0104951a0e780ae511965e55932c
19505400000001010101010101010101
010101010101a41f5686500084302820
55000090100000180000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000fe
004b443131364e3039333041313600f6
We use the ASCII string from decoding the EDID ("KD116N0930A16") as
the panel name.
Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240502164746.1.Ia32fc630e5ba41b3fdd3666d9e343568e03c4f3a@changeid
If we're using the AUX channel for eDP backlight and it fails to probe
for some reason, let's _not_ fail the panel probe.
At least one case where we could fail to init the backlight is because
of a dead or physically missing panel. As talked about in detail in
the earlier patch in this series, ("drm/panel-edp: If we fail to
powerup/get EDID, use conservative timings"), this can cause the
entire system's display pipeline to fail to come up and that's
non-ideal.
If we fail to init the backlight for some transitory reason, we should
dig in and see if there's a way to fix this (perhaps retries?). Even
in that case, though, having a panel whose backlight is stuck at 100%
(the default, at least in the panel Samsung ATNA33XC20 I tested) is
better than having no panel at all.
Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240325145626.3.I552e8af0ddb1691cc0fe5d27ea3d8020e36f7006@changeid
If at boot we fail to power up the eDP panel (most often happens if
the eDP panel never asserts HPD to us) or if we are unable to read the
EDID at bootup to figure out the panel's ID then let's use the
conservative eDP panel powerup/powerdown timings but _not_ fail the
probe.
It might seem strange to _not_ fail the probe in this case since we
were unable to powerup the panel and confirm it's there. However,
there is a reason to do this. Specifically, if we fail to probe the
panel then it really throws the whole display pipeline for loop. Most
DRM subsystems are written so that they wait until all components
(including the panel) have probed before they set everything up. When
the panel doesn't come up then this never happens. As a side effect of
not setting everything up then other display adapters don't get
initialized. As a practical example, I can see that if I open up a
sc7180-trogdor based Chromebook that's using the generic "edp-panel"
and unplug the eDP panel that it causes the _external_ DP monitor not
to function. This is obviously bad because it means that a device with
a dead eDP panel becomes e-waste when it could instead still be given
useful life with an external display.
NOTES:
- When we fail to probe like this, boot is a bit slow because we try
several times to power the panel up. This doesn't feel horrible
because it'll eventually work and the retries are known to help
bring some panels up.
- In the case where we hit the condition of failing to power up, the
display will likely _never_ have a chance to work again until
reboot. Once the panel-edp pm_runtime resume function fails it
doesn't ever seem to retry. This is probably for the best given that
we don't have any real timing/modes. eDP isn't expected to be
"hotplugged" so this makes some sense.
- It turns out that this makes panel-edp behave more similarly for
users of the generic "edp-panel" compatible string and the old fixed
panel compatible string. With the old fixed panel compatible string
we don't talk to the panel during probe so we'd actually behave much
the same way that we'll now behave for the generic "edp-panel".
Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240325145626.2.Ia7a55a9657b0b6aa4644fd497a0bc595a771258c@changeid
If we're using the generic "edp-panel" compatible string and we fail
to detect an eDP panel then we fall back to conservative timings for
powering up and powering down the panel. Abstract out the function for
setting these timings so it can be used in future patches.
No functional change expected--just code movement.
Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240325145626.1.I659b2517d9f619d09e804e071591ecab76335dfb@changeid
There are 2 different AUO panels using the same panel id. One of the
variants requires using overridden modes to resolve glitching issue as
described in commit 70e0d5550f ("drm/panel-edp: Add auo_b116xa3_mode").
Other variants should use the modes parsed from EDID.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240307230653.1807557-6-hsinyi@chromium.org
It's found that some panels have variants that they share the same panel id
although their EDID and names are different. When matching generic edp
panels, we should first match with both panel identity, which contains both
panel id and panel name. If not found, match with panel id only.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240307230653.1807557-5-hsinyi@chromium.org
It's found that some panels have variants that they share the same panel id
although their EDID and names are different. Besides panel id, now we need
more information from the EDID base block to distinguish these panel
variants.
Add drm_edid_read_base_block() to return the EDID base block, which is
wrapped in struct drm_edid.
Caller can further use it to get panel id or check if the block contains
certain strings, such as panel name.
Merge drm_edid_get_panel_id() and edid_extract_panel_id() into one
function.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240307230653.1807557-2-hsinyi@chromium.org
For MNC207QS1-1 panel, Splash screen occur when switch from VT1 to VT2.
The BL_EN signal does not conform to the VESA protocol.
BL_EN signal needs to be pulled high after video signal.
So add prepare_to_enable to 200ms.
[ dianders: Adjusted subject prefix and added Fixes tag ]
Fixes: 0547692ac1 ("drm/panel-edp: Add several generic edp panels")
Signed-off-by: Zhengqiao Xia <xiazhengqiao@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240301084006.14422-1-xiazhengqiao@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
If an eDP panel is not powered on then any attempts to talk to it over
the DP AUX channel will timeout. Unfortunately these attempts may be
quite slow. Userspace can initiate these attempts either via a
/dev/drm_dp_auxN device or via the created i2c device.
Making the DP AUX drivers timeout faster is a difficult proposition.
In theory we could just poll the panel's HPD line in the AUX transfer
function and immediately return an error there. However, this is
easier said than done. For one thing, there's no hard requirement to
hook the HPD line up for eDP panels and it's OK to just delay a fixed
amount. For another thing, the HPD line may not be fast to probe. On
parade-ps8640 we need to wait for the bridge chip's firmware to boot
before we can get the HPD line and this is a slow process.
The fact that the transfers are taking so long to timeout is causing
real problems. The open source fwupd daemon sometimes scans DP busses
looking for devices whose firmware need updating. If it happens to
scan while a panel is turned off this scan can take a long time. The
fwupd daemon could try to be smarter and only scan when eDP panels are
turned on, but we can also improve the behavior in the kernel.
Let's let eDP panels drivers specify that a panel is turned off and
then modify the common AUX transfer code not to attempt a transfer in
this case.
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240202141109.1.I24277520ac754ea538c9b14578edc94e1df11b48@changeid
This reverts commit 70e0d5550f.
The overridden mode fixes the panel glitching issue on mt8186 chromebook.
However, it causes the internal display not working on mt8173 chromebook.
Revert the overridden mode for now to let mt8173 have a functional display.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240214072435.1496536-2-hsinyi@chromium.org
Some edp panel requires T10 (Delay from end of valid video data transmitted
by the Source device to power-off) less than 500ms. Using autosuspend with
delay set as 1000 violates this requirement.
Use put_sync_suspend in unprepare to meet the spec. For other cases (such
as getting EDID), it still uses autosuspend.
Suggested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Fixes: 3235b0f20a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare")
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231220221418.2610185-1-hsinyi@chromium.org
These panels are used by Mediatek MT8173 Chromebooks, and they used to
work with the downstream v4.19 kernel without any specified delay.
Back in the v4.19 kernel, they used the "little white lie" approach,
which is making the devicetree claim a specific panel's compatible
string for many different panels. That was a common solution before the
generic edp-panel driver.
After we uprevved the device to a newer kernel and used the edp-panel
driver, we saw multiple devices reporting warnings of using an unknown
panel and falling back to the conservative timings, which means that
they turn on/off much more slowly than they should. We tried to fill in
the timings for those panels, but we failed to find all the data sheets
for them.
Therefore, instead of having them use the default conservative timings,
update them with less-conservative timings from other panels of the same
vendor. The panels should still work under those timings, and we can
save some delays and suppress the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231214152817.2766280-4-treapking@chromium.org
Add the support of powered_on_to_enable delay as the minimum time that
needs to have passed between the panel powered on and enable may begin.
This delay is seen in BOE panels as the minimum delay of T3+T4+T5+T6+T8
in the eDP timing diagrams.
Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231214152817.2766280-2-treapking@chromium.org
If a non generic edp-panel is under aux-bus, the mode read from edid would
still be selected as preferred and results in multiple preferred modes,
which is ambiguous.
If both hard-coded mode and edid exists, only add mode from hard-coded.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231117215056.1883314-4-hsinyi@chromium.org
Add auo_b116xa3_mode to override the original modes parsed from edid
of the panels 0x405c B116XAK01.0 and 0x615c B116XAN06.1 which result
in glitches on panel.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231117215056.1883314-3-hsinyi@chromium.org
Generic edp gets mode from edid. However, some panels report incorrect
mode in this way, resulting in glitches on panel. Introduce a new quirk
additional_mode to the generic edid to pick a correct hardcoded mode.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231117215056.1883314-2-hsinyi@chromium.org
Rename AUO 0x235c B116XTN02 to B116XTN02.3 according to decoding edid.
Fixes: 3db2420422 ("drm/panel-edp: Add AUO B116XTN02, BOE NT116WHM-N21,836X2, NV116WHM-N49 V8.0")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231107204611.3082200-3-hsinyi@chromium.org
Rename AUO 0x405c B116XAK01 to B116XAK01.0 and adjust the timing of
auo_b116xak01: T3=200, T12=500, T7_max = 50 according to decoding edid
and datasheet.
Fixes: da458286a5 ("drm/panel: Add support for AUO B116XAK01 panel")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231107204611.3082200-2-hsinyi@chromium.org
In commit 5f04e7ce39 ("drm/panel-edp: Split eDP panels out of
panel-simple") I moved a pile of panels out of panel-simple driver
into the newly created panel-edp driver. One of those panels, however,
shouldn't have been moved.
As is clear from commit e35e305eff ("drm/panel: simple: Add AUO
B116XW03 panel support"), AUX B116XW03 is an LVDS panel. It's used in
exynos5250-snow and exynos5420-peach-pit where it's clear that the
panel is hooked up with LVDS. Furthermore, searching for datasheets I
found one that makes it clear that this panel is LVDS.
As far as I can tell, I got confused because in commit 88d3457ceb
("drm/panel: auo,b116xw03: fix flash backlight when power on") Jitao
Shi added "DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP". That seems wrong. Looking at the
downstream ChromeOS trees, it seems like some Mediatek boards are
using a panel that they call "auo,b116xw03" that's an eDP panel. The
best I can guess is that they actually have a different panel that has
similar timing. If so then the proper panel should be used or they
should switch to the generic "edp-panel" compatible.
When moving this back to panel-edp, I wasn't sure what to use for
.bus_flags and .bus_format and whether to add the extra "enable" delay
from commit 88d3457ceb ("drm/panel: auo,b116xw03: fix flash
backlight when power on"). I've added formats/flags/delays based on my
(inexpert) analysis of the datasheet. These are untested.
NOTE: if/when this is backported to stable, we might run into some
trouble. Specifically, before 474c162878 ("arm64: dts: mt8183:
jacuzzi: Move panel under aux-bus") this panel was used by
"mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi", which assumed it was an eDP panel. I don't
know what to suggest for that other than someone making up a bogus
panel for jacuzzi that's just for the stable channel.
Fixes: 88d3457ceb ("drm/panel: auo,b116xw03: fix flash backlight when power on")
Fixes: 5f04e7ce39 ("drm/panel-edp: Split eDP panels out of panel-simple")
Tested-by: Anton Bambura <jenneron@postmarketos.org>
Acked-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230925150010.1.Iff672233861bcc4cf25a7ad0a81308adc3bda8a4@changeid
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
panel_edp_remove() always returned zero, so convert it to return void
without any loss and then just drop the return from
panel_edp_platform_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230530074216.2195962-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Add a panel entry with delay_200_500_e50 for the AUO NE135FBM-N41
version 8.1, found on a number of ACER laptops, including the
Swift 3 (SF313-52, SF313-53), Chromebook Spin 513 (CP513-2H) and
others.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230405100452.44225-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
