Currently, some CAN drivers support hardware timestamping, some do
not. But userland has no method to query which features are supported
(aside maybe of getting RX messages and observe whether or not
hardware timestamps stay at zero).
The canonical way for a network driver to advertised what kind of
timestamping it supports is to implement ethtool_ops::get_ts_info().
This patch only targets the CAN drivers which *do not* support
hardware timestamping. For each of those CAN drivers, implement the
get_ts_info() using the generic ethtool_op_get_ts_info().
This way, userland can do:
| $ ethtool --show-time-stamping canX
to confirm the device timestamping capacities.
N.B. the drivers which support hardware timestamping will be migrated
in separate patches.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220727101641.198847-6-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
[mkl: mscan: add missing mscan_ethtool_ops]
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
The function c_can_set_ethtool_ops() does one thing: populate
net_device::ethtool_ops. Instead, it is possible to directly assign
this field and remove one function call and slightly reduce the object
size. To do so, export c_can_ethtool_ops so it becomes visible to
c_can_main.c.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220727104939.279022-3-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
The ethtool core implements a default drvinfo.
There's no need to replicate this in the driver, no additional
information is added, so remove this and rely on the default.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220124215642.3474154-10-mkl@pengutronix.de
Cc: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Add two new parameters kernel_ringparam and extack for
.get_ringparam and .set_ringparam to extend more ring params
through netlink.
Signed-off-by: Hao Chen <chenhao288@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The pdev maybe not a platform device, e.g. c_can_pci device, in this
case, calling to_platform_device() would not make sense. Also, per the
comment in drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_ethtool.c, @bus_info should
match dev_name() string, so I am replacing this with dev_name() to fix
this issue.
[ 1.458583] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000100000000
[ 1.460921] RIP: 0010:strnlen+0x1a/0x30
[ 1.466336] ? c_can_get_drvinfo+0x65/0xb0 [c_can]
[ 1.466597] ethtool_get_drvinfo+0xae/0x360
[ 1.466826] dev_ethtool+0x10f8/0x2970
[ 1.467880] sock_ioctl+0xef/0x300
Fixes: 2722ac986e ("can: c_can: add ethtool support")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210906233704.1162666-1-ztong0001@gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
With commit 132f2d45fb ("can: c_can: add support to 64 message
objects") the number of message objects used for reception /
transmission depends on FIFO size.
The ethtools API support allows you to retrieve this info. Driver info
has been added too.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210514165549.14365-2-dariobin@libero.it
Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
