1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2025-03-06 20:59:54 +01:00
Commit graph

6044 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Omar Sandoval
3e1e8bb770 Btrfs: add extent buffer bitmap operations
These are going to be used for the free space tree bitmap items.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-12-17 12:16:46 -08:00
Filipe Manana
f28a492878 Btrfs: fix leaking of ordered extents after direct IO write error
When doing a direct IO write, __blockdev_direct_IO() can call the
btrfs_get_blocks_direct() callback one or more times before it calls the
btrfs_submit_direct() callback. However it can fail after calling the
first callback and before calling the second callback, which is a problem
because the first one creates ordered extents and the second one is the
one that submits bios that cover the ordered extents created by the first
one. That means the ordered extents will never complete nor have any of
the flags BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE / BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR set, resulting in
subsequent operations (such as other direct IO writes, buffered writes or
hole punching) that lock the same IO range and lookup for ordered extents
in the range to hang forever waiting for those ordered extents because
they can not complete ever, since no bio was submitted.

Fix this by tracking a range of created ordered extents that don't have
yet corresponding bios submitted and completing the ordered extents in
the range if __blockdev_direct_IO() fails with an error.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-17 10:59:51 +00:00
Filipe Manana
b850ae1427 Btrfs: fix deadlock between direct IO write and defrag/readpages
If readpages() (triggered by defrag or buffered reads) is called while a
direct IO write is in progress, we have a small time window where we can
deadlock, resulting in traces like the following being generated:

[84723.212993] INFO: task fio:2849 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84723.214310]       Tainted: G        W       4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[84723.215640] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84723.217313] fio        D ffff88023ec75218     0  2849   2835 0x00000000
[84723.218778]  ffff880122dfb6e8 0000000000000092 0000000000000000 ffff88023ec75200
[84723.220458]  ffff88000e05d2c0 ffff880122dfc000 ffff88023ec75200 7fffffffffffffff
[84723.230597]  0000000000000002 ffffffff8147891a ffff880122dfb700 ffffffff8147856a
[84723.232085] Call Trace:
[84723.232625]  [<ffffffff8147891a>] ? bit_wait+0x3c/0x3c
[84723.233529]  [<ffffffff8147856a>] schedule+0x7d/0x95
[84723.234398]  [<ffffffff8147baa3>] schedule_timeout+0x43/0x10b
[84723.235384]  [<ffffffff810f82eb>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[84723.236426]  [<ffffffff8108a23d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[84723.237502]  [<ffffffff810af8a3>] ? read_seqcount_begin.constprop.20+0x57/0x6d
[84723.238807]  [<ffffffff8108a09b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
[84723.242012]  [<ffffffff8108a23d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[84723.243064]  [<ffffffff810af2ad>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xe/0x33
[84723.244116]  [<ffffffff810afa2e>] ? ktime_get+0x41/0x52
[84723.245029]  [<ffffffff81477cff>] io_schedule_timeout+0xb7/0x12b
[84723.245942]  [<ffffffff81477cff>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0xb7/0x12b
[84723.246596]  [<ffffffff81478953>] bit_wait_io+0x39/0x45
[84723.247503]  [<ffffffff81478b93>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x49/0x8d
[84723.248540]  [<ffffffff8111684f>] __lock_page+0x66/0x68
[84723.249558]  [<ffffffff81081c9b>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x3a/0x3a
[84723.250844]  [<ffffffff81124a04>] lock_page+0x2c/0x2f
[84723.251871]  [<ffffffff81124afc>] invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0xf5/0x2aa
[84723.253274]  [<ffffffff81117c34>] ? filemap_fdatawait_range+0x12d/0x146
[84723.254757]  [<ffffffff81118191>] ? filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x15
[84723.256378]  [<ffffffffa05139a2>] btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x1b0/0x664 [btrfs]
[84723.258556]  [<ffffffff8119e3f9>] ? submit_page_section+0x7b/0x111
[84723.260064]  [<ffffffff8119eb90>] do_blockdev_direct_IO+0x658/0xbdb
[84723.261479]  [<ffffffffa05137f2>] ? btrfs_page_exists_in_range+0x1a9/0x1a9 [btrfs]
[84723.262961]  [<ffffffffa050a8a6>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xce/0xce [btrfs]
[84723.264449]  [<ffffffff8119f144>] __blockdev_direct_IO+0x31/0x33
[84723.265614]  [<ffffffff8119f144>] ? __blockdev_direct_IO+0x31/0x33
[84723.266769]  [<ffffffffa050a8a6>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xce/0xce [btrfs]
[84723.268264]  [<ffffffffa050935d>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x1b9/0x259 [btrfs]
[84723.270954]  [<ffffffffa050a8a6>] ? btrfs_writepage_start_hook+0xce/0xce [btrfs]
[84723.272465]  [<ffffffff8111878c>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[84723.273734]  [<ffffffffa051955c>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x228/0x404 [btrfs]
[84723.275101]  [<ffffffff8116ca6f>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[84723.276200]  [<ffffffff8116cfab>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[84723.277298]  [<ffffffff8116d79d>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[84723.278327]  [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[84723.279595] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[84723.379035] INFO: task btrfs:2923 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84723.380323]       Tainted: G        W       4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[84723.381608] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84723.383003] btrfs           D ffff88023ed75218     0  2923   2859 0x00000000
[84723.384277]  ffff88001311f860 0000000000000082 ffff88001311f840 ffff88023ed75200
[84723.385748]  ffff88012c6751c0 ffff880013120000 ffff88012042fe68 ffff88012042fe30
[84723.387152]  ffff880221571c88 0000000000000001 ffff88001311f878 ffffffff8147856a
[84723.388620] Call Trace:
[84723.389105]  [<ffffffff8147856a>] schedule+0x7d/0x95
[84723.391882]  [<ffffffffa051da32>] btrfs_start_ordered_extent+0x161/0x1fa [btrfs]
[84723.393718]  [<ffffffff81081c61>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[84723.395659]  [<ffffffffa0522c5b>] __do_contiguous_readpages.constprop.21+0x81/0xdc [btrfs]
[84723.397383]  [<ffffffffa050ac96>] ? btrfs_submit_direct+0x3f0/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[84723.398852]  [<ffffffffa0522da3>] __extent_readpages.constprop.20+0xed/0x100 [btrfs]
[84723.400561]  [<ffffffff81123f6c>] ? __lru_cache_add+0x5d/0x72
[84723.401787]  [<ffffffffa0523896>] extent_readpages+0x111/0x1a7 [btrfs]
[84723.403121]  [<ffffffffa050ac96>] ? btrfs_submit_direct+0x3f0/0x3f0 [btrfs]
[84723.404583]  [<ffffffffa05088fa>] btrfs_readpages+0x1f/0x21 [btrfs]
[84723.406007]  [<ffffffff811226df>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x168/0x1f4
[84723.407502]  [<ffffffff81122988>] ondemand_readahead+0x21d/0x22e
[84723.408937]  [<ffffffff81122988>] ? ondemand_readahead+0x21d/0x22e
[84723.410487]  [<ffffffff81122af1>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x3d/0x3f
[84723.411710]  [<ffffffffa0535388>] btrfs_defrag_file+0x419/0xaaf [btrfs]
[84723.413007]  [<ffffffffa0531db0>] ? kzalloc+0xf/0x11 [btrfs]
[84723.414085]  [<ffffffffa0535b43>] btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x125/0x14e [btrfs]
[84723.415307]  [<ffffffffa0536753>] btrfs_ioctl+0x746/0x24c6 [btrfs]
[84723.416532]  [<ffffffff81087481>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[84723.417731]  [<ffffffff8113ad61>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7
[84723.418699]  [<ffffffff8113ad61>] ? __might_fault+0x4c/0xa7
[84723.421532]  [<ffffffff8113adba>] ? __might_fault+0xa5/0xa7
[84723.422629]  [<ffffffff81171139>] ? cp_new_stat+0x15d/0x174
[84723.423712]  [<ffffffff8117c610>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x427/0x4e6
[84723.424801]  [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[84723.425968]  [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[84723.427063]  [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[84723.428138]  [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

Consider the following logical and physical file layout:

logical:    ... [ prealloc extent A ] [ prealloc extent B ] [ extent C ] ...
                4K                    8K                    16K

physical:   ... 12853248              12857344              1103101952   ...
                                      (= 12853248 + 4K)

Extents A and B are physically adjacent. The following diagram shows a
sequence of events that lead to the deadlock when we attempt to do a
direct IO write against the file range [4K, 16K[ and a defrag is triggered
simultaneously.

           CPU 1                                               CPU 2

 btrfs_direct_IO()

   btrfs_get_blocks_direct()
     creates ordered extent A, covering
     the 4k prealloc extent A (range [4K, 8K[)

                                                    btrfs_defrag_file()
                                                      page_cache_sync_readahead([0K, 1M[)
                                                        btrfs_readpages()
                                                          extent_readpages()

                                                            locks all pages in the file
                                                            range [0K, 128K[ through calls
                                                            to add_to_page_cache_lru()

                                                            __do_contiguous_readpages()

                                                               finds ordered extent A

                                                               waits for it to complete

   btrfs_get_blocks_direct() called again

     lock_extent_direct(range [8K, 16K[)

       finds a page in range [8K, 16K[ through
       btrfs_page_exists_in_range()

       invalidate_inode_pages2_range([8K, 16K[)

         --> tries to lock pages that are already
             locked by the task at CPU 2

         --> our task, running __blockdev_direct_IO(),
             hangs waiting to lock the pages and the
             submit bio callback, btrfs_submit_direct(),
             ends up never being called, resulting in the
             ordered extent A never completing (because a
             corresponding bio is never submitted) and
             CPU 2 will wait for it forever while holding
             the pages locked
              ---> deadlock!

Fix this by removing the page invalidation approach when attempting to
lock the range for IO from the callback btrfs_get_blocks_direct() and
falling back buffered IO. This was a rare case anyway and well behaved
applications do not mix concurrent direct IO writes with buffered reads
anyway, being a concurrent defrag the only normal case that could lead
to the deadlock.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-17 10:59:50 +00:00
Filipe Manana
14543774bd Btrfs: fix error path when failing to submit bio for direct IO write
Commit 61de718fce ("Btrfs: fix memory corruption on failure to submit
bio for direct IO") fixed problems with the error handling code after we
fail to submit a bio for direct IO. However there were 2 problems that it
did not address when the failure is due to memory allocation failures for
direct IO writes:

1) We considered that there could be only one ordered extent for the whole
   IO range, which is not always true, as we can have multiple;

2) It did not set the bit BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE in the ordered extent,
   which can make other tasks running btrfs_wait_logged_extents() hang
   forever, since they wait for that bit to be set. The general assumption
   is that regardless of an error, the BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE is always set
   and it precedes setting the bit BTRFS_ORDERED_COMPLETE.

Fix these issues by moving part of the btrfs_endio_direct_write() handler
into a new helper function and having that new helper function called when
we fail to allocate memory to submit the bio (and its private object) for
a direct IO write.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2015-12-17 10:59:49 +00:00
Filipe Manana
7785a663c4 Btrfs: fix memory leaks after transaction is aborted
When a transaction is aborted, or its commit fails before writing the new
superblock and calling btrfs_finish_extent_commit(), we leak reference
counts on the block groups attached to the transaction's delete_bgs list,
because btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is never called for those two cases.
Fix this by dropping their references at btrfs_put_transaction(), which
is called when transactions are aborted (by making the transaction kthread
commit the transaction) or if their commits fail.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-17 10:59:48 +00:00
Filipe Manana
50460e3718 Btrfs: fix race when finishing dev replace leading to transaction abort
During the final phase of a device replace operation, I ran into a
transaction abort that resulted in the following trace:

[23919.655368] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 30175 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9843 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]()
[23919.664742] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[23919.665749] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 parport psmouse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_core evdev microcode pcspkr button serio_raw ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic ata_piix virtio_pci floppy virtio_ring libata e1000 virtio scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[23919.679442] CPU: 10 PID: 30175 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[23919.682392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[23919.689151]  0000000000000000 ffff8804020cbb50 ffffffff812566f4 ffff8804020cbb98
[23919.692604]  ffff8804020cbb88 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa03eea69 ffff88041b678a48
[23919.694230]  ffff88042ac38000 ffff88041b678930 00000000fffffffe ffff8804020cbbf0
[23919.696716] Call Trace:
[23919.698669]  [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[23919.700597]  [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8
[23919.701958]  [<ffffffffa03eea69>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.703612]  [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50
[23919.705047]  [<ffffffffa03eea69>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.706967]  [<ffffffffa0402097>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x2dd [btrfs]
[23919.708611]  [<ffffffffa0402300>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[23919.710099]  [<ffffffffa03ef0b8>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x121/0x28b [btrfs]
[23919.711970]  [<ffffffffa0413025>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7d3/0xc6d [btrfs]
[23919.713602]  [<ffffffff8108b78f>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[23919.714756]  [<ffffffff81086dbc>] ? percpu_down_read+0x51/0x78
[23919.716155]  [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.718918]  [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.724170]  [<ffffffff8116b579>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[23919.725482]  [<ffffffff8117c1d7>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[23919.726790]  [<ffffffff8117c5ef>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x406/0x4e6
[23919.728428]  [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[23919.729642]  [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[23919.730782]  [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[23919.731847]  [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[23919.733330] ---[ end trace 166ef301a335832a ]---

This is due to a race between device replace and chunk allocation, which
the following diagram illustrates:

         CPU 1                                    CPU 2

 btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()

   at this point
    dev_replace->tgtdev->devid ==
    BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID (0ULL)

   ...

   btrfs_start_transaction()
   btrfs_commit_transaction()

                                               btrfs_fallocate()
                                                 btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
                                                   btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                     --> starts a new transaction
                                                   do_chunk_alloc()
                                                     lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
                                                       btrfs_alloc_chunk()
                                                         --> creates extent map for
                                                             the new chunk with
                                                             em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
                                                             == X (X > 0)
                                                         --> extent map is added to
                                                             fs_info->mapping_tree
                                                         --> initial phase of bg A
                                                             allocation completes
                                                     unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex

   lock fs_info->chunk_mutex

   btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree()
     --> iterates fs_info->mapping_tree and
         replaces the device in every extent
         map's map->stripes[] with
         dev_replace->tgtdev, which still has
         an id of 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)

                                                   btrfs_end_transaction()
                                                     btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
                                                       --> starts final phase of
                                                           bg A creation (update device,
                                                           extent, and chunk trees, etc)
                                                       btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()

                                                         btrfs_update_device()
                                                           --> attempts to update a device
                                                               item with ID == 0ULL
                                                               (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
                                                               which is the current ID of
                                                               bg A's
                                                               em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
                                                           --> doesn't find such item
                                                               returns -ENOENT
                                                           --> the device id should have been X
                                                               and not 0ULL

                                                       got -ENOENT from
                                                       btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
                                                       and aborts current transaction

   finishes setting up the target device,
   namely it sets tgtdev->devid to the value
   of srcdev->devid, which is X (and X > 0)

   frees the srcdev

   unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex

So fix this by taking the device list mutex when processing the chunk's
extent map stripes to update the device items. This avoids getting the
wrong device id and use-after-free problems if the task finishing a
chunk allocation grabs the replaced device, which is freed while the
dev replace task is holding the device list mutex.

This happened while running fstest btrfs/071.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2015-12-17 10:59:46 +00:00
Chris Mason
1d3a5a82fe Merge branch 'for-chris-4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fdmanana/linux into for-linus-4.4 2015-12-15 09:09:59 -08:00
Chris Mason
bb1591b4ea Btrfs: check prepare_uptodate_page() error code earlier
prepare_pages() may end up calling prepare_uptodate_page() twice if our
write only spans a single page.  But if the first call returns an error,
our page will be unlocked and its not safe to call it again.

This bug goes all the way back to 2011, and it's not something commonly
hit.

While we're here, add a more explicit check for the page being truncated
away.  The bare lock_page() alone is protected only by good thoughts and
i_mutex, which we're sure to regret eventually.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-12-15 09:09:38 -08:00
Chris Mason
1b9b922a3a Btrfs: check for empty bitmap list in setup_cluster_bitmaps
Dave Jones found a warning from kasan in setup_cluster_bitmaps()

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0 at
addr ffff88039bef6828
Read of size 8 by task nfsd/1009
page:ffffea000e6fbd80 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:          (null)
index:0x0
flags: 0x8000000000000000()
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
CPU: 1 PID: 1009 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G        W
4.4.0-rc3-backup-debug+ #1
 ffff880065647b50 000000006bb712c2 ffff88039bef6640 ffffffffa680a43e
 0000004559c00000 ffff88039bef66c8 ffffffffa62638d1 ffffffffa61121c0
 ffff8803a5769de8 0000000000000296 ffff8803a5769df0 0000000000046280
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa680a43e>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x6d
 [<ffffffffa62638d1>] kasan_report_error+0x501/0x520
 [<ffffffffa61121c0>] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x1e0/0x1e0
 [<ffffffffa6263948>] kasan_report+0x58/0x60
 [<ffffffffa6814b00>] ? rb_last+0x10/0x40
 [<ffffffffa66f8af4>] ? setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0
 [<ffffffffa6262ead>] __asan_load8+0x5d/0x70
 [<ffffffffa66f8af4>] setup_cluster_bitmap+0xc4/0x5a0
 [<ffffffffa66f675a>] ? setup_cluster_no_bitmap+0x6a/0x400
 [<ffffffffa66fcd16>] btrfs_find_space_cluster+0x4b6/0x640
 [<ffffffffa66fc860>] ? btrfs_alloc_from_cluster+0x4e0/0x4e0
 [<ffffffffa66fc36e>] ? btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space+0x9e/0xb0
 [<ffffffffa702dc37>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
 [<ffffffffa666a1a1>] find_free_extent+0xba1/0x1520

Andrey noticed this was because we were doing list_first_entry on a list
that might be empty.  Rework the tests a bit so we don't do that.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reprorted-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Reported-by:  Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>
2015-12-15 09:09:33 -08:00
Holger Hoffstätte
94356889c4 btrfs: fix misleading warning when space cache failed to load
When an inconsistent space cache is detected during loading we log a
warning that users frequently mistake as instruction to invalidate the
cache manually, even though this is not required. Fix the message to
indicate that the cache will be rebuilt automatically.

Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-10 11:38:08 +00:00
Filipe Manana
8a7d656f3d Btrfs: fix transaction handle leak in balance
If we fail to allocate a new data chunk, we were jumping to the error path
without release the transaction handle we got before. Fix this by always
releasing it before doing the jump.

Fixes: 2c9fe83552 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-10 11:23:24 +00:00
Filipe Manana
348a0013d5 Btrfs: fix unprotected list move from unused_bgs to deleted_bgs list
As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block
groups from being deleted", the following warning at
extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a
filesysten with "-o discard":

 10263  void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 10264  {
 (...)
 10405                  if (trimming) {
 10406                          WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
 10407                          spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
 10408                          list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
 10409                                    &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
 10410                          spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
 10411                          btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
 10412                  }
 (...)

This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of
unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we
are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list
of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source
list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock).

The following diagram illustrates how this happens:

            CPU 1                                     CPU 2

 cleaner_kthread()
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     sees bg X in list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

     deletes bg X from list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

                                            scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                              searches device tree using
                                              its commit root

                                              finds device extent for
                                              block group X

                                              gets block group X from the tree
                                              fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                              (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                              sets bg X to RO (again)

                                              scrub_chunk(bg X)

                                              sets bg X back to RW mode

                                              adds bg X to the list
                                              fs_info->unused_bgs again,
                                              since it's still unused and
                                              currently not in that list

     sets bg X to RO mode

     btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)

     --> discard is enabled and bg X
         is in the fs_info->unused_bgs
         list again so the warning is
         triggered
     --> we move it from that list into
         the transaction's delete_bgs
         list, but we can have another
         task currently manipulating
         the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs)

Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both
the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This
makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this
lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list
of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously
an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's
not impossible anymore.
Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard").

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-12-10 11:22:38 +00:00
Al Viro
6b2553918d replace ->follow_link() with new method that could stay in RCU mode
new method: ->get_link(); replacement of ->follow_link().  The differences
are:
	* inode and dentry are passed separately
	* might be called both in RCU and non-RCU mode;
the former is indicated by passing it a NULL dentry.
	* when called that way it isn't allowed to block
and should return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD) if it needs to be called
in non-RCU mode.

It's a flagday change - the old method is gone, all in-tree instances
converted.  Conversion isn't hard; said that, so far very few instances
do not immediately bail out when called in RCU mode.  That'll change
in the next commits.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-08 22:41:54 -05:00
Al Viro
21fc61c73c don't put symlink bodies in pagecache into highmem
kmap() in page_follow_link_light() needed to go - allowing to hold
an arbitrary number of kmaps for long is a great way to deadlocking
the system.

new helper (inode_nohighmem(inode)) needs to be used for pagecache
symlinks inodes; done for all in-tree cases.  page_follow_link_light()
instrumented to yell about anything missed.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-08 22:41:36 -05:00
Christoph Hellwig
04b38d6012 vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer
The btrfs clone ioctls are now adopted by other file systems, with NFS
and CIFS already having support for them, and XFS being under active
development.  To avoid growth of various slightly incompatible
implementations, add one to the VFS.  Note that clones are different from
file copies in several ways:

 - they are atomic vs other writers
 - they support whole file clones
 - they support 64-bit legth clones
 - they do not allow partial success (aka short writes)
 - clones are expected to be a fast metadata operation

Because of that it would be rather cumbersome to try to piggyback them on
top of the recent clone_file_range infrastructure.  The converse isn't
true and the clone_file_range system call could try clone file range as
a first attempt to copy, something that further patches will enable.

Based on earlier work from Peng Tao.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-07 23:11:33 -05:00
David Sterba
35de6db28f btrfs: make set_range_writeback return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph. There's a
BUG_ON but it's a sanity check and not an error condition we could
recover from.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
f631157276 btrfs: make extent_range_redirty_for_io return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph. There's a
BUG_ON but it's a sanity check and not an error condition we could
recover from.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
bd1fa4f0b0 btrfs: make extent_range_clear_dirty_for_io return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph. There's a
BUG_ON but it's a sanity check and not an error condition we could
recover from.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
b5227c075b btrfs: make end_extent_writepage return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph.  The branch
in end_bio_extent_writepage has been skipped since
5fd0204355 ("Btrfs: finish ordered extents in their own thread").

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
a9d93e1778 btrfs: make extent_clear_unlock_delalloc return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
69ba39272c btrfs: make clear_extent_buffer_uptodate return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
09c25a8cda btrfs: make set_extent_buffer_uptodate return void
Does not return any errors, nor anything from the callgraph.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
David Sterba
4db8c528cd btrfs: remove a trivial helper btrfs_set_buffer_uptodate
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-07 15:06:45 +01:00
Andreas Gruenbacher
9172abbcd3 btrfs: Use xattr handler infrastructure
Use the VFS xattr handler infrastructure and get rid of similar code in
the filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-06 21:34:14 -05:00
Andreas Gruenbacher
97d7929922 posix acls: Remove duplicate xattr name definitions
Remove POSIX_ACL_XATTR_{ACCESS,DEFAULT} and GFS2_POSIX_ACL_{ACCESS,DEFAULT}
and replace them with the definitions in <include/uapi/linux/xattr.h>.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-06 21:25:17 -05:00
David Sterba
39a27ec100 btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL for xattr and acl allocations
We don't have to use GFP_NOFS in context of ACL or XATTR actions, not
possible to loop through the allocator and it's safe to fail with
ENOMEM.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:03:44 +01:00
David Sterba
61dd5ae65b btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL for allocations of workqueues
We don't have to use GFP_NOFS to allocate workqueue structures, this is
done from mount context or potentially scrub start context, safe to fail
in both cases.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:03:43 +01:00
David Sterba
8d2db7855e btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL for allocations in ioctl handlers
We don't have to use GFP_NOFS in the ioctl handlers because there's no
risk of looping through the allocators back to the filesystem. This
patch covers only allocations that are directly in the ioctl handlers.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:03:43 +01:00
David Sterba
3042460136 btrfs: remove wait from struct btrfs_delalloc_work
The value is 0 and never changes, we can propagate the value, remove
wait and the implied dead code.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:02:21 +01:00
David Sterba
651d494a67 btrfs: sink parameter wait to btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work
There's only one caller and single value, we can propagate it down to
the callee and remove the unused parameter.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:02:21 +01:00
David Sterba
87ad58c5f0 btrfs: make btrfs_close_one_device static
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 15:02:21 +01:00
David Sterba
cd716d8fea btrfs: make lock_extent static inline
One call less reduces stack usage, code slightly reduced as well.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 14:44:59 +01:00
David Sterba
ff13db41f1 btrfs: drop unused parameter from lock_extent_bits
We've always passed 0. Stack usage will slightly decrease.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 14:30:40 +01:00
David Sterba
e83b1d91f8 btrfs: make clear_extent_bit helpers static inline
The funcions just wrap the clear_extent_bit API and generate function
calls. This increases stack consumption and may negatively affect
performance due to icache misses. We can simply make the helpers static
inline and keep the type checking and API untouched. The code slightly
decreases:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 938667	  43670	  23144	1005481	  f57a9	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.before
 939651	  43670	  23144	1006465	  f5b81	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.after

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 14:17:30 +01:00
David Sterba
c63179556a btrfs: make set_extent_bit helpers static inline
The funcions just wrap the set_extent_bit API and generate function
calls. This increases stack consumption and may negatively affect
performance due to icache misses. We can simply make the helpers static
inline and keep the type checking and API untouched. The code slightly
increases:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 938427	  43670	  23144	1005241	  f56b9	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.before
 938667	  43670	  23144	1005481	  f57a9	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2015-12-03 14:08:11 +01:00
Zach Brown
3db11b2eec btrfs: add .copy_file_range file operation
This rearranges the existing COPY_RANGE ioctl implementation so that the
.copy_file_range file operation can call the core loop that copies file
data extent items.

The extent copying loop is lifted up into its own function.  It retains
the core btrfs error checks that should be shared.

Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
[Anna Schumaker: Make flags an unsigned int,
                 Check for COPY_FR_REFLINK]
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-12-01 14:00:54 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
80e0c505b2 Merge branch 'for-linus-4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
 "This has Mark Fasheh's patches to fix quota accounting during subvol
  deletion, which we've been working on for a while now.  The patch is
  pretty small but it's a key fix.

  Otherwise it's a random assortment"

* 'for-linus-4.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  btrfs: fix balance range usage filters in 4.4-rc
  btrfs: qgroup: account shared subtree during snapshot delete
  Btrfs: use btrfs_get_fs_root in resolve_indirect_ref
  btrfs: qgroup: fix quota disable during rescan
  Btrfs: fix race between cleaner kthread and space cache writeout
  Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block groups from being deleted
  Btrfs: fix race between scrub and block group deletion
  btrfs: fix rcu warning during device replace
  btrfs: Continue replace when set_block_ro failed
  btrfs: fix clashing number of the enhanced balance usage filter
  Btrfs: fix the number of transaction units needed to remove a block group
  Btrfs: use global reserve when deleting unused block group after ENOSPC
  Btrfs: tests: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR()
  btrfs: fix signed overflows in btrfs_sync_file
2015-11-27 15:45:45 -08:00
Holger Hoffstätte
dba72cb30b btrfs: fix balance range usage filters in 4.4-rc
There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit bc3094673f
(btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that
existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks
are skipped.

After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged
balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not
set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem
was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to
patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing
btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter
function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit.

Signed-off-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Fixes: bc3094673f ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:27:33 -08:00
Mark Fasheh
82bd101b52 btrfs: qgroup: account shared subtree during snapshot delete
Commit 0ed4792 ('btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup
mechanism.') removed our qgroup accounting during
btrfs_drop_snapshot(). Predictably, this results in qgroup numbers
going bad shortly after a snapshot is removed.

Fix this by adding a dirty extent record when we encounter extents during
our shared subtree walk. This effectively restores the functionality we had
with the original shared subtree walking code in 1152651 (btrfs: qgroup:
account shared subtrees during snapshot delete).

The idea with the original patch (and this one) is that shared subtrees can
get skipped during drop_snapshot. The shared subtree walk then allows us a
chance to visit those extents and add them to the qgroup work for later
processing. This ultimately makes the accounting for drop snapshot work.

The new qgroup code nicely handles all the other extents during the tree
walk via the ref dec/inc functions so we don't have to add actions beyond
what we had originally.

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:27:33 -08:00
Josef Bacik
2d9e977610 Btrfs: use btrfs_get_fs_root in resolve_indirect_ref
The backref code will look up the fs_root we're trying to resolve our indirect
refs for, unfortunately we use btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name, which returns -ENOENT
if the ref is 0.  This isn't helpful for the qgroup stuff with snapshot delete
as it won't be able to search down the snapshot we are deleting, which will
cause us to miss roots.  So use btrfs_get_fs_root and send false for check_ref
so we can always get the root we're looking for.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:22:08 -08:00
Justin Maggard
967ef5131e btrfs: qgroup: fix quota disable during rescan
There's a race condition that leads to a NULL pointer dereference if you
disable quotas while a quota rescan is running.  To fix this, we just need
to wait for the quota rescan worker to actually exit before tearing down
the quota structures.

Signed-off-by: Justin Maggard <jmaggard@netgear.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:22:08 -08:00
Filipe Manana
036a9348dc Btrfs: fix race between cleaner kthread and space cache writeout
When a block group becomes unused and the cleaner kthread is currently
running, we can end up getting the current transaction aborted with error
-ENOENT when we try to commit the transaction, leading to the following
trace:

  [59779.258768] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5990 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3740 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x17c/0x214 [btrfs]()
  [59779.272594] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
  (...)
  [59779.291137] Call Trace:
  [59779.291621]  [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
  [59779.292543]  [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8
  [59779.293435]  [<ffffffffa04cb81f>] ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x17c/0x214 [btrfs]
  [59779.295000]  [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50
  [59779.296138]  [<ffffffffa04c2721>] ? write_one_cache_group.isra.32+0x77/0x82 [btrfs]
  [59779.297663]  [<ffffffffa04cb81f>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x17c/0x214 [btrfs]
  [59779.299141]  [<ffffffffa0549b0d>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x1de/0x261 [btrfs]
  [59779.300359]  [<ffffffffa04dd5b6>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4c4/0x99c [btrfs]
  [59779.301805]  [<ffffffffa04b5df4>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x145/0x1ad [btrfs]
  [59779.302893]  [<ffffffff81196634>] sync_filesystem+0x7f/0x93
  (...)
  [59779.318186] ---[ end trace 577e2daff90da33a ]---

The following diagram illustrates a sequence of steps leading to this
problem:

       CPU 1                                             CPU 2

                           <at transaction N>

                                                        adds bg A to list
                                                        fs_info->unused_bgs

                                                        adds bg B to list
                                                        fs_info->unused_bgs

                           <transaction kthread
                            commits transaction N
                            and wakes up the
                            cleaner kthread>

  cleaner kthread
    delete_unused_bgs()

      sees bg A in list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

      btrfs_start_transaction()

                           <transaction N + 1 starts>

      deletes bg A

                                                        update_block_group(bg C)

                                                          --> adds bg C to list
                                                              fs_info->unused_bgs

      deletes bg B

      sees bg C in the list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

      btrfs_remove_chunk(bg C)
        btrfs_remove_block_group(bg C)

          --> checks if the block group
              is in a dirty list, and
              because it isn't now, it
              does nothing

          --> the block group item
              is deleted from the
              extent tree

                                                          --> adds bg C to list
                                                              transaction->dirty_bgs

                                                         some task calls
                                                         btrfs_commit_transaction(t N + 1)
                                                           commit_cowonly_roots()
                                                             btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups()
                                                               --> sees bg C in cur_trans->dirty_bgs
                                                               --> calls write_one_cache_group()
                                                                   which returns -ENOENT because
                                                                   it did not find the block group
                                                                   item in the extent tree
                                                               --> transaction aborte with -ENOENT
                                                                   because write_one_cache_group()
                                                                   returned that error

So fix this by adding a block group to the list of dirty block groups
before adding it to the list of unused block groups.

This happened on a stress test using fsstress plus concurrent calls to
fallocate 20G and truncate (releasing part of the space allocated with
fallocate).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:22:08 -08:00
Filipe Manana
758f2dfcf8 Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block groups from being deleted
Currently scrub can race with the cleaner kthread when the later attempts
to delete an unused block group, and the result is preventing the cleaner
kthread from ever deleting later the block group - unless the block group
becomes used and unused again. The following diagram illustrates that
race:

              CPU 1                                 CPU 2

 cleaner kthread
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     gets block group X from
     fs_info->unused_bgs and
     removes it from that list

                                             scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                               searches device tree using
                                               its commit root

                                               finds device extent for
                                               block group X

                                               gets block group X from the tree
                                               fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                               (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                               sets bg X to RO

     sees the block group is
     already RO and therefore
     doesn't delete it nor adds
     it back to unused list

So fix this by making scrub add the block group again to the list of
unused block groups if the block group is still unused when it finished
scrubbing it and it hasn't been removed already.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:22:08 -08:00
Filipe Manana
020d5b7366 Btrfs: fix race between scrub and block group deletion
Scrub can race with the cleaner kthread deleting block groups that are
unused (and with relocation too) leading to a failure with error -EINVAL
that gets returned to user space.

The following diagram illustrates how it happens:

              CPU 1                                 CPU 2

 cleaner kthread
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     gets block group X from
     fs_info->unused_bgs

     sets block group to RO

       btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)

         deletes device extents

                                         scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                           searches device tree using
                                           its commit root

                                           finds device extent for
                                           block group X

                                           gets block group X from the tree
                                           fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                           (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                           sets bg X to RO (again)

          btrfs_remove_block_group(bg X)

            deletes block group from
            fs_info->block_group_cache_tree

            removes extent map from
            fs_info->mapping_tree

                                               scrub_chunk(offset X)

                                                 searches fs_info->mapping_tree
                                                 for extent map starting at
                                                 offset X

                                                    --> doesn't find any such
                                                        extent map
                                                    --> returns -EINVAL and scrub
                                                        errors out to userspace
                                                        with -EINVAL

Fix this by dealing with an extent map lookup failure as an indicator of
block group deletion.
Issue reproduced with fstest btrfs/071.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:51 -08:00
David Sterba
31388ab2ed btrfs: fix rcu warning during device replace
The test btrfs/011 triggers a rcu warning
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286 Tainted: G        W
-------------------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1977 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
4 locks held by btrfs/28786:

0:  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc785>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x45/0xa00 [btrfs]
1:  (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc84f>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x10f/0xa00 [btrfs]
2:  (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc868>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x128/0xa00 [btrfs]
3:  (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc87d>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x13d/0xa00 [btrfs]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 28786 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W       4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286
Hardware name: Intel Corporation SandyBridge Platform/To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS ASNBCPT1.86C.0031.B00.1006301607 06/30/2010
0000000000000001 ffff8800a07dfb48 ffffffff8141d47b 0000000000000001
0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff8801464a4f00 ffff8800a07dfb78
ffffffff810cd883 ffff880146eb9400 ffff8800a3698600 ffff8800a33fe220
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8141d47b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x74
[<ffffffff810cd883>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x103/0x140
[<ffffffffa0071261>] btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810d354d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff81449536>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0x66/0x80
[<ffffffffa00bcc15>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x4d5/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bc96e>] ? btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x22e/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a8795>] ? btrfs_scrub_dev+0x415/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa003ea69>] ? btrfs_start_transaction+0x9/0x20 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bda79>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x339/0x590 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81196aa5>] ? __might_fault+0x95/0xa0
[<ffffffffa0078638>] btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace+0x118/0x160 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffffa007c914>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x24/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa007ce43>] btrfs_ioctl+0x553/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffff811d6eb1>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811d6f1c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8c/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811e3336>] ? __fget_light+0x86/0xb0
[<ffffffff811e3369>] ? __fdget+0x9/0x20
[<ffffffff811d7451>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x21/0x80
[<ffffffff811d7483>] SyS_ioctl+0x53/0x80
[<ffffffff81b1efd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This is because of unprotected use of rcu_dereference in
btrfs_scratch_superblocks. We can't add rcu locks around the whole
function because we read the superblock.

The fix will use the rcu string buffer directly without the rcu locking.
Thi is safe as the device will not go away in the meantime. We're
holding the device list mutexes.

Restructuring the code to narrow down the rcu section turned out to be
impossible, we need to call filp_open (through update_dev_time) on the
buffer and this could call kmalloc/__might_sleep. We could call kstrdup
with GFP_ATOMIC but it's not absolutely necessary.

Fixes: 12b1c2637b (Btrfs: enhance btrfs_scratch_superblock to scratch all superblocks)
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:51 -08:00
Zhaolei
76a8efa171 btrfs: Continue replace when set_block_ro failed
xfstests/011 failed in node with small_size filesystem.
Can be reproduced by following script:
  DEV_LIST="/dev/vdd /dev/vde"
  DEV_REPLACE="/dev/vdf"

  do_test()
  {
      local mkfs_opt="$1"
      local size="$2"

      dmesg -c >/dev/null
      umount $SCRATCH_MNT &>/dev/null

      echo  mkfs.btrfs -f $mkfs_opt "${DEV_LIST[*]}"
      mkfs.btrfs -f $mkfs_opt "${DEV_LIST[@]}" || return 1
      mount "${DEV_LIST[0]}" $SCRATCH_MNT

      echo -n "Writing big files"
      dd if=/dev/urandom of=$SCRATCH_MNT/t0 bs=1M count=1 >/dev/null 2>&1
      for ((i = 1; i <= size; i++)); do
          echo -n .
          /bin/cp $SCRATCH_MNT/t0 $SCRATCH_MNT/t$i || return 1
      done
      echo

      echo Start replace
      btrfs replace start -Bf "${DEV_LIST[0]}" "$DEV_REPLACE" $SCRATCH_MNT || {
          dmesg
          return 1
      }
      return 0
  }

  # Set size to value near fs size
  # for example, 1897 can trigger this bug in 2.6G device.
  #
  ./do_test "-d raid1 -m raid1" 1897

System will report replace fail with following warning in dmesg:
 [  134.710853] BTRFS: dev_replace from /dev/vdd (devid 1) to /dev/vdf started
 [  135.542390] BTRFS: btrfs_scrub_dev(/dev/vdd, 1, /dev/vdf) failed -28
 [  135.543505] ------------[ cut here ]------------
 [  135.544127] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4080 at fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c:428 btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x398/0x440()
 [  135.545276] Modules linked in:
 [  135.545681] CPU: 0 PID: 4080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.3.0 #256
 [  135.546439] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
 [  135.547798]  ffffffff81c5bfcf ffff88003cbb3d28 ffffffff817fe7b5 0000000000000000
 [  135.548774]  ffff88003cbb3d60 ffffffff810a88f1 ffff88002b030000 00000000ffffffe4
 [  135.549774]  ffff88003c080000 ffff88003c082588 ffff88003c28ab60 ffff88003cbb3d70
 [  135.550758] Call Trace:
 [  135.551086]  [<ffffffff817fe7b5>] dump_stack+0x44/0x55
 [  135.551737]  [<ffffffff810a88f1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
 [  135.552487]  [<ffffffff810a89e5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
 [  135.553211]  [<ffffffff81448c88>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x398/0x440
 [  135.554051]  [<ffffffff81412c3e>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1d2e/0x25c0
 [  135.554722]  [<ffffffff8114c7ba>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaa/0xf0
 [  135.555506]  [<ffffffff8111ab36>] ? current_kernel_time64+0x56/0xa0
 [  135.556304]  [<ffffffff81201e3d>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x30d/0x580
 [  135.557009]  [<ffffffff8114c7ba>] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaa/0xf0
 [  135.557855]  [<ffffffff810011d1>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x61/0x70
 [  135.558669]  [<ffffffff8120d1c1>] ? __fget_light+0x61/0x90
 [  135.559374]  [<ffffffff81202124>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
 [  135.559987]  [<ffffffff81809857>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
 [  135.560842] ---[ end trace 2a5c1fc3205abbdd ]---

Reason:
 When big data writen to fs, the whole free space will be allocated
 for data chunk.
 And operation as scrub need to set_block_ro(), and when there is
 only one metadata chunk in system(or other metadata chunks
 are all full), the function will try to allocate a new chunk,
 and failed because no space in device.

Fix:
 When set_block_ro failed for metadata chunk, it is not a problem
 because scrub_lock paused commit_trancaction in same time, and
 metadata are always cowed, so the on-the-fly writepages will not
 write data into same place with scrub/replace.
 Let replace continue in this case is no problem.

Tested by above script, and xfstests/011, plus 100 times xfstests/070.

Changelog v1->v2:
1: Add detail comments in source and commit-message.
2: Add dmesg detail into commit-message.
3: Limit return value of -ENOSPC to be passed.
All suggested by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>

Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:51 -08:00
David Sterba
da02c68989 btrfs: fix clashing number of the enhanced balance usage filter
I've accidentally picked an already used number for the enhanced usage
filter represented by BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE, clashing with
BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT. Introduced during the development phase,
no backward compatibility issues.

Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: bc3094673f ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:50 -08:00
Filipe Manana
7fd01182d1 Btrfs: fix the number of transaction units needed to remove a block group
We were using only 1 transaction unit when attempting to delete an unused
block group but in reality we need 3 + N units, where N corresponds to the
number of stripes. We were accounting only for the addition of the orphan
item (for the block group's free space cache inode) but we were not
accounting that we need to delete one block group item from the extent
tree, one free space item from the tree of tree roots and N device extent
items from the device tree.

While one unit is not enough, it worked most of the time because for each
single unit we are too pessimistic and assume an entire tree path, with
the highest possible heigth (8), needs to be COWed with eventual node
splits at every possible level in the tree, so there was usually enough
reserved space for removing all the items and adding the orphan item.

However after adding the orphan item, writepages() can by called by the VM
subsystem against the btree inode when we are under memory pressure, which
causes writeback to start for the nodes we COWed before, this forces the
operation to remove the free space item to COW again some (or all of) the
same nodes (in the tree of tree roots). Even without writepages() being
called, we could fail with ENOSPC because these items are located in
multiple trees and one of them might have a higher heigth and require
node/leaf splits at many levels, exhausting all the reserved space before
removing all the items and adding the orphan.

In the kernel 4.0 release, commit 3d84be7991 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in
btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group"), we attempted to fix
a BUG_ON due to ENOSPC when trying to add the orphan item by making the
cleaner kthread reserve one transaction unit before attempting to remove
the block group, but this was not enough. We had a couple user reports
still hitting the same BUG_ON after 4.0, like Stefan Priebe's report on
a 4.2-rc6 kernel for example:

    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46070.html

So fix this by reserving all the necessary units of metadata.

Reported-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Fixes: 3d84be7991 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:50 -08:00
Filipe Manana
8eab77ff16 Btrfs: use global reserve when deleting unused block group after ENOSPC
It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:50 -08:00
Dan Carpenter
89b6c8d1e4 Btrfs: tests: checking for NULL instead of IS_ERR()
btrfs_alloc_dummy_root() return an error pointer on failure, it never
returns NULL.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-11-25 05:19:50 -08:00