[why]:
issues fixed:
- comparison with wider integer type in loop condition which can cause
infinite loops
- pointer dereference before null check
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Josip Pavic <josip.pavic@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sohaib Nadeem <sohaib.nadeem@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Some of the CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_FP was added in some non-related FPU code,
which may cause confusion. This commit dropped some of the unnecessary
guards.
Acked-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
When usb4 bandwidth allocation mode is enabled, driver need to request
bandwidth from connection manager. For mst link, the requested
bandwidth should be big enough for all remote streams.
[HOW]
- If mst link, the requested bandwidth should be the sum of all mst
streams bandwidth added with dp MTPH overhead.
- Allocate/deallcate usb4 bandwidth when setting dpms on/off.
- When doing display mode validation, driver also need to consider total
bandwidth of all mst streams for mst link.
Reviewed-by: Cruise Hung <cruise.hung@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peichen Huang <peichen.huang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
There certain cases where the timing BW is dependent on the type of link
encoding in use. Thus to calculate the correct BW required for a given
timing, the link encoding should be added as a parameter.
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <haoping.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: George Shen <george.shen@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use dpia_validate_usb4_bw() function
Fixes: a8b537605e ("drm/amd/display: Add function pointer for validate bw usb4")
Reviewed-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Meenakshikumar Somasundaram <meenakshikumar.somasundaram@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mustapha Ghaddar <mghaddar@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
In order to follow the new protocol of calling link functions
[HOW]
Add the function pointer to the link_srv
Reviewed-by: Kshitij Bhardwaj <kshitij.bhardwaj1@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mustapha Ghaddar <mghaddar@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The function link_timing_bandwidth_kbps is defined in the
link_validation.c file, but not called elsewhere, so remove this unused
function.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/link_validation.c:258:10: warning: no previous prototype for ‘link_timing_bandwidth_kbps’.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=4547
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
All dc subcomponents should call another dc component via function pointers
stored in a component structure. This is part of dc coding convention since
the beginning. The reason behind this is to improve encapsulation and
polymorphism. The function contract is extracted into a single link service
structure defined in link.h header file and implemented only in link_factory.c instead
of spreading across multiple files in link component file structure.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
The only reason we have the DCN config is for
floating point support. Rename it to make that
clear and (hopefully) avoid misuse of the config
in the future.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
DC is littered with many DCN guards that are not needed.
Drop them.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Link components should not reply on dc_link_exports to access link function in
other link components.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Link is a subcomponent in dc. DM should be aware of dc link structure
as one of the abstracted objects maintained by dc. However it should
have no idea of the existence of a link component in dc dedicated to
maintain the states of dc link structure. As such we are moving link interfaces
out of dc_link.h and directly added to dc.h. We are grandually fading out
the explicit inclusion of dc_link header and eventually delete it.
On dc side, since link is a subcomponent behind dc interfaces, it is not
a good idea to implement dc interfaces in each individual subcomponent
of link which is already a subcomponent of dc. So we are decoupling it
by implementing a dc_link_exports in dc. This file will be a thin
translation layer that breaks the dependency so link is able to make
interface changes without breaking DM.
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN is disabled, the is_frl member
is not defined:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/link_validation.c: In function 'dp_active_dongle_validate_timing':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/link/link_validation.c:126:66: error: 'const struct dc_dsc_config' has no member named 'is_frl'
126 | if (timing->flags.DSC && !timing->dsc_cfg.is_frl)
| ^
Use the same #ifdef as the other references to this.
Fixes: 54618888d1 ("drm/amd/display: break down dc_link.c")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
dc_link contains over 30k line of code, the decision is to break it
down to files residing in link folder based on functionality. This
change is the last break down change which will remove dc_link.c
file after everything is broken down.
[how]
Move remaining dc_link.c functions into link_detection, link_dpms,
link_validation, link_resource, and link_fpga and remove dc_link.
Reviewed-by: George Shen <George.Shen@amd.com>
Acked-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
