Enabling atomic operations in L3 leads to unrecoverable GPU hangs, as
the machine stops responding milliseconds after receipt of the reset
request [GDRT]. By disabling the cached atomics, the hang do not occur
and we presume the GPU would reset normally for similar hangs.
Sadly this is a shotgun approach, but since the impact is critical it is
better to err on the safe side and work back from there.
Reported-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110998
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlesktrand.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210125220152.24070-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
(cherry picked from commit b267c7ae0ad5b437b068f46919b17f85000154b4)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915//gt/intel_workarounds.c:1394:20: error: function 'is_nonpriv_flags_valid' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
static inline bool is_nonpriv_flags_valid(u32 flags)
This is only used by debug build, so mark it as maybe-unused to keep the
compiler from complaining.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210109163455.28466-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Let's modify the "workaround lost" error message slightly to make it
more clear what the various numbers represent. Also, the 'expected'
value needs to be &'d with wa->read so that it doesn't include the mask
bits for masked registers (those bits are write-only in the hardware and
will usually always read out as 0's).
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201231191103.854519-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Primarily used by selftests, but also by runtime debugging of engine
w/a, is a routine to create a temporarily bound buffer for readback.
Almagamate the duplicated routines into one.
Suggested-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201219020343.22681-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The above workaround was added as an engine workaround not a GT
workaround. Moved it to the correct location.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201210170615.3107266-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Document what a masked register is according to bspec so we avoid
developers using the wrong functions to implement WAs.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The use of "masked" in this function is due to its history. Once upon a
time it received a mask and a value as parameter. Since
commit eeec73f8a4 ("drm/i915/gt: Skip rmw for masked registers")
that is not true anymore and now there is a clear and a set parameter.
Depending on the case, that can still be thought as a mask and value,
but there are some subtle differences: what we clear doesn't need to be
the same bits we are setting, particularly when we are using masked
registers.
The fact that we also have "masked registers", i.e. registers whose mask
is stored in the upper 16 bits of the register, makes it even more
confusing, because "masked" in wa_write_masked_or() has little to do
with masked registers, but rather refers to the old mask parameter the
function received (that can also, but not exclusively, be used to write
to masked register).
Avoid the ambiguity and misnomer by renaming it to something else,
hopefully less confusing: wa_write_clr_set(), to designate that we are
doing both clr and set operations in the register.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
When using masked registers, there is nothing to clear since a masked
register has the mask in the upper 16b: we can just write to the
location we want and use the mask to control what bits we are writing
to.
However that doesn't mean we don't want to read back the register and
check the value actually matched what we wanted to write, i.e. that
the WA stick. That should be an explicit opt-out for registers that are
either write-only or that are affected by hardware misbehavior.
Moreover both wa_masked_en() and wa_masked_dis() check the WA stick, so
skipping the check just because the field is more than 1 bit is
surprising and error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Remove the last macro and implement it as a function like the rest of
the operations that don't assume there is a `wal` list, but rather
receive it as argument.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201205092542.2325477-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Just ommitting the list it's operating on doesn't save much typing
and adds another way to do the same thing. Just replace it with
wa_masked_dis().
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201205092542.2325477-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Just ommitting the list it's operating on doesn't save much typing and
adds another way to do the same thing. Just replace it with
wa_masked_en().
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201205092542.2325477-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Set GS Timer to 224 to prevent a HS/DS hang.
Bspec: 53508
v2: reword commit message and add comment explaining why read
verification is ignored (Chris)
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201205092542.2325477-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Just like for rkl and tgl, this should be permanent as well for dg1
instead just for A0. The commit making it permanent for those platforms
ended up "racing" with the commit adding the DG1 WAs, so now fix that up.
v2: Add "tgl,dg1" to WA comment (Matt)
Cc: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201027043228.696518-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
I forgot to free the old list when growing past 16 entries.
Luckily, as much as I checked, none of the current platforms has more than
16 workarounds on a single list.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 452420d22d ("drm/i915: Fuse per-context workaround handling with the common framework")
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201113132510.2298483-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
DG1 shares some workarounds with TGL and RKL and also has some
additional workarounds of its own.
v2: Correct location of Wa_1408615072 (JohnH).
v3: Apply WAs 1606700617, 18011464164 and 22010931296 to DG1 (José)
v4 (Anusha)
- Add Wa_22010271021
- s/Wa_14010096844/Wa_1409836686
v5:
- Extend Wa_14010919138 to all revs (Matt Atwood)
- Power gate media is global gen12 design. (Rodrigo)
- Rebase (Lucas)
v6: use REG_BIT() to fix checkpatch warning (Lucas)
BSpec: 53508
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201014191937.1266226-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Recently we came across requirement to identify EHL and JSL
platform to program them differently. Thus Split the basic
platform definition, macros, and PCI IDs to differentiate
between EHL and JSL platforms. Also, IS_ELKHARTLAKE is replaced
with IS_JSL_EHL everywhere.
Changes since V1 :
- Rebased to avoid merge conflicts
- Added missed check for jasperlake in intel_uc_fw.c
Cc : Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc : Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201013192948.63470-1-tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com
The updated bspec forcewake table also provides us with new multicast
ranges that should be reflected in our workaround code.
Note that there are different types of multicast registers with
different styles of replication and different steering registers. The
i915 MCR range lists we're updating here are only used to ensure we can
verify workarounds properly (i.e., if we can't steer register reads we
don't want to verify workarounds where an unsteered read might hit a
fused-off instance of the unit). Because of this, we don't need to
include any of the multicast ranges where all instances of the register
will always present and fusing doesn't play a role. Specifically, that
means that we are not including the MCR ranges designated as "SQIDI" in
the bspec.
Bspec: 66696
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009194442.3668677-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Instead of using intel_context_create_request(), use intel_context_pin()
and i915_create_request directly.
Now all those calls are gone outside of selftests. :)
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200819140904.1708856-17-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Enable HW Default flip for small PL.
bspec: 52890
bspec: 53508
bspec: 53273
v2: rebase to drm-tip
v3: move from ctx to gt workarounds. Remove whitelist.
v4: move to rcs WA init
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200826025724.20944-1-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com
We usually assume that increasing PCI device revision ID's translates to
newer steppings; macros like IS_KBL_REVID() that we use rely on this
behavior. Unfortunately this turns out to not be true on KBL; the
newer device 2 revision ID's sometimes go backward to older steppings.
The situation is further complicated by different GT and display
steppings associated with each revision ID.
Let's work around this by providing a table to map the revision ID to
specific GT and display steppings, and then perform our comparisons on
the mapped values.
v2:
- Move the kbl_revids[] array to intel_workarounds.c to avoid compiler
warnings about an unused variable in files that don't call the
macros (kernel test robot).
Bspec: 18329
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200811032105.2819370-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
RKL and TGL share some general gen12 workarounds, but each platform also
has its own platform-specific workarounds.
v2:
- Add Wa_1604555607 for RKL. This makes RKL's ctx WA list identical to
TGL's, so we'll have both functions call the tgl_ function for now;
this workaround isn't listed for DG1 so we don't want to add it to
the general gen12_ function.
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716220551.2730644-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
As today those 2 WAs have different implementation between TGL and DG1
WA pages but checking the HSD it is clear that DG1 implementation
should be used for both, also to do so is easier as we just need to
extend WA 1407928979 to B* stepping.
Both WAs are need to fix some possible render corruptions.
DG1 initial patches were not merged yet, as soon it is this WAs should
be applied to DG1 as well.
BSpec: 53508
BSpec: 52890
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708212947.40178-1-jose.souza@intel.com
SSEUs are a GT capability, so track them under gt_info.
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200708003952.21831-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Set GS Timer to 224. Combine with Wa_1604555607 due to register FF_MODE2
not being able to be read.
V2: Math issue fixed
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200603221150.14745-1-clinton.a.taylor@intel.com
We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request,
so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes
from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer
chasing in using rq->engine->i915?
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
For reasons that be, the HW only allows usersace to read its own
CTX_TIMESTAMP [context local HW runtime] on rcs. Make it available for
all by adding it to the whitelists.
v2: The change took effect from Cometlake.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602154839.6902-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cometlake is a small refresh of Coffeelake, but since we have found out a
difference in the plaforms, we need to identify them as separate platforms.
Since we previously took Coffeelake/Cometlake as identical, update all
IS_COFFEELAKE() to also include IS_COMETLAKE().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602140541.5481-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Remove all the stepping dependent cnl workarounds. Bspec lists
more steppings than this so presumably these are classed as
pre-production. And this is cnl after all so no one should
really care anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200430125822.21985-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Even though the bspec is missing gen12 register details for the MCR
selector register (0xFDC), this is confirmed by hardware folks to be a
mistake; the register does exist and we do indeed need to steer
multicast register reads to an appropriate instance the same as we did
on gen11.
Note that despite the lack of documentation we were still using the MCR
selector to read INSTDONE and such in read_subslice_reg() too.
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200414211118.2787489-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
This workaround now applies to all steppings, not just A0.
Wa_1409085225 is a temporary A0-only W/A however it is
identical to Wa_14010229206 and hence the combined workaround
is made permanent.
Bspec: 52890
Signed-off-by: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Tested-by: Rafael Antognolli <rafael.antognolli@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
[mattrope: added missing blank line]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326234955.16155-1-swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com
