Selective update doesn't work if SU start address is 0 and start/end
SDP is configured to be sent prior to SU start/end lines. PSR2 has to be
disabled in this case for Alder Lake.
HSDES: 22012279113
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Equation for sending start/end SDP prior to the SU region start/end
has changed. Update used formula.
Bspec: 49274
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
The issue here was on for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
new_crtc_state encoder mask, so if the CRTC was being disabled mask
would be zero and it would not have any chance to disable PSR.
So here doing for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
old_crtc_state encoder mask and then using the new_crtc_state to
check if PSR needs to be disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This patches fixes a issue but not in the right way as
for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state() will interate over all CRTCs
not only the crtc passed as parameter, also this two for_each loops
are not necessary and only make code harder to understand.
Proper fix will be discussed in the next patch.
This reverts commit 75f664903d.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently PSR is left enabled when all planes are disabled if there
is no attached encoder in new state. This seems to be causing FIFO
underruns.
Fix this by checking if encoder exists in new crtc state and disable
PSR if it doesn't.
v2: Unify disable logic with existing
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reported-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711111750.881552-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Commit 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs.
global parts") cause PSR to be disabled when enable_psr has the
default value and there is at least one DP port that do not supports
PSR.
That was happening because intel_psr_init() is called for every DP
port and then enable_psr is globaly set to 0 based on the PSR support
of the DP port.
Here dropping the enable_psr overwritten and using the VBT PSR value
when enable_psr is set as default.
Fixes: 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220608203344.513082-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Current update area calculation is not handling situation where
e.g. cursor plane is fully or partially outside pipe area.
Fix this by checking damage area against pipe_src area using
drm_rect_intersect.
v2: Set x1 and x2 in damaged_area initialization
v3: Move drm_rect_intersect into clip_area_update
v4: draw_area -> pipe_src
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5440
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we have some corner cases where area calculation fails. For
these sel fetch area calculation ends up having update area as y1 = 0,
y2 = 4. Instead of these values safer option is full update.
One of such for example is big fb with offset. We don't have usable
offset in psr2_sel_fetch_update. Currently it's open what is the
proper way to fix this corner case. Use full update for now.
v2: Commit message modified
v3: Print out debug info once when area calculation fails
v4: Use drm_info_once
v5: pipeA -> "pipe %c", pipe_name(crtc-pipe)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
After commit 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full
frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") was merged we started to
get some drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(tmp & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE))
in tests that are executed in pipe B.
This is probably due psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled being left set during
PSR disable in the pipe A, so the PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL write in
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() is skipped in pipe B and then
we get the warning when actually enabling PSR after planes programing.
We don't get such warnings when running tests in pipe A because
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is only cleared when enabling PSR2 with hardware
tracking.
Was not able to reproduce this issue but cleaning the PSR state
disable will not harm anything at all.
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5634
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-2-jose.souza@intel.com
If any of the PSR2 checks after intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
fails, enable_psr2_sel_fetch will be kept enabled causing problems
in the functions that only checks for it and not for has_psr2.
So here moving the check that do not depend on enable_psr2_sel_fetch
and for the remaning ones jumping to a section that unset
enable_psr2_sel_fetch in case of failure to support PSR2.
Fixes: 6e43e276b8 ("drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2 selective fetch")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can
enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full frame, that will keep
the panel updated like PSR was disabled but without keeping PSR active.
So as soon as the frontbuffer flush happens we can disable the
continuous full frame and start to do selective fetches much quicker
than the path that would enable PSR, that will wait a few frames
to actually activate PSR.
Also this approach has proven to fix some glitches found in Alderlake-P
when there are a lot of invalidations happening together with page
flips.
Some may ask why it is writing to CURSURFLIVE(), it is because
that is the way that hardware team provided us to poke display to
handle PSR updates, and it is being used since display 9.
v2:
- handling possible race conditions between frontbuffer rendering and
page flips
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Shawn C Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other
and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.
And because pipe/crtc updates are time sentive we can't grab the
PSR lock after intel_pipe_update_start() and before
intel_pipe_update_end().
So here adding the lock and unlock functions and calls, the
proper PSR2 selective fetch handling will come in a separated patch.
v2:
- fixed new functions documentation
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Following up what was done in commit 804f468853 ("drm/i915/psr: Set
"SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update") and also setting
partial frame enable when psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() is called.
Also as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is a double buffered registers do a RMW
is not a good idea so here also setting the man_trk_ctl_enable_bit()
that is required in TGL and only doing a register write.
v2:
- not doing a rmw
v3:
- removing the inline from functions that return PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL
bits
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-1-jose.souza@intel.com
If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be disabled
for good but that is not happening.
It would be disabled by the function handling the PSR error but then
on the next fastset it would be enabled again in
_intel_psr_post_plane_update().
It would only be disabled for good in the next modeset where has_psr
will be set false.
v2:
- release psr lock before continue
Fixes: 9ce5884e51 ("drm/i915/display: Only keep PSR enabled if there is active planes")
Reported-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Reported-by: Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or
issues that were root caused to panel firmware bugs, to make life of
those users easier here adding a option to disable PSR2 with kernel
parameters so they can still benefit from PSR1 power savings.
Using the same enable_psr that is current used to turn the whole
feature on or off and allowing user to select up to what PSR version
it should enable.
Right now users only set this parameter to 0 when they want to disable
PSR1 and PSR2 or don't add it at all leaving it to per-chip behavior
so it should not cause a bad impact on users.
v2:
- changing enable_psr values (Ville and Rodrigo)
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4951
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220224202523.993560-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasional screen flickering when
PSR2 selective fetch is enabled. More specifically glitch seems
to happen on full frame update when cursor moves to coords
x = -1 or y = -1.
According to Bspec SF Single full frame should not be set if
SF Partial Frame Enable is not set. This happened to be true for
ADLP as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE is always set and for ADL_P it's
actually "SF Partial Frame Enable" (Bit 31).
Setting "SF Partial Frame Enable" bit also on full update seems to
fix screen flickering.
Also make code more clear by setting PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE
only if not on ADL_P. Bit 31 has different meaning in ADL_P.
Bspec: 49274
v2: Fix Mihai Harpau email address
v3: Modify commit message and remove unnecessary comment
Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 7f6002e580 ("drm/i915/display: Enable PSR2 selective fetch by default")
Reported-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mihai Harpau <mharpau@gmail.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5077
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225070228.855138-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Grouping inside of the same if all the programing sequences and
workarounds of PSR2.
The order of programing changed in intel_psr_enable_source() but
it will not affect PSR2 as at this point PSR2_ENABLE is still disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220210185223.95399-1-jose.souza@intel.com
When a plane with a multiplanar format is added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(), only the UV plane is
added, so a intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state() call to get the Y
plane state can return a null pointer.
To fix this, intel_atomic_get_plane_state() should be called and
the return needs to be checked for errors, as it could return a EAGAIN
as other atomic state could be holding the lock for the Y plane.
Other issue with the patch being fixed is that the Y plane is not
being committed to hardware because the corresponded plane bit is not
set in update_planes when UV and Y planes are added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes().
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 3809991ff5 ("drm/i915/display: Add initial selective fetch support for biplanar formats")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108213807.39865-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This reverts commit 1f61f0655b.
Now we are supporting selective fetch for biplanar formats.
We can revert WA patch which forced using full fetch for biplanar
formats.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Biplanar formats are using two planes (Y and UV). This patch adds handling
of Y selective fetch area by utilizing existing linked plane mechanism.
Also UV plane Y offset configuration is modified according to Bspec.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
PSR2 is supported in transcoder A and B on Alderlake-P.
v2:
- explicity checking for transcoder A and B to avoid invalid transcoder
BSpec: 49185
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> # v2
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027180545.55660-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 apparently requires some planes to be enabled for some
silly reason, and so we are now trying to turn PSR off before
planes go off. Except during a full modeset that is handled
less clearly through reorganization of the modeset sequence.
That is not great as it makes the code mode complex, and
prevents us from doing nice things such as just turning off
all the planes at the very start of the modeset. So let's
move the PSR pre_plane_update() thing to a spot where it
will handle both full modesets and everything else.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211022103304.24164-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2
is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a
period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US.
For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle() was
implemented to wait for PSR1 to get into idle state but nothing was
done for PSR2.
For PSR2 we can't only wait for idle state as PSR2 tends to keep
into sleep state(ready to send selective updates).
Waiting for any state below deep sleep proved to be effective in
avoiding the evasion messages and also not wasted a lot of time.
v2:
- dropping the additional wait_for loops, only the _wait_for_atomic()
is necessary
- waiting for states below EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP
v3:
- dropping intel_wait_for_condition_atomic() function
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211005231851.67698-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now the only user of psr_pause/resume is intel_cdclk but
additional users will be added in the future and we may need
do reference counting for PSR pause and resume, for now only adding a
warn_on so this cases do not go unnoticed.
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020003558.222198-2-jose.souza@intel.com
With all the recent fixes PSR2 is properly working in Alderlake-P but
due to some issues that don't have software workarounds it will not be
supported in display steppings older than B0.
Even with this patch PSR2 will no be enabled by default in ADL-P, it
still requires enable_psr2_sel_fetch to be set to true, what some
of our tests does.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-7-jose.souza@intel.com
The Wa_14014971508 is required to fix scanout when a feature that i915
do not support is enabled and this feature is not planned to be enabled
for adlp.
Keeping this workaround enabled can badly hurt power-savings when
a full frame fetch is required(see psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported()
and psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported()).
Here a example that could badly hurt power-savings, userspace does
a page flip to a rotated plane, so CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME set.
But then for a whole 30 seconds nothing in the screen requires updates
but because CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME is set, it will not go into DC5/DC6.
Reverting Wa_14014971508 fixes that, as only a single frame will be
sent and then display can go to DC5/DC6 for those 30 seconds of
idleness.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-6-jose.souza@intel.com
Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that
calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the
slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2
selective fetch.
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets
drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the
cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the
same frame, as userspace does that.
If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor
movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor.
But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch
dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor
had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would
be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new
state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state.
So here switching back to the fast path approach in
intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as
frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the
most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until
mailbox style updates is implemented.
Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand
the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
When PSR2 selective fetch is enabled writes to CURSURFLIVE alone do
not causes the panel to be updated when doing frontbuffer rendering.
From what I was able to figure from experiments the writes to
CURSURFLIVE takes PSR2 from deep sleep but panel is not updated
because PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL has no start and end region set.
As we don't have the dirt area from current flush and invalidate API
and even if we did userspace could do several draws to frontbuffer and
we would need a way to append all the damaged areas of all the draws
that need to be part of next frame.
So here only programing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL to do a single full frame
fetch.
It is a safe approach as if scanout is in the visible area
the single full frame will only be visible for hardware in the next
frame because of the double buffering, and if scanout is in vblank
area it will be draw in the current frame.
No need to disable PSR and wait a few miliseconds to enable it again.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-4-jose.souza@intel.com
We are still missing the PSR2 selective fetch handling of multi-planar
formats but until proper handle is added we can workaround it by
doing full frames fetch when state has such formats.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
PSR2 selective is not supported over rotated and scaled planes.
We had the rotation check in intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
but that code path is only execute when a modeset is needed and
those plane parameters can change without a modeset.
Pipe selective fetch restrictions are also needed, it could be added
in intel_psr_compute_config() but pippe scaling is computed after
it is executed, so leaving as is for now.
There is no much loss in this approach as it would cause selective
fetch to not enabled as for alderlake-P and newer will cause it to
switch to PSR1 that will have the same power-savings as do full pipe
fetch.
Also need to check those restricions in the second
for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state() loop because the state could
only have a plane that is not affected by those restricitons but
the damaged area intersect with planes that has those restrictions,
so a full pipe fetch is required.
v2:
- also handling pipe restrictions
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Stop using HBR2/3 support as a proxy for TPS3/4 support.
The two are no longer 1:1 in the hardware, arguably they
never were due to HSW ULX which does support TPS3 while
being limited to HBR1.
In more recent times GLK gained support for TPS4 while
being limited to HBR2. And on CNL+ some ports support
HBR3 while others are limited to HBR2, but all ports
support TPS4.
v2: s/INTEL_GEN/DISPLAY_VER/
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929162404.6717-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
PSR always had a requirement to only be enabled if there is active
planes but not following that never caused any issues.
But that changes in Alderlake-P, leaving PSR enabled without
active planes causes transcoder/port underruns.
Similar behavior was fixed during the pipe disable sequence by
commit 84030adb9e ("drm/i915/display: Disable audio, DRRS and PSR before planes").
intel_dp_compute_psr_vsc_sdp() had to move from
intel_psr_enable_locked() to intel_psr_compute_config() because we
need to be able to disable/enable PSR from atomic states without
connector and encoder state.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-3-jose.souza@intel.com
We were not completely following the selective fetch programming
sequence, here some things we were doing wrong:
- not programming plane selective fetch a PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL registers
when doing a modeset
- programming PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL out of vblank
With this changes the last remainig underrun found in Alderlake-P is
fixed.
Bspec: 55229
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Wa_16014451276 fixes the starting coordinate for PSR2 selective
updates. CHICKEN_TRANS definition of the workaround bit has a wrong
name based on workaround definition and HSD.
Wa_14014971508 allows the screen to continue to be updated when
coming back from DC5/DC6 and SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME bit is not kept
set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
Wa_16012604467 fixes underruns when exiting PSR2 when it is in one
of its internal states.
Wa_14014971508 is still in pending status in BSpec but by
the time this is reviewed and ready to be merged it will be finalized.
v2:
- renamed register to ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY
- added comment about all ADL-P supported panels being 1 based X
granularity
BSpec: 54369
BSpec: 50054
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-5-jose.souza@intel.com
drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() + drm_atomic_for_each_plane_damage()
returns the full plane area in case no damaged area was set by
userspace or it was discarted by driver.
This is important to fix the rendering of userspace applications that
does frontbuffer rendering and notify driver about dirty areas but do
not set any dirty clips.
With this we don't need to worry about to check and mark the whole
area as damaged in page flips.
Another important change here is the move of
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes() call, it needs to called late
otherwise the area of all the planes would be added to pipe_clip and
not saving power.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Not sure why but when moving the cursor fast it causes some artifacts
of the cursor to be left in the cursor path, adding some pixels above
the cursor to the damaged area fixes the issue, so leaving this as a
workaround until proper fix is found.
This is reproducile on TGL and ADL-P.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-3-jose.souza@intel.com
BSpec states that the minimum number of frames before selective update
is 2, so making sure this minimum limit is fulfilled.
BSpec: 50422
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-2-jose.souza@intel.com
At this point is sure that HSW and BDW will never have PSR enabled by
default, so here dropping it from device info and cleaning up code.
v2:
- enable psr support for display 9
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210827174253.51122-1-jose.souza@intel.com
skl_calc_main_surface_offset() is used to calculate an aligned plane
surface address considering the inner framebuffer x and y offset.
It can not be used by selective fetch functions becase there is no
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_SURF.
So the PLANE_SEL_FETCH_OFFSET.y should only be PLANE_OFFSET.y +
damaged_area_within_plane.y1.
This fixes glitches seen in fbcon caused by typing something in
the terminal.
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210815014346.373945-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR enable/disable sequences now require that we program an extra
register in the PHY to adjust the lane disable power setting.
Bspec: 49274
Bspec: 53885
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723174239.1551352-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
that intersect with pipe damaged area will not
have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
called, causing panel to not be properly updated.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not supported on DG2.
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
