fclk value is missing in pp_dpm_fclk. add this to correctly show the current value.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
fix the wrong fan speed in fan1_input when the fan control mode is manual.
the fan speed value is not correct when we set manual mode to fan1_enalbe - 1.
since the fan speed in the metrics table always reflects the real fan speed,we
can fetch the fan speed for both auto and manual mode.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix the function used for sienna cichlid to get correct PCIE information
by pp_dpm_pcie.
Signed-off-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. when smc feature bit isn't mapped,
the feature state isn't showed on sysfs node of pp_features.
2. add pp_features table title
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Drop navy_flounder hardcode of using soft pptable, so that it
can use pptable from vbios when available.
Signed-off-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
it will cause smu sysfs node of "pp_features" show error.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Disable/enable the GPO feature on UMD pstate entering/exiting.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For entering UMD stable Pstate, the operations to enter rlc_safe
mode, disable mgcg_perfmon and disable PCIE aspm are needed. And
the opposite operations should be performed on UMD stable Pstate
exiting.
V2: take those ASICs(CI/SI/VI) which may not support this into
consideration
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Populate current link speed, width and clock domain frequency.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As for other clock domains.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Representative checkpatch.pl warning
WARNING: adding a line without newline at end of file
30: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu11/vangogh_ppt.h:30:
+#endif
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
To avoid underflow seen on Polaris10 with some 3440x1440
144Hz displays. As the threshold of 190 us cuts too close
to minVBlankTime of 192 us.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GPU reset might get called during init time, before
sw_init has been called.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Per PMFW 59.7.0.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Update driver if version from 0x5 to 0x6 for dimgrey_cavefish, per PMFW 59.04.0.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Update driver if version from 0x4 to 0x5 for dimgrey_cavefish, per PMFW 59.02.0.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Update driver if version according to PMFW with version 0x003B0100.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
A longer chip name needs more space.
v2: define macro for the length of smu fw name
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
These were leftover from the initial implementation, but
never used. Drop them.
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Noticed-by: Ryan Taylor <ryan.taylor@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As the dpm clock table is needed during DC HW initialization.
And that (DC HW initialization) comes before smu_late_init()
where current APU dpm clock table setup is performed. So, NULL
pointer dereference will be triggered. By moving APU dpm clock
table setup to smu_hw_init(), this can be avoided.
Fixes: 02cf91c113 ("drm/amd/powerplay: postpone operations not required for hw setup to late_init")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reported-by: Dirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>
Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_pcie_table, instead of a one-element array, and use
the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7db0bc.7Xivn4K83f7XW0ug%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_voltage_lookup_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61df.jWrFfnjxGbjSkPOp%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_mm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a
one-element array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the
size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7d61e2.qiTVTyG2pVoG8bb0%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_ppt_v1_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433c.TTk9rnA+F58kyDUy%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have been multiplied it by
sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it
should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.iT%2FQTjN+659XUDo5%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_vce_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d35.pJToGs3H9khZK6ws%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
ptable->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_phase_shedding_limits_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d36.6PStUZp2HRxAz7IM%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_acp_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3c.TyfOhg%2FA6JycL6ZN%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have multiplied it by sizeof(phm_uvd_clock_voltage_dependency_record)
instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433e.pXkC6KsN6HN%2FLdhj%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_array, instead of a one-element array, and use the
struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c433f.ZyMD+YUIVAwiHGVe%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element
array, and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the
allocation.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c295c.8iqp1Ifc6oiVDq%2F%2F%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We want to use the dev_* functions here rather than the pr_* variants.
Switch to using dev_warn() which mirrors what we do on other asics.
Fixes the following build errors on ARC:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/navi10_ppt.c: In function 'navi10_fill_i2c_req':
../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/sienna_cichlid_ppt.c: In function 'sienna_cichlid_fill_i2c_req':
../arch/arc/include/asm/bug.h:24:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pr_warn'; did you mean 'drm_warn'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add vangogh ppt funcions into swSMU block.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to partially enable swSMU for vangogh for the moment.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Liu <aaron.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add smu initialize functions for vangogh.
v2: squash in updates
v3: drop duplicate table entries
v4: rebase fixes
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add vangogh asic name in smu v11.
v2: drop smu firmware name (N/A for VG)
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add smu v11.5 smc header for vangogh.
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add smu v11.5 firmware header for vangogh
v2: squash in updates
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add smu v11.5 driver interface header for vangogh.
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add new smu messages and feature masks for vangogh.
v2: squash in updates and typo fixes
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <xiaojian.du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We need to schedule the smu AC/DC interrupt ack to avoid
potentially sleeping if the smu message mutex is contended.
Fixes: e1188aacad ("drm/amdgpu/smu11: add support for SMU AC/DC interrupts")
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
So we can schedule work from interrupts. This might include
long tasks or things that could sleep.
Fixes: e1188aacad ("drm/amdgpu/smu11: add support for SMU AC/DC interrupts")
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The state array is in the reverse order compared to other asics
(high to low rather than low to high).
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1313
Reviewed-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add one sysfs file -- "pp_od_clk_voltage" for
Raven/Raven2/Picasso APU, which is only used by dGPU like VEGA10.
This sysfs file supports the feature to modify gfx engine clock(Mhz units), it can
be used to configure the min value and the max value for gfx clock limited in the
safe range.
Command guide:
echo "s level clock" > pp_od_clk_voltage
s - adjust teh sclk level
level - 0 or 1, "0" represents the min value, "1" represents the max value
clock - the clock value(Mhz units), like 400, 800 or 1200, the value must be within the
OD_RANGE limits.
Example:
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 200Mhz
1: 1400Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
$ echo "s 0 600" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ echo "s 1 1000" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 600Mhz
1: 1000Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Revert the guilty change introduced by the commit below:
drm/amd/pm: postpone SOCCLK/UCLK enablement after DAL initialization(V2)
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
