Now the TDX_HYPERCALL asm is basically identical to the TDX_MODULE_CALL
with both '\saved' and '\ret' enabled, with two minor things though:
1) The way to restore the structure pointer is different
The TDX_HYPERCALL uses RCX as spare to restore the structure pointer,
but the TDX_MODULE_CALL assumes no spare register can be used. In other
words, TDX_MODULE_CALL already covers what TDX_HYPERCALL does.
2) TDX_MODULE_CALL only clears shared registers for TDH.VP.ENTER
For this just need to make that code available for the non-host case.
Thus, remove the TDX_HYPERCALL and reimplement the __tdx_hypercall()
using the TDX_MODULE_CALL.
Extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL to cover "clear shared registers" for
TDG.VP.VMCALL. Introduce a new __tdcall_saved_ret() to replace the
temporary __tdcall_hypercall().
The __tdcall_saved_ret() can also be used for those new TDCALLs which
require more input/output registers than the basic TDCALLs do.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e68a2473fb6f5bcd78b078cae7510e9d0753b3df.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
Now the 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' and 'struct tdx_module_args' are
almost the same, and the TDX_HYPERCALL and TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro
share similar code pattern too. The __tdx_hypercall() and __tdcall()
should be unified to use the same assembly code.
As a preparation to unify them, simplify the TDX_HYPERCALL to make it
more like the TDX_MODULE_CALL.
The TDX_HYPERCALL takes the pointer of 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' as
function call argument, and does below extra things comparing to the
TDX_MODULE_CALL:
1) It sets RAX to 0 (TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf) internally;
2) It sets RCX to the (fixed) bitmap of shared registers internally;
3) It calls __tdx_hypercall_failed() internally (and panics) when the
TDCALL instruction itself fails;
4) After TDCALL, it moves R10 to RAX to return the return code of the
VMCALL leaf, regardless the '\ret' asm macro argument;
Firstly, change the TDX_HYPERCALL to take the same function call
arguments as the TDX_MODULE_CALL does: TDCALL leaf ID, and the pointer
to 'struct tdx_module_args'. Then 1) and 2) can be moved to the
caller:
- TDG.VP.VMCALL leaf ID can be passed via the function call argument;
- 'struct tdx_module_args' is 'struct tdx_hypercall_args' + RCX, thus
the bitmap of shared registers can be passed via RCX in the
structure.
Secondly, to move 3) and 4) out of assembly, make the TDX_HYPERCALL
always save output registers to the structure. The caller then can:
- Call __tdx_hypercall_failed() when TDX_HYPERCALL returns error;
- Return R10 in the structure as the return code of the VMCALL leaf;
With above changes, change the asm function from __tdx_hypercall() to
__tdcall_hypercall(), and reimplement __tdx_hypercall() as the C wrapper
of it. This avoids having to add another wrapper of __tdx_hypercall()
(_tdx_hypercall() is already taken).
The __tdcall_hypercall() will be replaced with a __tdcall() variant
using TDX_MODULE_CALL in a later commit as the final goal is to have one
assembly to handle both TDCALL and TDVMCALL.
Currently, the __tdx_hypercall() asm is in '.noinstr.text'. To keep
this unchanged, annotate __tdx_hypercall(), which is a C function now,
as 'noinstr'.
Remove the __tdx_hypercall_ret() as __tdx_hypercall() already does so.
Implement __tdx_hypercall() in tdx-shared.c so it can be shared with the
compressed code.
Opportunistically fix a checkpatch error complaining using space around
parenthesis '(' and ')' while moving the bitmap of shared registers to
<asm/shared/tdx.h>.
[ dhansen: quash new calls of __tdx_hypercall_ret() that showed up ]
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0cbf25e7aee3256288045023a31f65f0cef90af4.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
The TDX guest live migration support (TDX 1.5) adds new TDCALL/SEAMCALL
leaf functions. Those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs take additional registers
for input (R10-R13) and output (R12-R13). TDG.SERVTD.RD is an example.
Also, the current TDX_MODULE_CALL doesn't aim to handle TDH.VP.ENTER
SEAMCALL, which monitors the TDG.VP.VMCALL in input/output registers
when it returns in case of VMCALL from TDX guest.
With those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and the TDH.VP.ENTER covered, the
TDX_MODULE_CALL macro basically needs to handle the same input/output
registers as the TDX_HYPERCALL does. And as a result, they also share
similar logic in the assembly, thus should be unified to use one common
assembly.
Extend the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm to support the new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and
also the TDH.VP.ENTER SEAMCALL. Eventually it will be unified with the
TDX_HYPERCALL.
The new input/output registers fit with the "callee-saved" registers in
the x86 calling convention. Add a new "saved" parameter to support
those new TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs and TDH.VP.ENTER and keep the existing
TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs minimally impacted.
For TDH.VP.ENTER, after it returns the registers shared by the guest
contain guest's values. Explicitly clear them to prevent speculative
use of guest's values.
Note most TDX live migration related SEAMCALLs may also clobber AVX*
state ("AVX, AVX2 and AVX512 state: may be reset to the architectural
INIT state" -- see TDH.EXPORT.MEM for example). And TDH.VP.ENTER also
clobbers XMM0-XMM15 when the corresponding bit is set in RCX. Don't
handle them in the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro but let the caller save and
restore when needed.
This is basically based on Peter's code.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d4785de7c392f7c5684407f6c24a73b92148ec49.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL asm macro, which handles both TDCALL and
SEAMCALL, takes one parameter for each input register and an optional
'struct tdx_module_output' (a collection of output registers) as output.
This is different from the TDX_HYPERCALL macro which uses a single
'struct tdx_hypercall_args' to carry all input/output registers.
The newer TDX versions introduce more TDCALLs/SEAMCALLs which use more
input/output registers. Also, the TDH.VP.ENTER (which isn't covered
by the current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro) basically can use all registers
that the TDX_HYPERCALL does. The current TDX_MODULE_CALL macro isn't
extendible to cover those cases.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, simplify the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro
to use a single structure 'struct tdx_module_args' to carry all the
input/output registers. Currently, R10/R11 are only used as output
register but not as input by any TDCALL/SEAMCALL. Change to also use
R10/R11 as input register to make input/output registers symmetric.
Currently, the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro depends on the caller to pass a
non-NULL 'struct tdx_module_output' to get additional output registers.
Similar to the TDX_HYPERCALL macro, change the TDX_MODULE_CALL macro to
take a new 'ret' macro argument to indicate whether to save the output
registers to the 'struct tdx_module_args'. Also introduce a new
__tdcall_ret() for that purpose, similar to the __tdx_hypercall_ret().
Note the tdcall(), which is a wrapper of __tdcall(), is called by three
callers: tdx_parse_tdinfo(), tdx_get_ve_info() and tdx_early_init().
The former two need the additional output but the last one doesn't. For
simplicity, make tdcall() always call __tdcall_ret() to avoid another
"_ret()" wrapper. The last caller tdx_early_init() isn't performance
critical anyway.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/483616c1762d85eb3a3c3035a7de061cfacf2f14.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
__tdx_module_call() is only used by the TDX guest to issue TDCALL to the
TDX module. Rename it to __tdcall() to match its behaviour, e.g., it
cannot be used to make host-side SEAMCALL.
Also rename tdx_module_call() which is a wrapper of __tdx_module_call()
to tdcall().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/785d20d99fbcd0db8262c94da6423375422d8c75.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
If SEAMCALL fails with VMFailInvalid, the SEAM software (e.g., the TDX
module) won't have chance to set any output register. Skip saving the
output registers to the structure in this case.
Also, as '.Lno_output_struct' is the very last symbol before RET, rename
it to '.Lout' to make it short.
Opportunistically make the asm directives unindented.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/704088f5b4d72c7e24084f7f15bd1ac5005b7213.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
In the TDX_HYPERCALL asm, after the TDCALL instruction returns from the
untrusted VMM, the registers that the TDX guest shares to the VMM need
to be cleared to avoid speculative execution of VMM-provided values.
RSI is specified in the bitmap of those registers, but it is missing
when zeroing out those registers in the current TDX_HYPERCALL.
It was there when it was originally added in commit 752d13305c
("x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments"), but was
later removed in commit 1e70c68037 ("x86/tdx: Do not corrupt
frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()"), which was correct because %rsi is
later restored in the "pop %rsi". However a later commit 7a3a401874
("x86/tdx: Drop flags from __tdx_hypercall()") removed that "pop %rsi"
but forgot to add the "xor %rsi, %rsi" back.
Fix by adding it back.
Fixes: 7a3a401874 ("x86/tdx: Drop flags from __tdx_hypercall()")
Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e7d1157074a0b45d34564d5f17f3e0ffee8115e9.1692096753.git.kai.huang%40intel.com
After TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI got dropped, the only flag left is
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT. The flag indicates if the caller wants to see
tdx_hypercall_args updated based on the hypercall output.
Drop the flags and provide __tdx_hypercall_ret() that matches
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT semantics.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321003511.9469-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
- Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
- Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE
- Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are
delivered via a #VE.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=UpyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) updates from Dave Hansen:
"Other than a minor fixup, the content here is to ensure that TDX
guests never see virtualization exceptions (#VE's) that might be
induced by the untrusted VMM.
This is a highly desirable property. Without it, #VE exception
handling would fall somewhere between NMIs, machine checks and total
insanity. With it, #VE handling remains pretty mundane.
Summary:
- Fixup comment typo
- Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
- Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE)
- Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are delivered
via a #VE"
* tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/tdx: Do not corrupt frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()
x86/tdx: Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES
x86/tdx: Relax SEPT_VE_DISABLE check for debug TD
x86/tdx: Use ReportFatalError to report missing SEPT_VE_DISABLE
x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments
x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments
x86/tdx: Add more registers to struct tdx_hypercall_args
x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
If compiled with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y, objtool is not happy that
__tdx_hypercall() messes up RBP:
objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x7f: return with modified stack frame
Rework the function to store TDX_HCALL_ flags on stack instead of RBP.
[ dhansen: minor changelog tweaks ]
Fixes: c30c4b2555 ("x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301290255.buUBs99R-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230130135354.27674-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
So far __tdx_hypercall() only handles six arguments for VMCALL.
Expanding it to six more register would allow to cover more use-cases
like ReportFatalError() and Hyper-V hypercalls.
With all preparations in place, the expansion is pretty straight
forward.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-5-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
RDI is the first argument to __tdx_hypercall() that used to pass pointer
to struct tdx_hypercall_args. RSI is the second argument that contains
flags, such as TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT and TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI.
RDI and RSI can also be used as arguments to TDVMCALL leafs. Move RDI to
RAX and RSI to RBP to free up them for the hypercall arguments.
RAX saved on stack during TDCALL as it returns status code in the
register.
RBP value has to be restored before returning from __tdx_hypercall() as
it is callee-saved register.
This is preparatory patch. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-4-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.
Fix the comment. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
objtool found a few cases where this code called out into instrumented
code:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x2c: call to hcall_func.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x3f: call to __tdx_hypercall() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x66: call to __tdx_hypercall_failed() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fix it by:
- moving TDX tdcall assembly methods into .noinstr.text (they are already noistr-clean)
- marking __tdx_hypercall_failed() as 'noinstr'
- annotating hcall_func() as __always_inline
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.111485720@infradead.org
Now that arch_cpu_idle() is expected to return with IRQs disabled,
avoid the useless STI/CLI dance.
Per the specs this is supposed to work, but nobody has yet relied up
this behaviour so broken implementations are possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.682137572@infradead.org
Because build-testing is over-rated, fix a few trivial objtool complaints:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_module_call+0x3e: missing int3 after ret
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x6e: missing int3 after ret
Fixes: eb94f1b6a7 ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520083839.GR2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
objdump complains:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall()+0x74: unreachable instruction
because __tdx_hypercall_failed() won't return but panic the guest.
Annotate that that is ok and desired.
Fixes: eb94f1b6a7 ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420115025.5448-1-bp@alien8.de
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops
instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It
is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup
handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI)
before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()).
To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated
using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found
in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication
Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT].
In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is
used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not
work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to
be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of
safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case.
To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the
tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer
for a valid TDX guest.
Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding
safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls
only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for
safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these
are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs
like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer
expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall
mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX
specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL.
In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary
layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host
and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU
mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the
TDCALL instruction.
A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM.
The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is
used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate
with the VMM is called TDVMCALL.
Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM
(using the TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_module_call() - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via
TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_hypercall() - Used by the guest to request services from
the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL).
Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error
handling support for the TDCALL failure.
The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are
implemented in assembly in a .S file. The TDCALL ABI requires
shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be
awkward with inline assembly.
Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same
number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current
worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer
than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap)
instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse.
For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI
specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL
Interface".
Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
