In case of successful suspend, devinit will have to be run and this is
the behavior currently hardcoded. However, as FD bug 94725 suggests,
there might be cases where runtime suspend leaves the GPU powered, and
in such cases devinit should not be run on resume.
On GF100+ we have a reliable way to know whether we need to run devinit.
Use it instead of blindly trusting the flag set by nvkm_devinit_fini().
The code around the NvForcePost also needs to be slightly reworked in
order to keep working.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Suggested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
It is not advisable to perform devinit if it has already been done.
VBIOS will very likely have invoked devinit if the GPU is the primary
graphics device, but there is no accurate way to detect this fact yet.
This patch adds such a method for gf100 and later chips, by means of the
NV_PTOP_SCRATCH1_DEVINIT_COMPLETED bit. This bit is set to 1 by devinit,
and reset to 0 when the GPU is powered.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2015-01-22 12:17:52 +10:00
Renamed from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/devinit/nvc0.c (Browse further)
