If we run the following perf command in an AMD Milan guest:
perf stat \
-e cpu/event=0x1d0/ \
-e cpu/event=0x1c7/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x1f,event=0x18e/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x7,event=0x18e/ \
-e cpu/umask=0x18,event=0x18e/ \
./workload
dmesg will report a #GP warning from an unchecked MSR access
error on MSR_F15H_PERF_CTLx.
This is because according to APM (Revision: 4.03) Figure 13-7,
the bits [35:32] of AMD PerfEvtSeln register is a part of the
event select encoding, which extends the EVENT_SELECT field
from 8 bits to 12 bits.
Opportunistically update pmu->reserved_bits for reserved bit 19.
Reported-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Fixes: ca724305a2 ("KVM: x86/vPMU: Implement AMD vPMU code for KVM")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20211118130320.95997-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
These function names sound like predicates, and they have siblings,
*is_valid_msr(), which _are_ predicates. Moreover, there are comments
that essentially warn that these functions behave unexpectedly.
Flip the polarity of the return values, so that they become
predicates, and convert the boolean result to a success/failure code
at the outer call site.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20211105202058.1048757-1-jmattson@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0-5, MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0-5 MSRs are only available when
X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE CPUID bit was exposed to the guest. KVM, however,
allows these MSRs unconditionally because kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr() ->
amd_msr_idx_to_pmc() check always passes and because kvm_pmu_set_msr() ->
amd_pmu_set_msr() doesn't fail.
In case of a counter (CTRn), no big harm is done as we only increase
internal PMC's value but in case of an eventsel (CTLn), we go deep into
perf internals with a non-existing counter.
Note, kvm_get_msr_common() just returns '0' when these MSRs don't exist
and this also seems to contradict architectural behavior which is #GP
(I did check one old Opteron host) but changing this status quo is a bit
scarier.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210323084515.1346540-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Change kvm_pmu_get_msr() to get the msr_data struct, as the host_initiated
field from the struct could be used by get_msr. This also makes this API
consistent with kvm_pmu_set_msr. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200529074347.124619-2-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Move svm.c and pmu_amd.c into their own arch/x86/kvm/svm/
subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Message-Id: <20200324094154.32352-2-joro@8bytes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
