When the PMU/SEC2 LS FWs have booted, they'll send a message to the host
with various information, including the configuration of message/command
queues that are available.
Move the handling for this to the relevant subdevs.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Code to interface with LS firmwares is being moved to the subdevs where it
belongs, rather than living in the common falcon code.
This is an incremental step towards that goal.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will allow us to register the falcon with ACR, and further customise
its behaviour by providing the nvkm_falcon_func structure directly.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's already a condition in place which attempts to detect this, but
since we've begun to require a PMU subdev even on boards where we don't
load a custom FW, it's become inaccurate.
This will prevent unnecessarily running a periodic fan update thread on
GP100 and newer, where we don't yet override the default PMU FW.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reading registers at device construction time can be harmful, as there
is no guarantee the underlying engine will be up, or in its runtime
configuration. Defer register reading to the oneinit() hook and update
users accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVIDIA-provided PMU firmware is controlled by a msgqueue. Add a member
to the PMU structure as well as the required cleanup code if this
feature is used.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some PMU implementations (in particular the ones managed by secure
boot) may not have a reset() hook. Make sure we don't crash in that
case.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used
by other subdevs (i.e. secboot).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a PMU constructor so implementations that extend the nvkm_pmu
structure can have all base members properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
When we start communicating with the pmu a bit more, the current code is
a real issue. I encountered a dead lock here, while testing my dynamic
reclocking code
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some devices may not have a PMU. Avoid a NULL pointer dereference in
such cases by checking whether the pointer given to nvkm_pmu_pgob() is
valid.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Switch to NVIDIA's name for the device.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
