As it now it is always required for GEN12+ the is_16gb_dimm name
do not make sense for GEN12+.
v2:
- Updated comment on top of "dram_info->wm_lv_0_adjust_needed =
!IS_GEN9_LP(i915);"
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210128164312.91160-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Up to now we were reading some DRAM information from MCHBAR register
and from pcode what is already not good but some GEN12(TGL-H and ADL-S)
platforms have MCHBAR DRAM information in different offsets.
This was notified to HW team that decided that the best alternative is
always apply the 16gb_dimm watermark adjustment for GEN12+ platforms
and read the remaning DRAM information needed to other display
programming from pcode.
So here moving the DRAM pcode function to intel_dram.c, removing
the duplicated fields from intel_qgv_info, setting and using
information from dram_info.
v2:
- bring back num_points to intel_qgv_info as num_qgv_point can be
overwritten in icl_get_qgv_points()
- add gen12_get_dram_info() and simplify gen11_get_dram_info()
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210128164312.91160-2-jose.souza@intel.com
CNL+ can report DIMM sizes in .5 GB units. In order to not trauncate
away the .5 GB let's switch to storing the DIMM size in Gb units.
Cc: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200929131312.12999-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Finish the job started in d28ae3b281 ("drm/i915: split out
intel_dram.[ch] from i915_drv.c") by moving struct dram_dimm_info and
dram_channel_info inside intel_dram.c, the only user of the structs.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227145359.17543-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain
point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(),
POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW().
Replace them with the corresponding uncore register accessors
intel_uncore_read(), intel_uncore_write(), intel_uncore_posting_read(),
intel_uncore_read_fw(), and intel_uncore_write_fw().
Rename dev_priv to i915 while at it.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200225111509.21879-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
The DRAM related routines are pretty isolated from the rest of the
i915_drv.c, split it out to a separate file. Put the eDRAM stuff in the
same bag, and rename the visible functions to have intel_dram_
prefix. Do some benign whitespace fixes and dev_priv -> i915 conversions
while at it.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200225111509.21879-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
