There is an impedance mismatch between the scatterlist API using unsigned
int and our memory/page accounting in unsigned long. That is we may try
to create a scatterlist for a large object that overflows returning a
small table into which we try to fit very many pages. As the object size
is under the control of userspace, we have to be prudent and catch the
conversion errors.
To catch the implicit truncation we check before calling scattterlist
creation Apis. we use overflows_type check and report E2BIG if the
overflows may raise. When caller does not return errno, use WARN_ON to
report a problem.
This is already used in our create ioctls to indicate if the uABI request
is simply too large for the backing store. Failing that type check,
we have a second check at sg_alloc_table time to make sure the values
we are passing into the scatterlist API are not truncated.
v2: Move added i915_utils's macro into drm_util header (Jani N)
v5: Fix macros to be enclosed in parentheses for complex values
Fix too long line warning
v8: Replace safe_conversion() with check_assign() (Kees)
v14: Remove shadowing macros of scatterlist creation api and fix to
explicitly overflow check where the scatterlist creation APIs are
called. (Jani)
v15: Add missing returning of error code when the WARN_ON() has been
detected. (Jani)
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Co-developed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221228192252.917299-3-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
We rely on page_sizes.sg in setup_scratch_page() reporting the correct
value if the underlying sgl is not contiguous, however in
get_pages_internal() we are only looking at the layout of the created
pages when calculating the sg_page_sizes, and not the final sgl, which
could in theory be completely different. In such a situation we might
incorrectly think we have a 64K scratch page, when it is actually only
4K or similar split over multiple non-contiguous entries, which could
lead to broken behaviour when touching the scratch space within the
padding of a 64K GTT page-table. For most of the other backends we
already just call i915_sg_dma_sizes() on the final mapping, so rather
just move that into __i915_gem_object_set_pages() to avoid such issues
coming back to bite us later.
v2: Update missing conversion in gvt
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221108103238.165447-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
The object ops i915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM and the object
I915_BO_ALLOC_STRUCT_PAGE flags are considered immutable by
much of our code. Introduce a new mem_flags member to hold these
and make sure checks for these flags being set are either done
under the object lock or with pages properly pinned. The flags
will change during migration under the object lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210624084240.270219-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
We want to remove the changing of ops structure for attaching
phys pages, so we need to kill off HAS_STRUCT_PAGE from ops->flags,
and put it in the bo.
This will remove a potential race of dereferencing the wrong obj->ops
without ww mutex held.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: apply with wiggle]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-8-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
A new fi-cml-dallium CI machine has 8G and apparently plenty free, yet
fails some selftests with ENOMEM. The failures all seem to be from
huge_gem_object which does not try very hard to allocate memory,
skipping reclaim entirely. Let's try a bit harder and direct reclaim
before failing.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210112020013.19464-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
It looks like some callers expect a non-volatile object, that they do not
want the contents of the pages lost if they happen to not be looking at it.
The shrinker however sees that we mark the pages as DONTNEED and
believes that it can freely reap them. However, since the huge object
use plain pages, they cannot be swapped out as they have no backing
storge, and the only way we can shrink them is by discarding the
contents. In light of the callers wanting to keep the contents around,
both IS_SHRINKABLE and marking the pages as volatile are incorrect.
If we drop the IS_SHRINKABLE flag we avoid the immediate issue of the
shrinker accidentally removing valuable content. We will have to
remember that a huge object is not suitable for exercising the shrinker
interaction -- although we can introduce a shrinkable one if we require.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323130821.47914-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Out scatterlist utility routines can be pulled out of i915_gem.h for a
bit more decluttering.
v2: Push I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE out of i915_scatterlist itself and into the
caller.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
