If set, force the allocation to be placed in the mappable portion of
I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE. One big restriction here is that system memory
(i.e I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM) must be given as a potential placement for the
object, that way we can always spill the object into system memory if we
can't make space.
Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-sanity-check
Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-big
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220629174350.384910-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
On small BAR configurations, when dealing with I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE
allocations, we assume that by default, all userspace allocations should
be placed in the non-CPU visible portion. Note that dumb buffers are
not included here, since these are not "GPU accelerated" and likely need
CPU access. We choose to just always set GPU_ONLY, and let the backend
figure out if that should be ignored or not, for example on full BAR
systems.
In a later patch userspace will be able to provide a hint if CPU access
to the buffer is needed.
v2(Thomas)
- Apply GPU_ONLY on all discrete devices, but only if the BO can be
placed in LMEM. Down in the depths this should be turned into a noop,
where required, and as an annotation it still make some sense. If we
apply it regardless of the placements then we end up needing to check
the placements during exec capture. Also it's slightly inconsistent
since the NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS can only be applied on objects that can be
placed in LMEM. The other annoyance would be gem_create_ext vs plain
gem_create, if we were to always apply GPU_ONLY.
Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-sanity-check
Testcase: igt@gem-create@create-ext-cpu-access-big
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220629174350.384910-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
Add a generic interface for allocating an object at some specific
offset, and convert stolen over. Later we will want to hook this up to
different backends.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220315181425.576828-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
Include drm_fourcc.h, drm_plane.h, and drm_color_mgmt.h where needed, so
we can drop the includes for drm_atomic.h and drm_fourcc.h from
i915_drv.h, reducing the build dependencies.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b03711b2286396b2e9d5822f6adef4e7a6dc0f7b.1644507885.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Use to_gt() helper consistently throughout the codebase.
Pure mechanical s/i915->gt/to_gt(i915). No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211214193346.21231-6-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
This api allow user mode to create protected buffers and to mark
contexts as making use of such objects. Only when using contexts
marked in such a way is the execution guaranteed to work as expected.
Contexts can only be marked as using protected content at creation time
(i.e. the parameter is immutable) and they must be both bannable and not
recoverable. Given that the protected session gets invalidated on
suspend, contexts created this way hold a runtime pm wakeref until
they're either destroyed or invalidated.
All protected objects and contexts will be considered invalid when the
PXP session is destroyed and all new submissions using them will be
rejected. All intel contexts within the invalidated gem contexts will be
marked banned. Userspace can detect that an invalidation has occurred via
the RESET_STATS ioctl, where we report it the same way as a ban due to a
hang.
v5: squash patches, rebase on proto_ctx, update kerneldoc
v6: rebase on obj create_ext changes
v7: Use session counter to check if an object it valid, hold wakeref in
context, don't add a new flag to RESET_STATS (Daniel)
v8: don't increase guilty count for contexts banned during pxp
invalidation (Rodrigo)
v9: better comments, avoid wakeref put race between pxp_inval and
context_close, add usage examples (Rodrigo)
v10: modify internal set/get-protected-context functions to not
return -ENODEV when setting PXP param to false or getting param
when running on pxp-unsupported hw or getting param when i915
was built with CONFIG_PXP off
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210924191452.1539378-11-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
DG1 has support for local memory, which requires the usage of the
lmem placement extension for creating bo's, and memregion queries
to obtain the size. Because of this, those parts of the uapi are
no longer guarded behind FAKE_LMEM.
According to the pull request referenced below, mesa should be mostly
ready for DG1. VK_EXT_memory_budget is not hooked up yet, but we
should definitely just enable the uapi parts by default.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/11584
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210812124452.622233-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Instead of hand-rolling the same three calls in each function, pull them
into an i915_gem_object_create_user helper. Apart from re-ordering of
the placements array ENOMEM check, there should be no functional change.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Add the call to i915_gem_flush_free_objects() from
i915_gem_dumb_create() in a separate patch
- Move i915_gem_object_alloc() below the simple error checks
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Add __ to i915_gem_object_create_user and kerneldoc which warns the
caller that it's not validating anything.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-5-jason@jlekstrand.net
This doesn't really fix anything serious since the chances of a client
creating and destroying a mass of dumb BOs is pretty low. However, it
is called by the other two create IOCTLs to garbage collect old objects.
Call it here too for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-4-jason@jlekstrand.net
Since we don't allow changing the set of regions after creation, we can
make ext_set_placements() build up the region set directly in the
create_ext and assign it to the object later. This is similar to what
we did for contexts with the proto-context only simpler because there's
no funny object shuffling. This will be used in the next patch to allow
us to de-duplicate a bunch of code. Also, since we know the maximum
number of regions up-front, we can use a fixed-size temporary array for
the regions. This simplifies memory management a bit for this new
delayed approach.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Get rid of MAX_N_PLACEMENTS
- Drop kfree(placements) from set_placements()
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Properly set ext_data->n_placements
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-3-jason@jlekstrand.net
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Treat it the same as the fake local-memory stuff, where it is disabled
for normal kernels, in case some random UMD is tempted to use this. Once
we have all the other bits and pieces in place, like the TTM conversion,
we can turn this on for real.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-9-matthew.auld@intel.com
All userspace objects must be cleared when allocating the backing store,
before they are potentially visible to userspace. For now use simple
CPU based clearing to do this for device local-memory objects, note that
in the near future this will instead use the blitter engine.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-8-matthew.auld@intel.com
Add new extension to support setting an immutable-priority-list of
potential placements, at creation time.
If we use the normal gem_create or gem_create_ext without the
extensions/placements then we still get the old behaviour with only
placing the object in system memory.
v2(Daniel & Jason):
- Add a bunch of kernel-doc
- Simplify design for placements extension
Testcase: igt/gem_create/create-ext-placement-sanity-check
Testcase: igt/gem_create/create-ext-placement-each
Testcase: igt/gem_create/create-ext-placement-all
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
Same old gem_create but with now with extensions support. This is needed
to support various upcoming usecases.
v2:(Chris)
- Use separate ioctl number for gem_create_ext, instead of hijacking
the existing gem_create ioctl, otherwise we run into the issue
with being unable to detect if the kernel supports the new extension
behaviour.
- We now have gem_create_ext.flags, which should be zeroed.
- I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_SETPARAM value is now zero, since this is the
index into our array of extensions.
- Setup a "vanilla" object which we can directly apply our extensions
to.
v3:(Daniel & Jason)
- drop I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_SETPARAM. Instead just have each extension
do one thing only, instead of generic setparam which can cover
various use cases.
- add some kernel-doc.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-5-matthew.auld@intel.com
With the upcoming gem_create_ext we want to be able create a "vanilla"
object upfront and pass that directly to the extensions, before actually
initialising the object. Functionally this should be the same expect we
now feed the object into the lower-level region specific init_object.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210429103056.407067-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
Depending on the regions min_page_size we might need to adjust the
object size, ensure this matches our expectations.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
In preparation for gem_create_ext break out the gem_create uAPI, so that
we don't clutter i915_gem.c once we start adding various extensions
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
