The VLV/CHV sideband code is pretty distinct from the rest of the
sideband code. Split it out to new vlv_sideband.[ch].
Pure code movement with relevant #include changes, and a tiny checkpatch
fix on top.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/755ebbbaf01fc6d306b763b6ef60f45e671ba290.1634119597.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Move assert_panel_unlocked() to intel_pps.c and rename
assert_pps_unlocked(). Keep the functionality and the assert code
together.
There's still a bit of a split between the eDP PPS usage in intel_pps.c
and all the other PPS usage, and assert_pps_unlocked() is arguably more
related to the latter. However, intel_pps.c is the best fit for anything
touching the PPS registers.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a9b77692a145891789eefb0447e082cfc22aaa85.1632992608.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
PIPECONF becamse TRANSCONF when HSW introduced the EDP transcoder.
Bigjoiner is making life even more confusing by introducing
a N:1 relationship between pipes and transcoders. In that case
we only enable/configure the transcoder corresponding to the
master pipe. Let's do some renames to make it clear we're dealing
with the transcoder rather than pipe when it comes to
PIPECONF/TRANSCONF.
I decided to leave the _cpu_ part out from the function/macro
names since the PCH transcoder related stuff already has a
_pch_ in their name. So shouldn't be possible to confuse them.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210913144440.23008-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
On g4x and pch the DPLL has two P1 dividers (for refresh rate
switching). Program the FPx1 P1 divider consistently to the reduced
clock P1 divider if available, otherwise just program it to the
same value as the FPx0 P1 divider.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210715093530.31711-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
When we enable the DPLL for the PPS kick, let's tell the DPLL code
we're dealing with an eDP output. This shouldn't really matter, but
it's more consistent with the way the DPLL is configured when we're
actually enabling the eDP port for real.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210715093530.31711-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
DG2's SNPS PHYs incorporate a dedicated port PLL called MPLLB which
takes the place of the shared DPLLs we've used on past platforms. Let's
add the MPLLB programming sequences; they'll be plugged into the rest of
the code in future patches.
Bspec: 54032
Bspec: 53881
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nidhi Gupta <nidhi1.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723174239.1551352-24-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too. We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.
v2:
- Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 70bfb30743)
[Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
This pulls a large chunk of the pll calculation code out of
intel_display.c to a new file.
One function makes sense to be an inline, otherwise this
is pretty much a straight copy cover. Also all the
remaining hooks for g45 and older end up the same now.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[Jani: cleaned up intel_dpll.h a bit, de-duped intel_panel_use_ssc().]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/74b58e0572858b5d1734818ca594a23040d7d44f.1610622609.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
