PKRU for a task is stored in task->thread.pkru when the task is scheduled
out. For 'current' the authoritative source of PKRU is the hardware.
fpu_reset_fpstate() has two callers:
1) fpu__clear_user_states() for !FPU systems. For those PKRU is irrelevant
2) fpu_flush_thread() which is invoked from flush_thread(). flush_thread()
resets the hardware to the kernel restrictive default value.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.802850233@linutronix.de
switch_to() and flush_thread() write the task's PKRU value eagerly so
the PKRU value of current is always valid in the hardware.
That means there is no point in restoring PKRU on exit to user or when
reactivating the task's FPU registers in the signal frame setup path.
This allows to remove all the xstate buffer updates with PKRU values once
the PKRU state is stored in thread struct while a task is scheduled out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.303919033@linutronix.de
Rename it so it's clear that this is about user ABI features which can
differ from the feature set which the kernel saves and restores because the
kernel handles e.g. PKRU differently. But the user ABI (ptrace, signal
frame) expects it to be there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.211585137@linutronix.de
copy_kernel_to_fpregs() restores all xfeatures but it is also the place
where the AMD FXSAVE_LEAK bug is handled.
That prevents fpregs_restore_userregs() to limit the restored features,
which is required to untangle PKRU and XSTATE handling and also for the
upcoming supervisor state management.
Move the FXSAVE_LEAK quirk into __copy_kernel_to_fpregs() and deinline that
function which has become rather fat.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.114271278@linutronix.de
Rename it so that it becomes entirely clear what this function is
about. It's purpose is to restore the FPU registers to the state which was
saved in the task's FPU memory state either at context switch or by an in
kernel FPU user.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.018867925@linutronix.de
fpu__clear() currently resets both register state and kernel XSAVE buffer
state. It has two modes: one for all state (supervisor and user) and
another for user state only. fpu__clear_all() uses the "all state"
(user_only=0) mode, while a number of signal paths use the user_only=1
mode.
Make fpu__clear() work only for user state (user_only=1) and remove the
"all state" (user_only=0) code. Rename it to match so it can be used by
the signal paths.
Replace the "all state" (user_only=0) fpu__clear() functionality. Use the
TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD functionality instead of making any actual hardware
registers changes in this path.
Instead of invoking fpu__initialize() just memcpy() init_fpstate into the
task's FPU state because that has already the correct format and in case of
PKRU also contains the default PKRU value. Move the actual PKRU write out
into flush_thread() where it belongs and where it will end up anyway when
PKRU and XSTATE have been untangled.
For bisectability a workaround is required which stores the PKRU value in
the xstate memory until PKRU is untangled from XSTATE for context
switching and return to user.
[ Dave Hansen: Polished changelog ]
[ tglx: Fixed the PKRU fallout ]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.922729522@linutronix.de
There is no point in using copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs() which in turn calls
write_pkru(). write_pkru() tries to fiddle with the task's xstate buffer
for nothing because the XRSTOR[S](init_fpstate) just cleared the xfeature
flag in the xstate header which makes get_xsave_addr() fail.
It's a useless exercise anyway because the reinitialization activates the
FPU so before the task's xstate buffer can be used again a XRSTOR[S] must
happen which in turn dumps the PKRU value.
Get rid of the now unused copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.732508792@linutronix.de
X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is enabled first on the boot CPU and the feature flag is
set. Secondary CPUs have to enable CR4.PKE as well and set their per CPU
feature flag. That's ineffective because all call sites have checks for
boot_cpu_data.
Make it smarter and force the feature flag when PKU is enabled on the boot
cpu which allows then to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) all
over the place. That either compiles the code out when PKEY support is
disabled in Kconfig or uses a static_cpu_has() for the feature check which
makes a significant difference in hotpaths, e.g. context switch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.305113644@linutronix.de
Both function names are a misnomer.
fpu__save() is actually about synchronizing the hardware register state
into the task's memory state so that either coredump or a math exception
handler can inspect the state at the time where the problem happens.
The function guarantees to preserve the register state, while "save" is a
common terminology for saving the current state so it can be modified and
restored later. This is clearly not the case here.
Rename it to fpu_sync_fpstate().
fpu__copy() is used to clone the current task's FPU state when duplicating
task_struct. While the register state is a copy the rest of the FPU state
is not.
Name it accordingly and remove the really pointless @src argument along
with the warning which comes along with it.
Nothing can ever copy the FPU state of a non-current task. It's clearly
just a consequence of arch_dup_task_struct(), but it makes no sense to
proliferate that further.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.196727450@linutronix.de
The FNSAVE support requires conditionals in quite some call paths because
FNSAVE reinitializes the FPU hardware. If the save has to preserve the FPU
register state then the caller has to conditionally restore it from memory
when FNSAVE is in use.
This also requires a conditional in context switch because the restore
avoidance optimization cannot work with FNSAVE. As this only affects 20+
years old CPUs there is really no reason to keep this optimization
effective for FNSAVE. It's about time to not optimize for antiques anymore.
Just unconditionally FRSTOR the save content to the registers and clean up
the conditionals all over the place.
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.617369268@linutronix.de
A copy is guaranteed to leave the source intact, which is not the case when
FNSAVE is used as that reinitilizes the registers.
Save does not make such guarantees and it matches what this is about,
i.e. to save the state for a later restore.
Rename it to save_fpregs_to_fpstate().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.508853062@linutronix.de
The function names for fnsave/fnrstor operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_kernel_to_fregs() to frstor()
copy_fregs_to_user() to fnsave_to_user_sigframe()
copy_user_to_fregs() to frstor_from_user_sigframe()
so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low
level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the
documentation is just natural.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.223594101@linutronix.de
The function names for fxsave/fxrstor operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_fxregs_to_kernel() to fxsave()
copy_kernel_to_fxregs() to fxrstor()
copy_fxregs_to_user() to fxsave_to_user_sigframe()
copy_user_to_fxregs() to fxrstor_from_user_sigframe()
so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low
level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the
documentation is just natural.
While at it, replace the static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FXSR) with
use_fxsr() to be consistent with the rest of the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.017863494@linutronix.de
The function names for xsave[s]/xrstor[s] operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_xregs_to_kernel() to os_xsave()
copy_kernel_to_xregs() to os_xrstor()
These are truly low level wrappers around the actual instructions
XSAVE[OPT]/XRSTOR and XSAVES/XRSTORS with the twist that the selection
based on the available CPU features happens with an alternative to avoid
conditionals all over the place and to provide the best performance for hot
paths.
The os_ prefix tells that this is the OS selected mechanism.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.830239347@linutronix.de
The only usecase for fpu__write_begin is the set() callback of regset, so
the function is pointlessly global.
Move it to the regset code and rename it to fpu_force_restore() which is
exactly decribing what the function does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.328652975@linutronix.de
The function can only be used from the regset get() callbacks safely. So
there is no reason to have it globally exposed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.234942936@linutronix.de
They are only used in fpstate_init() and there is no point to have them in
a header just to make reading the code harder.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121452.023118522@linutronix.de
Currently, requesting kernel FPU access doesn't distinguish which parts of
the extended ("FPU") state are needed. This is nice for simplicity, but
there are a few cases in which it's suboptimal:
- The vast majority of in-kernel FPU users want XMM/YMM/ZMM state but do
not use legacy 387 state. These users want MXCSR initialized but don't
care about the FPU control word. Skipping FNINIT would save time.
(Empirically, FNINIT is several times slower than LDMXCSR.)
- Code that wants MMX doesn't want or need MXCSR initialized.
_mmx_memcpy(), for example, can run before CR4.OSFXSR gets set, and
initializing MXCSR will fail because LDMXCSR generates an #UD when the
aforementioned CR4 bit is not set.
- Any future in-kernel users of XFD (eXtended Feature Disable)-capable
dynamic states will need special handling.
Add a more specific API that allows callers to specify exactly what they
want.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Olędzki <ole@ans.pl>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aff1cac8b8fc7ee900cf73e8f2369966621b053f.1611205691.git.luto@kernel.org
When saving xstate to a kernel/user XSAVE area with the XSAVE family of
instructions, the current code applies the 'full' instruction mask (-1),
which tries to XSAVE all possible features. This method relies on
hardware to trim 'all possible' down to what is enabled in the
hardware. The code works well for now. However, there will be a
problem, if some features are enabled in hardware, but are not suitable
to be saved into all kernel XSAVE buffers, like task->fpu, due to
performance consideration.
One such example is the Last Branch Records (LBR) state. The LBR state
only contains valuable information when LBR is explicitly enabled by
the perf subsystem, and the size of an LBR state is large (808 bytes
for now). To avoid both CPU overhead and space overhead at each context
switch, the LBR state should not be saved into task->fpu like other
state components. It should be saved/restored on demand when LBR is
enabled in the perf subsystem. Current copy_xregs_to_* will trigger a
buffer overflow for such cases.
Three sites use the '-1' instruction mask which must be updated.
Two are saving/restoring the xstate to/from a kernel-allocated XSAVE
buffer and can use 'xfeatures_mask_all', which will save/restore all of
the features present in a normal task FPU buffer.
The last one saves the register state directly to a user buffer. It
could
also use 'xfeatures_mask_all'. Just as it was with the '-1' argument,
any supervisor states in the mask will be filtered out by the hardware
and not saved to the buffer. But, to be more explicit about what is
expected to be saved, use xfeatures_mask_user() for the instruction
mask.
KVM includes the header file fpu/internal.h. To avoid 'undefined
xfeatures_mask_all' compiling issue, move copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() to
fpu/core.c and export it, because:
- The xfeatures_mask_all is indirectly used via copy_fpregs_to_fpstate()
by KVM. The function which is directly used by other modules should be
exported.
- The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a function, while xfeatures_mask_all
is a variable for the "internal" FPU state. It's safer to export a
function than a variable, which may be implicitly changed by others.
- The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a big function with many checks. The
removal of the inline keyword should not impact the performance.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1593780569-62993-20-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Previously, kernel floating point code would run with the MXCSR control
register value last set by userland code by the thread that was active
on the CPU core just before kernel call. This could affect calculation
results if rounding mode was changed, or a crash if a FPU/SIMD exception
was unmasked.
Restore MXCSR to the kernel's default value.
[ bp: Carve out from a bigger patch by Petteri, add feature check, add
FNINIT call too (amluto). ]
Signed-off-by: Petteri Aimonen <jpa@git.mail.kapsi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207979
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200624114646.28953-2-bp@alien8.de
Currently, fpu__clear() clears all fpregs and xstates. Once XSAVES
supervisor states are introduced, supervisor settings (e.g. CET xstates)
must remain active for signals; It is necessary to have separate functions:
- Create fpu__clear_user_states(): clear only user settings for signals;
- Create fpu__clear_all(): clear both user and supervisor settings in
flush_thread().
Also modify copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() to take a mask from above two
functions.
Remove obvious side-comment in fpu__clear(), while at it.
[ bp: Make the second argument of fpu__clear() bool after requesting it
a bunch of times during review.
- Add a comment about copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() locking needs. ]
Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512145444.15483-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com
This function is only use by the core FPU code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-4-hch@lst.de
Merge two helpers into the main function, remove a pointless local
variable and flatten a conditional.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-3-hch@lst.de
Remove two little helpers and merge them into kernel_fpu_end() to
streamline the function.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604071524.12835-2-hch@lst.de
current->mm can be non-NULL if a kthread calls use_mm(). Check for
PF_KTHREAD instead to decide when to store user mode FP state.
Fixes: 2722146eb7 ("x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized")
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604175411.GA27477@lst.de
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:
- Have no license information of any form
- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
initial scan/conversion to ignore the file
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Defer loading of FPU state until return to userspace. This gives
the kernel the potential to skip loading FPU state for tasks that
stay in kernel mode, or for tasks that end up with repeated
invocations of kernel_fpu_begin() & kernel_fpu_end().
The fpregs_lock/unlock() section ensures that the registers remain
unchanged. Otherwise a context switch or a bottom half could save the
registers to its FPU context and the processor's FPU registers would
became random if modified at the same time.
KVM swaps the host/guest registers on entry/exit path. This flow has
been kept as is. First it ensures that the registers are loaded and then
saves the current (host) state before it loads the guest's registers. The
swap is done at the very end with disabled interrupts so it should not
change anymore before theg guest is entered. The read/save version seems
to be cheaper compared to memcpy() in a micro benchmark.
Each thread gets TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD set as part of fork() / fpu__copy().
For kernel threads, this flag gets never cleared which avoids saving /
restoring the FPU state for kernel threads and during in-kernel usage of
the FPU registers.
[
bp: Correct and update commit message and fix checkpatch warnings.
s/register/registers/ where it is used in plural.
minor comment corrections.
remove unused trace_x86_fpu_activate_state() TP.
]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-24-bigeasy@linutronix.de
user_fpu_begin() sets fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx to task's fpu struct. This is
always the case since there is no lazy FPU anymore.
fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx is used during context switch to decide if it needs
to load the saved registers or if the currently loaded registers are
valid. It could be skipped during a
taskA -> kernel thread -> taskA
switch because the switch to the kernel thread would not alter the CPU's
sFPU tate.
Since this field is always updated during context switch and
never invalidated, setting it manually (in user context) makes no
difference. A kernel thread with kernel_fpu_begin() block could
set fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx to NULL but a kernel thread does not use
user_fpu_begin().
This is a leftover from the lazy-FPU time.
Remove user_fpu_begin(), it does not change fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx's
content.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The struct fpu.initialized member is always set to one for user tasks
and zero for kernel tasks. This avoids saving/restoring the FPU
registers for kernel threads.
The ->initialized = 0 case for user tasks has been removed in previous
changes, for instance, by doing an explicit unconditional init at fork()
time for FPU-less systems which was otherwise delayed until the emulated
opcode.
The context switch code (switch_fpu_prepare() + switch_fpu_finish())
can't unconditionally save/restore registers for kernel threads. Not
only would it slow down the switch but also load a zeroed xcomp_bv for
XSAVES.
For kernel_fpu_begin() (+end) the situation is similar: EFI with runtime
services uses this before alternatives_patched is true. Which means that
this function is used too early and it wasn't the case before.
For those two cases, use current->mm to distinguish between user and
kernel thread. For kernel_fpu_begin() skip save/restore of the FPU
registers.
During the context switch into a kernel thread don't do anything. There
is no reason to save the FPU state of a kernel thread.
The reordering in __switch_to() is important because the current()
pointer needs to be valid before switch_fpu_finish() is invoked so ->mm
is seen of the new task instead the old one.
N.B.: fpu__save() doesn't need to check ->mm because it is called by
user tasks only.
[ bp: Massage. ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de
fpu__clear() only initializes the state if the CPU has FPU support.
This initialisation is also required for FPU-less systems and takes
place in math_emulate(). Since fpu__initialize() only performs the
initialization if ->initialized is zero it does not matter that it
is invoked each time an opcode is emulated. It makes the removal of
->initialized easier if the struct is also initialized in the FPU-less
case at the same time.
Move fpu__initialize() before the FPU feature check so it is also
performed in the FPU-less case too.
[ bp: Massage a bit. ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Bill Metzenthen <billm@melbpc.org.au>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The preempt_disable() section was introduced in commit
a10b6a16cd ("x86/fpu: Make the fpu state change in fpu__clear() scheduler-atomic")
and it was said to be temporary.
fpu__initialize() initializes the FPU struct to its initial value and
then sets ->initialized to 1. The last part is the important one.
The content of the state does not matter because it gets set via
copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs().
A preemption here has little meaning because the registers will always be
set to the same content after copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(). A softirq
with a kernel_fpu_begin() could also force to save FPU's registers after
fpu__initialize() without changing the outcome here.
Remove the preempt_disable() section in fpu__clear(), preemption here
does not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
There are no users of fpu__restore() so it is time to remove it. The
comment regarding fpu__restore() and TS bit is stale since commit
b3b0870ef3 ("i387: do not preload FPU state at task switch time")
and has no meaning since.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
There is one user of __kernel_fpu_begin() and before invoking it,
it invokes preempt_disable(). So it could invoke kernel_fpu_begin()
right away. The 32bit version of arch_efi_call_virt_setup() and
arch_efi_call_virt_teardown() does this already.
The comment above *kernel_fpu*() claims that before invoking
__kernel_fpu_begin() preemption should be disabled and that KVM is a
good example of doing it. Well, KVM doesn't do that since commit
f775b13eed ("x86,kvm: move qemu/guest FPU switching out to vcpu_run")
so it is not an example anymore.
With EFI gone as the last user of __kernel_fpu_{begin|end}(), both can
be made static and not exported anymore.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181129150210.2k4mawt37ow6c2vq@linutronix.de
The next patch in this series will have to make the definition of
irq_cpustat_t available to entering_irq().
Inclusion of asm/hardirq.h into asm/apic.h would cause circular header
dependencies like
asm/smp.h
asm/apic.h
asm/hardirq.h
linux/irq.h
linux/topology.h
linux/smp.h
asm/smp.h
or
linux/gfp.h
linux/mmzone.h
asm/mmzone.h
asm/mmzone_64.h
asm/smp.h
asm/apic.h
asm/hardirq.h
linux/irq.h
linux/irqdesc.h
linux/kobject.h
linux/sysfs.h
linux/kernfs.h
linux/idr.h
linux/gfp.h
and others.
This causes compilation errors because of the header guards becoming
effective in the second inclusion: symbols/macros that had been defined
before wouldn't be available to intermediate headers in the #include chain
anymore.
A possible workaround would be to move the definition of irq_cpustat_t
into its own header and include that from both, asm/hardirq.h and
asm/apic.h.
However, this wouldn't solve the real problem, namely asm/harirq.h
unnecessarily pulling in all the linux/irq.h cruft: nothing in
asm/hardirq.h itself requires it. Also, note that there are some other
archs, like e.g. arm64, which don't have that #include in their
asm/hardirq.h.
Remove the linux/irq.h #include from x86' asm/hardirq.h.
Fix resulting compilation errors by adding appropriate #includes to *.c
files as needed.
Note that some of these *.c files could be cleaned up a bit wrt. to their
set of #includes, but that should better be done from separate patches, if
at all.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
As per the new nomenclature we don't 'activate' the FPU state
anymore, we initialize it. So drop the _activate_fpstate name
from these functions, which were a bit of a mouthful anyway,
and name them:
fpu__prepare_read()
fpu__prepare_write()
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Rename this function to better express that it's all about
initializing the FPU state of a task which goes hand in hand
with the fpu::initialized field.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-33-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
fpu__copy() has a preempt_disable()/enable() pair, which it had to do to
be able to atomically unlazy the current task when doing an FNSAVE.
But we don't unlazy tasks anymore, we always do direct saves/restores of
FPU context.
So remove both the unnecessary critical section, and update the comments.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-32-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
We don't do any lazy restore anymore, what we have are two pieces of optimization:
- no-FPU tasks that don't save/restore the FPU context (kernel threads are such)
- cached FPU registers maintained via the fpu->last_cpu field. This means that
if an FPU task context switches to a non-FPU task then we can maintain the
FPU registers as an in-FPU copies (cache), and skip the restoration of them
once we switch back to the original FPU-using task.
Update all the comments that still referred to old 'lazy' and 'unlazy' concepts.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-31-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The x86 FPU code used to have a complex state machine where both the FPU
registers and the FPU state context could be 'active' (or inactive)
independently of each other - which enabled features like lazy FPU restore.
Much of this complexity is gone in the current code: now we basically can
have FPU-less tasks (kernel threads) that don't use (and save/restore) FPU
state at all, plus full FPU users that save/restore directly with no laziness
whatsoever.
But the fpu::fpstate_active still carries bits of the old complexity - meanwhile
this flag has become a simple flag that shows whether the FPU context saving
area in the thread struct is initialized and used, or not.
Rename it to fpu::initialized to express this simplicity in the name as well.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-30-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
fpu__activate_fpstate_read() can be called for the current task
when coredumping - or for stopped tasks when ptrace-ing.
Implement this properly in the code and update the comments.
This also fixes an incorrect (but harmless) warning introduced by
one of the earlier patches.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-28-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The previous changes paved the way for the removal of the
fpu::fpregs_active state flag - we now only have the
fpu::fpstate_active and fpu::last_cpu fields left.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-21-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() are currently called in such a pattern:
if (!fpu->fpregs_active)
fpregs_activate(fpu);
...
if (fpu->fpregs_active)
fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
But note that it's actually safe to call them without checking the flag first.
This further decouples the fpu->fpregs_active flag from actual FPU logic.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-20-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
We want to simplify the FPU state machine by eliminating fpu->fpregs_active,
and we can do that because the two state flags (::fpregs_active and
::fpstate_active) are set essentially together.
The old lazy FPU switching code used to make a distinction - but there's
no lazy switching code anymore, we always switch in an 'eager' fashion.
Do this by first changing all substantial uses of fpu->fpregs_active
to fpu->fpstate_active and adding a few debug checks to double check
our assumption is correct.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-19-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Prepare fpu__drop() to use fpu->fpregs_active.
There are two distinct usecases for fpu__drop() in this context:
exit_thread() when called for 'current' in exit(), and when called
for another task in fork().
This patch does not change behavior, it only adds a couple of
debug checks and structures the code to make the ->fpregs_active
change more obviously correct.
All the complications will be removed later on.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-18-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Do this temporarily only, to make it easier to change the FPU state machine,
in particular this change couples the fpu->fpregs_active and fpu->fpstate_active
states: they are only set/cleared together (as far as the scheduler sees them).
This will be removed by later patches.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-17-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
