As metadata_ratio mount option is unsinged so manage it as %u for token
verifications, instead of %d.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The mount option thread_pool is always unsigned. Manage it that way all
around.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
extent_buffer_uptodate() is a trivial wrapper around test_bit() and
nothing else. So make it static and inline, save on code space and call
indirection.
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
1131257 82898 18992 1233147 12d0fb fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
1131090 82898 18992 1232980 12d054 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass btrfs_trans_handle which contains a reference to the
fs_info so use that. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass the btrfs_transaction which references fs_info so no
need to pass the later as an argument. Also use the opportunity to
shorten transaction->trans. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass the trans handle which has a reference to fs_info to
create_pending_snapshot so we can refer to it directly. Doing this
obviates the need to pass the fs_info to create_pending_snapshots as
well. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already have the fs_info from the passed transaction so use it
directly. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The only thing the passed root is used for is:
1. get a reference to the fs_info and to
2. call trace_btrfs_transaction_commit.
We can achieve 1) by simply referring to the fs_info from passed trans
object. As far as 2) is concerned cleanup_transaction is called from
only one place and the 'root' argument passed is the one from the trans
handle. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass a transaction handle which refrences the fs_info so
we can grab it from there. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass the transaction handle which has a reference to the
fs_info. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass the transaction which has a reference to the fs_info,
so use that. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already pass the transaction handle, which contains a refrence to
the fs_info so grab it from there. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaction so no point in passing
it as a function argument. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It can be referenced from the passed transaciton so no point in
passing it as function argument. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All current callers of this function just get a reference to the
trans->fs_info member and pass it as the second argument. Collapse this
into the function itself. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction is essentially a wrapper of
btrfs_write_and_wait_marked_extents with the addition of calling
clear_btree_io_tree. Having the code split doesn't really bring any
benefit. Open code the later into the former and add proper
documentation header.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ reformat comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is only ever used in __btrfs_end_transaction and
btrfs_commit_transaction so there is no need to export it via header.
Let's move it closer to where it's used, make it static and remove it
from the header. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev_for_resume() initializes replace
target device in a few simple steps, so do it at the parent function.
Moreover, there isn't any other caller so just open code it.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Current u64 return from btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() was probably done
to match the btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace_args::result. However as our
actual return value fits in int, and it further gets typecast to u64,
so just return int.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove __ which is for the special functions.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() calls __btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() for the
actual cancel so just open code it.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently the function uses a hardcoded value for the checksum size of
a sector. This is fine, given that we currently support only a single
algorithm, whose checksum is 4 bytes == sizeof(u32). Despite not
having other algorithms, btrfs' design supports using a different
algorithm whith different space requirements. To future-proof the code
query the size of the currently used algorithm from the in-memory copy
of the super block. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add a missing void parameter to function btrfs_test_extent_map, fixes
sparse warning:
warning: non-ANSI function declaration of function 'btrfs_test_extent_map'
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The check for a non-zero ret is redundant as the goto will jump to
the very next statement anyway. Remove this extraneous code.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1463784 ("Identical code for different
branches")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Commit 0e8c36a9fd ("Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space
is not enough") changed the way transaction reservation is made in
btrfs_evict_node and as a result this function became unused. This has
been the status quo for 5 years in which time no one noticed, so I'd
say it's safe to assume it's unlikely it will ever be used again.
Historical note: there were more attempts to remove the function, the
reasoning was missing and only based on some static analysis tool
reports. Other reason for rejection was that there seemed to be
connection to BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT and that would need to be
removeed to. This was not correct so removing the function is all we can
do.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
[ add the note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Presently, failing a primary super block write but succeeding in at
least one super block write in general will appear to users as if
nothing important went wrong. However, upon unmounting and re-mounting,
the file system will be in a rolled back state. This was discovered
with a BCC program that uses bpf_override_return() to fail super block
writes.
This patch outputs an error clarifying that the primary super block
write has failed, so users can expect potentially erroneous behaviour.
It also forces wait_dev_supers() to return an error to its caller if
the primary super block write fails.
Signed-off-by: Howard McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This prints out eb->bflags since it contains some useful information,
e.g. whether eb is dirty.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old wait_on_atomic_t() is going to get removed, use the more
flexible wait_var_event() API instead.
No change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bXFe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-4.16-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"There's an important revert in this pull request that needs to go to
stable as it causes a corruption on big endian machines.
The other fix is for FIEMAP incorrectly reporting shared extents
before a sync and one fix for a crash in raid56.
So far we got only one report about the BE corruption, the stable
kernels were out for like a week, so hopefully the scope of the damage
is low"
* tag 'for-4.16-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Revert "btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy"
btrfs: add missing initialization in btrfs_check_shared
btrfs: Fix NULL pointer exception in find_bio_stripe
This reverts commit 3c181c12c4.
The offending patch was merged in 4.16-rc4 and was promptly applied to
stable kernels 4.14.25 and 4.15.8.
The patch causes a corruption in several superblock items on big-endian
machines because of messed up endianity conversions. The damage is
manually repairable. A filesystem cannot be mounted again after it has
been unmounted once.
We do a full revert and not a fixup so stable can pick that patch ASAP.
Fixes: 3c181c12c4 ("btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1521139304@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reported-by: Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely
report a shared extent. The test case is as follows:
xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
sync
xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5
which gives the resulting output:
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x2001
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes
repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report
the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not
re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls
from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This
is a regressive behavior from 4.13.
With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows:
wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec)
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
/media/scratch/file5:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1
which corrects the regression.
Fixes: 3ec4d3238a ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents")
Signed-off-by: Edmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com>
[ add text from cover letter to changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bF96
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-4.16-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
- when NR_CPUS is large, a SRCU structure can significantly inflate
size of the main filesystem structure that would not be possible to
allocate by kmalloc, so the kvalloc fallback is used
- improved error handling
- fix endiannes when printing some filesystem attributes via sysfs,
this is could happen when a filesystem is moved between different
endianity hosts
- send fixes: the NO_HOLE mode should not send a write operation for a
file hole
- fix log replay for for special files followed by file hardlinks
- fix log replay failure after unlink and link combination
- fix max chunk size calculation for DUP allocation
* tag 'for-4.16-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
Btrfs: fix log replay failure after unlink and link combination
Btrfs: fix log replay failure after linking special file and fsync
Btrfs: send, fix issuing write op when processing hole in no data mode
btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy
btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling
btrfs: Handle btrfs_set_extent_delalloc failure in relocate_file_extent_cluster
btrfs: handle failure of add_pending_csums
btrfs: use kvzalloc to allocate btrfs_fs_info
If we have a file with 2 (or more) hard links in the same directory,
remove one of the hard links, create a new file (or link an existing file)
in the same directory with the name of the removed hard link, and then
finally fsync the new file, we end up with a log that fails to replay,
causing a mount failure.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/testdir
$ touch /mnt/testdir/foo
$ ln /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar
$ sync
$ unlink /mnt/testdir/bar
$ touch /mnt/testdir/bar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/bar
<power failure>
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
mount: mount(2) failed: /mnt: No such file or directory
When replaying the log, for that example, we also see the following in
dmesg/syslog:
[71813.671307] BTRFS info (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to bar, inode 258 parent 257
[71813.674204] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[71813.675694] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[71813.677236] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13231 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4128 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] Modules linked in: btrfs xfs f2fs dm_flakey dm_mod dax ghash_clmulni_intel ppdev pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse i2c_piix4 parport_pc i2c_core pcspkr sg serio_raw parport button sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod ata_generic sd_mod virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel floppy virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[71813.679669] CPU: 1 PID: 13231 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-56+ #1
[71813.679669] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[71813.679669] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001cef738 EFLAGS: 00010286
[71813.679669] RAX: 0000000000000025 RBX: ffff880217ce4708 RCX: 0000000000000001
[71813.679669] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c14bae RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[71813.679669] RBP: ffffc90001cef7c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
[71813.679669] R10: ffffc90001cef5e0 R11: ffffffff8343f007 R12: ffff880217d474c8
[71813.679669] R13: 00000000fffffffe R14: ffff88021ccf1548 R15: 0000000000000101
[71813.679669] FS: 00007f7cee84c480(0000) GS:ffff88023fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[71813.679669] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[71813.679669] CR2: 00007f7cedc1abf9 CR3: 00000002354b4003 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[71813.679669] Call Trace:
[71813.679669] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17/0x41 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] drop_one_dir_item+0xfa/0x131 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] add_inode_ref+0x71e/0x851 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71
[71813.679669] ? replay_one_buffer+0x53/0x53a [btrfs]
[71813.679669] replay_one_buffer+0x4a4/0x53a [btrfs]
[71813.679669] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3a/0x57
[71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71
[71813.679669] walk_up_log_tree+0x101/0x1d2 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] walk_log_tree+0xad/0x188 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1fa/0x31e [btrfs]
[71813.679669] ? replay_one_extent+0x544/0x544 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] open_ctree+0x1cf6/0x2209 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] btrfs_mount_root+0x368/0x482 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
[71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2
[71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
[71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
[71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce
[71813.679669] btrfs_mount+0x13e/0x772 [btrfs]
[71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6
[71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2
[71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
[71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b
[71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce
[71813.679669] do_mount+0x6e5/0x973
[71813.679669] ? memdup_user+0x3e/0x5c
[71813.679669] SyS_mount+0x72/0x98
[71813.679669] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b
[71813.679669] RIP: 0033:0x7f7cedf150ba
[71813.679669] RSP: 002b:00007ffca71da688 EFLAGS: 00000206
[71813.679669] Code: 7f a0 e8 51 0c fd ff 48 8b 43 50 f0 0f ba a8 30 2c 00 00 02 72 17 41 83 fd fb 74 11 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 7d 11 7f a0 e8 38 f5 8d e0 <0f> ff 44 89 e9 ba 20 10 00 00 eb 4d 48 8b 4d b0 48 8b 75 88 4c
[71813.679669] ---[ end trace 83bd473fc5b4663b ]---
[71813.854764] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:4128: errno=-2 No such entry
[71813.886994] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_replay_log:2307: errno=-2 No such entry (Failed to recover log tree)
[71813.903357] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30
[71814.128078] BTRFS error (device dm-0): open_ctree failed
This happens because the log has inode reference items for both inode 258
(the first file we created) and inode 259 (the second file created), and
when processing the reference item for inode 258, we replace the
corresponding item in the subvolume tree (which has two names, "foo" and
"bar") witht he one in the log (which only has one name, "foo") without
removing the corresponding dir index keys from the parent directory.
Later, when processing the inode reference item for inode 259, which has
a name of "bar" associated to it, we notice that dir index entries exist
for that name and for a different inode, so we attempt to unlink that
name, which fails because the inode reference item for inode 258 no longer
has the name "bar" associated to it, making a call to btrfs_unlink_inode()
fail with a -ENOENT error.
Fix this by unlinking all the names in an inode reference item from a
subvolume tree that are not present in the inode reference item found in
the log tree, before overwriting it with the item from the log tree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
If in the same transaction we rename a special file (fifo, character/block
device or symbolic link), create a hard link for it having its old name
then sync the log, we will end up with a log that can not be replayed and
at when attempting to replay it, an EEXIST error is returned and mounting
the filesystem fails. Example scenario:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/testdir
$ mkfifo /mnt/testdir/foo
# Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted.
$ sync
# Create some unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to create a log
# tree. The file must be in the same directory as our special file.
$ touch /mnt/testdir/f1
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/f1
# Rename our special file and then create a hard link with its old name.
$ mv /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar
$ ln /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/foo
# Create some other unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to persist
# the log tree which was modified by the previous rename and link
# operations. Alternatively we could have modified file f1 and fsync it.
$ touch /mnt/f2
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/f2
<power failure>
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
mount: mount /dev/sdc on /mnt failed: File exists
This happens because when both the log tree and the subvolume's tree have
an entry in the directory "testdir" with the same name, that is, there
is one key (258 INODE_REF 257) in the subvolume tree and another one in
the log tree (where 258 is the inode number of our special file and 257
is the inode for directory "testdir"). Only the data of those two keys
differs, in the subvolume tree the index field for inode reference has
a value of 3 while the log tree it has a value of 5. Because the same key
exists in both trees, but have different index, the log replay fails with
an -EEXIST error when attempting to replay the inode reference from the
log tree.
Fix this by setting the last_unlink_trans field of the inode (our special
file) to the current transaction id when a hard link is created, as this
forces logging the parent directory inode, solving the conflict at log
replay time.
A new generic test case for fstests was also submitted.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature
enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode
send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by
issuing the update extent operation instead.
Trivial reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd
$ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \
| btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd
Before this change the output of the second receive command is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447...
utimes
write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192
utimes foobar
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-...
After this change it is:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
utimes
update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192
utimes foobar
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64...
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fs_info::super_copy is a byte copy of the on-disk structure and all
members must use the accessor macros/functions to obtain the right
value. This was missing in update_super_roots and in sysfs readers.
Moving between opposite endianness hosts will report bogus numbers in
sysfs, and mount may fail as the root will not be restored correctly. If
the filesystem is always used on a same endian host, this will not be a
problem.
Fix this by using the btrfs_set_super...() functions to set
fs_info::super_copy values, and for the sysfs, use the cached
fs_info::nodesize/sectorsize values.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: df93589a17 ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a
device to hold two stripes.
The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated
space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually
twice the stripe size.
Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by
dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to
see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this
check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce
the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used
stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size.
The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will
actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size.
Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size
check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct
tape division in further on to get it fixed again.
Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only
affects DUP.
Other attempts in the past were made to fix this:
* 37db63a400 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried
to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting
on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value.
* 86db25785a "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally
broke this fix again.
The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in
73c5de0051.
The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP
will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits
in the code again like it was 5 years ago.
Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html
Fixes: 73c5de0051 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation")
Fixes: 86db25785a ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6")
Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Essentially duplicate the error handling from the above block which
handles the !PageUptodate(page) case and additionally clear
EXTENT_BOUNDARY.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
add_pending_csums was added as part of the new data=ordered
implementation in e6dcd2dc9c ("Btrfs: New data=ordered
implementation"). Even back then it called the btrfs_csum_file_blocks
which can fail but it never bothered handling the failure. In ENOMEM
situation this could lead to the filesystem failing to write the
checksums for a particular extent and not detect this. On read this
could lead to the filesystem erroring out due to crc mismatch. Fix it by
propagating failure from add_pending_csums and handling them.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The srcu_struct in btrfs_fs_info scales in size with NR_CPUS. On
kernels built with NR_CPUS=8192, this can result in kmalloc failures
that prevent mounting.
There is work in progress to try to resolve this for every user of
srcu_struct but using kvzalloc will work around the failures until
that is complete.
As an example with NR_CPUS=512 on x86_64: the overall size of
subvol_srcu is 3460 bytes, fs_info is 6496.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=VeA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-4.16-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux
Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
"We have a few assorted fixes, some of them show up during fstests so I
gave them more testing"
* tag 'for-4.16-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
btrfs: Fix use-after-free when cleaning up fs_devs with a single stale device
Btrfs: fix null pointer dereference when replacing missing device
btrfs: remove spurious WARN_ON(ref->count < 0) in find_parent_nodes
btrfs: Ignore errors from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post
Btrfs: fix unexpected -EEXIST when creating new inode
Btrfs: fix use-after-free on root->orphan_block_rsv
Btrfs: fix btrfs_evict_inode to handle abnormal inodes correctly
Btrfs: fix extent state leak from tree log
Btrfs: fix crash due to not cleaning up tree log block's dirty bits
Btrfs: fix deadlock in run_delalloc_nocow
Commit 4fde46f0cc ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced
btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all
registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't
mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it
and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also free
the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a use after
free since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the
already freed memory to see if it has to terminate the loop.
The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current
fs_devs.
Fixes: 4fde46f0cc ("Btrfs: free the stale device")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
Modules linked in: [...]
CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G D W L 4.11.9-zb64+ #1
Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101 12/02/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
__warn+0xd1/0xf0
warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
__btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
? __fget+0x112/0x200
SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140
Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f99442 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.
Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
<enadolski@suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list.
Fixes: 8da6d5815c ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Running generic/019 with qgroups on the scratch device enabled is almost
guaranteed to trigger the BUG_ON in btrfs_free_tree_block. It's supposed
to trigger only on -ENOMEM, in reality, however, it's possible to get
-EIO from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post. This function just finds the
roots of the extent being tracked and sets the qrecord->old_roots list.
If this operation fails nothing critical happens except the quota
accounting can be considered wrong. In such case just set the
INCONSISTENT flag for the quota and print a warning, rather than killing
off the system. Additionally, it's possible to trigger a BUG_ON in
btrfs_truncate_inode_items as well.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ error message adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The highest objectid, which is assigned to new inode, is decided at
the time of initializing fs roots. However, in cases where log replay
gets processed, the btree which fs root owns might be changed, so we
have to search it again for the highest objectid, otherwise creating
new inode would end up with -EEXIST.
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v4.4-rc6+
Fixes: f32e48e925 ("Btrfs: Initialize btrfs_root->highest_objectid when loading tree root and subvolume roots")
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This regression is introduced in
commit 3d48d9810d ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction").
There are two problems,
a) it is ->destroy_inode() that does the final free on inode, not
->evict_inode(),
b) clear_inode() must be called before ->evict_inode() returns.
This could end up hitting BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR));
in evict() because I_CLEAR is set in clear_inode().
Fixes: commit 3d48d9810d ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.7-rc6+
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
