Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap.
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk!
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version
Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
More analysis shows that this is identical to 0x79 except that it loads
the frequency indirectly from elsewhere in the VBIOS.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Opcode 0x5a is a register write for data looked up from another part of
the VBIOS image. 0x59 is a more complex opcode, but we may as well
recognize it. These occur on a single known instance of Riva TNT2
hardware.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
nvbios_extend() returns 1 to indicate "extended the array" and 0 to
indicate the array is already big enough. This is used by the core
shadowing code to prevent re-fetching chunks of the image that have
already been shadowed.
The ACPI fetching code may possibly need to extend this further due
to requiring fetches to happen in 4KiB chunks.
Under certain circumstances (that happen if the total image size is
a multiple of 4KiB), the memory allocated to store the shadow will
already be big enough, causing the ACPI code's nvbios_extend() call
to return 0, which is misinterpreted as a failure.
The fix is simple, accept >= 0 as a successful condition here. The
core will have already made sure that we're not re-fetching data we
already have.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89047
v2 (Ben Skeggs):
- dropped hunk which would cause unnecessary re-fetching
- more descriptive explanation
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jano.vesely@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code before looked only at bit 31 to decide if a port is unused.
However dcb 4.1 spec says 0x1F in bits 31-27 and 26-22 means unused.
This fixed hdmi monitor detection on GM206.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The symlinks were annoying some people, and they're not used anywhere
else in the kernel tree. The include directory structure has been
changed so that symlinks aren't needed anymore.
NVKM has been moved from core/ to nvkm/ to make it more obvious as to
what the directory is for, and as some minor prep for when NVKM gets
split out into its own module (virt) at a later date.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
