[Why]
We dont's turn off backlight before power off eDP (VDD),
which is a violation of eDP specs.
[How]
Power off eDP backlight before power off eDP
Signed-off-by: Peikang Zhang <peikang.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
When changing pixel formats for HDR (e.g. ARGB -> FP16)
there are configurations that change from 2 pipes to 1 pipe.
In these cases, it seems that disconnecting MPCC and doing
a surface update at the same time(after unlocking) causes
some registers to be updated slightly faster than others
after unlocking (e.g. if the pixel format is updated to FP16
before the new surface address is programmed, we get
corruption on the screen because the pixel formats aren't
matching). We separate disconnecting MPCC from the rest
of the pipe programming sequence to prevent this.
[How]
Move MPCC disconnect into separate operation than the
rest of the pipe programming.
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
When changing pixel formats for HDR (e.g. ARGB -> FP16)
there are configurations that change from 2 pipes to 1 pipe.
In these cases, it seems that disconnecting MPCC and doing
a surface update at the same time(after unlocking) causes
some registers to be updated slightly faster than others
after unlocking (e.g. if the pixel format is updated to FP16
before the new surface address is programmed, we get
corruption on the screen because the pixel formats aren't
matching). We separate disconnecting MPCC from the rest
of the pipe programming sequence to prevent this.
[How]
Move MPCC disconnect into separate operation than the
rest of the pipe programming.
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use DCN21 functions instead of DCE110
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
why:
seamless boots requires split of init_hw into hw and pipes to work. This
was implemented in dcn10_init_hw but did not apply yet to dcn30.
how:
Copy over dcn10_init_hw and adapt it to dcn30 using recent changes to
dcn3. Behavior will be different in init sequence.
Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <martin.leung@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There're 2 .dsc_pg_control, drop the first one.
.dsc_pg_control = NULL,
.dsc_pg_control = dcn20_dsc_pg_control,
Signed-off-by: Flora Cui <flora.cui@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Initilize function tables for hw programing
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
