Implement low refresh rate (LRR) where we change the vblank
length by hand as requested, but otherwise keep the timing
generator running in non-VRR mode (ie. fixed refresh rate).
The panel itself must support VRR for this to work, and
only TGL+ has the double buffred TRANS_VTOTAL.VTOTAL that
we need to make the switch properly. The double buffer
latching happens at the start of transcoders undelayed
vblank. The other thing that we change is
TRANS_VBLANK.VBLANK_END but the hardware entirely ignores
that in DP mode. But I decided to keep writing it anyway
just to avoid more special cases in readout/state check.
v2: Document that TRANS_VBLANK.VBLANK_END is ignored by
the hardware
v3: Reconcile with VRR fastset
Adjust update_lrr flag behaviour
Make sure timings stay within VRR range
v4: Fix up update_m_n vs. update_lrr rebase fail (Manasi)
Drop DOUBLE_BUFFER_VACTIVE define as it's not needed (Manasi)
TODO: Hook LRR into the automatic DRRS downclocking stuff?
Cc: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230915103800.14218-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <navaremanasi@chromium.org>
Stepping-specific display behavior shouldn't be tied to MTL as a
platform, but rather specifically to the Xe_LPD+ IP. Future non-MTL
platforms may re-use this IP and will need to follow the exact same
logic and apply the same workarounds. IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP() is dropped
in favor of a new macro IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP() that only checks the
display IP version.
v2:
- Rename macro to IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP for consistency with the
corresponding GT macro and handle steppings the same way.
v3:
- Drop the automatic "STEP_" pasting.
v4:
- Implement IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP on top of IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE /
IS_DISPLAY_STEP building blocks and make the parameters from/until
instead of begin/fixed. (Jani)
- Fix usage details in comment.
v5:
- Tweak macro comment. (Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230821180619.650007-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We don't really need a feature flag for has_4tile since there's a
well-defined cutover point (DG2) at which all new platforms started
using Tile4 as their Y-major tiling layout. The GT side of the code
already handles Tile4 vs legacy TileY with checks on the IP version
rather than looking at the feature flag, and we can simplify the display
code similarly (which will also make it more self-contained for re-use
in the Xe driver).
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Haridhar Kalvala <haridhar.kalvala@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230810234618.3738870-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Add new function intel_display_device_info_print() and print the display
device info there instead of intel_device_info_print(). This also fixes
the display runtime info printing to use the actual runtime info instead
of the static defaults.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/30d4f93c58839bc9312b43423cd43bc0ef655a35.1687878757.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Declare the available DVO/SDVO/HDMI/DP/DDI ports in the
device info. The other outputs (LVDS/TV/DSI/VGA) are left
out since for most of them we don't consider them as "ports".
DSI we should probably perhaps include somehow in the device
info. Just not sure how. Or we just introduce a HAS_DSI() and
call it a day?
TODO: figure out what to do about the subplatform stuff. Would
it be better to declare those directly with a different
device info or not? Also not sure the icl port-f stuff
matters even. Bspec claims there are icl SKUs with far
less ports than that and we don't seem to check for those
either?
v2: Fix TC5 vs. TC6 mixup on TGL (Jani)
Drop DDI C for now on TGL, and add a FIXME (Jani)
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230616140820.11726-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Drop the unnecessary directory prefix. This also makes
intel_display_device.h easier to use from the Xe driver.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230607150946.1996087-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Moving display-specific runtime info initialization into display/ makes
the display code more self-contained and also makes it easier to call
from the Xe driver.
v2:
- Drop unnecessary display/ prefix from #includes. (Jani)
- Clear runtime info if fusing leaves no pipes remaining, the same as
we do when fusing indicates the entire display controller is
unavailable. (Jani)
- Move adjustment of DRIVER_MODESET / DRIVER_ATOMIC after call to
intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(); HAS_DISPLAY may have
changed to false during the runtime init. (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230602181450.1151368-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
For platforms with GMD_ID support (i.e., everything MTL and beyond),
identification of the display IP present should be based on the contents
of the GMD_ID register rather than a PCI devid match.
Note that since GMD_ID readout requires access to the PCI BAR, a slight
change to the driver init sequence is needed --- pci_enable_device() is
now called before i915_driver_create().
v2:
- Fix use of uninitialized i915 pointer in error path if
pci_enable_device() fails before the i915 device is created. (lkp)
- Use drm_device parameter to intel_display_device_probe. This goes
against i915 conventions, but since the primary goal here is to make
it easy to call this function from other drivers (like Xe) and since
we don't need anything from the i915 structure, this seems like an
exception where drm_device is a more natural fit.
v3:
- Go back do drm_i915_private for intel_display_device_probe. (Jani)
- Move forward decl to top of header. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Rather than selecting the display IP and feature flags at the same time
the general PCI probing happens, move this step into the display code
itself so that it can be more easily re-used outside of i915 (i.e., by
the Xe driver).
v2:
- Make intel_display_device_probe() always return a non-NULL pointer
and simplify copying of runtime_defaults. (Andrzej)
v3:
- Redefine INTEL_VGA_DEVICE/INTEL_QUANTA_DEVICE to eliminate a cast and
an include of linux/mod_devicetable.h. (Jani)
- Keep explicit memcpy for runtime defaults. (Jani)
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Move the runtime info specific to display into display-specific
structures as has already been done with the constant display info.
v2:
- Rename __runtime to __runtime_defaults for more clarity on the
purpose. (Andrzej)
- Move introduction of DISPLAY_INFO() to previous patch. (Andrzej)
- Drop NO_DISPLAY macro. (Andrzej)
v3:
- Use "{}" instead of "{ 0 }" for empty struct init. (Jani)
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Moving display-specific substructure definitions will help keep display
more self-contained and make it easier to re-use in other drivers (i.e.,
Xe) in the future.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
