Due to bpf_map_lookup_elem being declared static we need to also
declare subprog_noise as static.
Fixes the following error:
progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c:26:9: error: 'bpf_map_lookup_elem' is static but used in inline function 'subprog_noise' which is not static [-Werror]
26 | bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220826035141.737919-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com
Convert all SEC("classifier*") uses to a new and strict SEC("tc")
section name. In reference_tracking selftests switch from ambiguous
searching by program title (section name) to non-ambiguous searching by
name in some selftests, getting closer to completely removing
bpf_object__find_program_by_title().
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928161946.2512801-4-andrii@kernel.org
This adds some extra noise to the tailcall_bpf2bpf4 tests that will cause
verify to patch insns. This then moves around subprog start/end insn
index and poke descriptor insn index to ensure that verify and JIT will
continue to track these correctly.
If done correctly verifier should pass this program same as before and
JIT should emit tail call logic.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210707223848.14580-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com
In preparation of skipping emitting static variables in BPF skeletons, switch
all current selftests uses of static variables to pass data between BPF and
user-space to use global variables.
All non-read-only `static volatile` variables become just plain global
variables by dropping `static volatile` part.
Read-only `static volatile const` variables, though, still require `volatile`
modifier, otherwise compiler will ignore whatever values are set from
user-space.
Few static linker tests are using name-conflicting static variables to
validate that static linker still properly handles static variables and
doesn't trip up on name conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210507054119.270888-4-andrii@kernel.org
Add four tests to tailcalls selftest explicitly named
"tailcall_bpf2bpf_X" as their purpose is to validate that combination
of tailcalls with bpf2bpf calls are working properly.
These tests also validate LD_ABS from subprograms.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
