[Why & How]
Support dramclk change latency change via debug option and add some
code isolation.
Reviewed-by: Martin Leung <Martin.Leung@amd.com>
Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Charlene Liu <Charlene.Liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Currently, we are using soc._clock_tmp[] to temporarily store and modify
data from soc.clock_limits[] before copying it back into
soc.clock_limits[] (because modifying data directly in
soc.clock_limits[] causes unintended behavior). However, this approach
has a number of downsides, such as:
1. struct _vcs_dpi_soc_bounding_box_st's creation/destruction
aren't well defined (which could mean more unintended
behavior).
2. Throwing "temp" varibles in structs everywhere doesn't make
for a particularly readable codebase.
For these reasons, we should get rid of soc._clock_tmp[] by defining a
struct scratch within struct dc that, contains within it all of the
temporary variables (including _clock_tmp[]) such that it is obvious how
they are intended to be used.
Co-authored-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add missing headers to solve the following warnings from sparse:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:656:17: warning: symbol 'ddr4_wm_table_gs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:693:17: warning: symbol 'lpddr4_wm_table_gs' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:730:17: warning: symbol 'lpddr4_wm_table_with_disabled_ppt' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:767:17: warning: symbol 'ddr4_wm_table_rn' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:804:17: warning: symbol 'ddr4_1R_wm_table_rn' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c:841:17: warning: symbol 'lpddr4_wm_table_rn' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn301/dcn301_fpu.c:217:17: warning: symbol 'ddr4_wm_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn301/dcn301_fpu.c:254:17: warning: symbol 'lpddr5_wm_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn31/dcn31_fpu.c:53:30: warning: symbol 'dcn3_1_ip' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn31/dcn31_fpu.c:197:30: warning: symbol 'dcn3_15_ip' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn31/dcn31_fpu.c:293:30: warning: symbol 'dcn3_16_ip' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: 1a3408259b ("drm/amd/display: move FPU code on dcn21 clk_mgr")
Fixes: 5085e0361f ("drm/amd/display: move FPU code from dcn301 clk mgr to DML folder")
Fixes: 26f4712aed ("drm/amd/display: move FPU related code from dcn31 to dml/dcn31 folder")
Fixes: fa896297b3 ("drm/amd/display: move FPU related code from dcn315 to dml/dcn31 folder")
Fixes: 3f8951cc12 ("drm/amd/display: move FPU related code from dcn316 to dml/dcn31 folder")
Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The -mno-gnu-attribute option in dcn301 clk mgr makefile hides a soft vs
hard fp error for powerpc. After removing this flag, we can see some FPU
code remains there:
gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/powerpc64-linux/bin/powerpc64-linux-ld:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/display_mode_lib.o uses
hard float,
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn301/vg_clk_mgr.o
uses soft float
Therefore, remove the -mno-gnu-attribute flag for dcn301/powerpc and
move FPU-associated code to DML folder.
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
There is a theoretical problem in prior patches for reducing the stack
size of *update_bw_bounding_box() functions.
By modifying the soc.clock_limits[n] struct directly, this can cause
unintended behavior as the for loop attempts to swap rows in
clock_limits[n]. A temporary struct is still required to make sure we
stay functinoally equivalent.
[How]
Add a temporary clock_limits table to the SOC struct, and use it when
swapping rows.
Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GCC throw warnings for the function dcn301_fpu_update_bw_bounding_box
due to its frame size that looks like this:
error: the frame size of 1936 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
For fixing this issue I dropped an intermadiate variable.
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Mirrors the logic for dcn30. Cue lots of WARNs and some
kernel panics without this fix.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
As part of the FPU isolation work documented in
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93042/, isolate
code that uses FPU in DCN301 to DML, where all FPU code
should locate.
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Zhan Liu <Zhan.Liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
