When bpf_jit_harden is toggled between 0 and 2, subprog jit may fail
due to inconsistent twice read values of bpf_jit_harden during jit. So
add a test to ensure the problem is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309123321.2400262-5-houtao1@huawei.com
If BPF code contains unused BPF subprogram and there are no other subprogram
calls (which can realistically happen in real-world applications given
sufficiently smart Clang code optimizations), libbpf will erroneously assume
that subprograms are entry-point programs and will attempt to load them with
UNSPEC program type.
Fix by not relying on subcall instructions and rather detect it based on the
structure of BPF object's sections.
Fixes: 9a94f277c4 ("tools: libbpf: restore the ability to load programs from .text section")
Reported-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <dbanschikov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201107000251.256821-1-andrii@kernel.org
Add a selftest excercising bpf-to-bpf subprogram calls, as well as multiple
entry-point BPF programs per section. Also make sure that BPF CO-RE works for
such set ups both for sub-programs and for multi-entry sections.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200903203542.15944-8-andriin@fb.com
