We really only need memcpy restore for objects that affect the
operability of the migrate context. That is, primarily the page-table
objects of the migrate VM.
Add an object flag, I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY for objects that need early
restores using memcpy and a way to assign LMEM page-table object flags
to be used by the vms.
Restore objects without this flag with the gpu blitter and only objects
carrying the flag using TTM memcpy.
Initially mark the migrate, gt, gtt and vgpu vms to use this flag, and
defer for a later audit which vms actually need it. Most importantly, user-
allocated vms with pinned page-table objects can be restored using the
blitter.
Performance-wise memcpy restore is probably as fast as gpu restore if not
faster, but using gpu restore will help tackling future restrictions in
mappable LMEM size.
v4:
- Don't mark the aliasing ppgtt page table flags for early resume, but
rather the ggtt page table flags as intended. (Matthew Auld)
- The check for user buffer objects during early resume is pointless, since
they are never marked I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY. (Matthew Auld)
v5:
- Mark GuC LMEM objects with I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY to have them restored
before we fire up the migrate context.
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922062527.865433-8-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Add support for DPT (display page table). DPT is a
slightly peculiar two level page table scheme used for
tiled scanout buffers (linear uses direct ggtt mapping
still). The plane surface address will point at a page
in the DPT which holds the PTEs for 512 actual pages.
Thus we require 1/512 of the ggttt address space
compared to a direct ggtt mapping.
We create a new DPT address space for each framebuffer and
track two vmas (one for the DPT, another for the ggtt).
TODO:
- Is the i915_address_space approaach sane?
- Maybe don't map the whole DPT to write the PTEs?
- Deal with remapping/rotation? Need to create a
separate DPT for each remapped/rotated plane I
guess. Or else we'd need to make the per-fb DPT
large enough to support potentially several
remapped/rotated vmas. How large should that be?
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Cc: Wilson Chris P <Chris.P.Wilson@intel.com>
Cc: Tang CQ <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Auld Matthew <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilson Chris P <Chris.P.Wilson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210506161930.309688-5-imre.deak@intel.com
Attempt to split i915_gem_gtt.[ch] into more manageable chunks.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200107134009.3255354-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
