Recently noticed that when mod32 with a known src reg of 0 is performed,
then the dst register is 32-bit truncated in verifier:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r0 = 0
1: R0_w=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (b7) r1 = -1
2: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R10=fp0
2: (b4) w2 = -1
3: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv-1 R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
3: (9c) w1 %= w0
4: R0_w=inv0 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
4: (b7) r0 = 1
5: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
5: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
6: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
6: (b7) r0 = 2
7: R0_w=inv2 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2_w=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
7: (95) exit
7: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R2=inv4294967295 R10=fp0
7: (95) exit
However, as a runtime result, we get 2 instead of 1, meaning the dst
register does not contain (u32)-1 in this case. The reason is fairly
straight forward given the 0 test leaves the dst register as-is:
# ./bpftool p d x i 23
0: (b7) r0 = 0
1: (b7) r1 = -1
2: (b4) w2 = -1
3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
4: (9c) w1 %= w0
5: (b7) r0 = 1
6: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
7: (b7) r0 = 2
8: (95) exit
This was originally not an issue given the dst register was marked as
completely unknown (aka 64 bit unknown). However, after 468f6eafa6
("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification") the verifier casts the register
output to 32 bit, and hence it becomes 32 bit unknown. Note that for
the case where the src register is unknown, the dst register is marked
64 bit unknown. After the fix, the register is truncated by the runtime
and the test passes:
# ./bpftool p d x i 23
0: (b7) r0 = 0
1: (b7) r1 = -1
2: (b4) w2 = -1
3: (16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2
4: (9c) w1 %= w0
5: (05) goto pc+1
6: (bc) w1 = w1
7: (b7) r0 = 1
8: (1d) if r1 == r2 goto pc+1
9: (b7) r0 = 2
10: (95) exit
Semantics also match with {R,W}x mod{64,32} 0 -> {R,W}x. Invalid div
has always been {R,W}x div{64,32} 0 -> 0. Rewrites are as follows:
mod32: mod64:
(16) if w0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
(9c) w1 %= w0 (9f) r1 %= r0
(05) goto pc+1
(bc) w1 = w1
Fixes: 468f6eafa6 ("bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
All 32-bit variants of BPF_FETCH (add, and, or, xor, xchg, cmpxchg)
define a 32-bit subreg and thus have zext_dst set. Their encoding,
however, uses dst_reg field as a base register, which causes
opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32() to zero-extend said base register
instead of the one the insn really defines (r0 or src_reg).
Fix by properly choosing a register being defined, similar to how
check_atomic() already does that.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210204502.83429-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Since sleepable programs are now executing under migrate_disable
the per-cpu maps are safe to use.
The map-in-map were ok to use in sleepable from the time sleepable
progs were introduced.
Note that non-preallocated maps are still not safe, since there is
no rcu_read_lock yet in sleepable programs and dynamically allocated
map elements are relying on rcu protection. The sleepable programs
have rcu_read_lock_trace instead. That limitation will be addresses
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210033634.62081-9-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Move bpf_prog_stats from prog->aux into prog to avoid one extra load
in critical path of program execution.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210033634.62081-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Before this patch, variable offset access to the stack was dissalowed
for regular instructions, but was allowed for "indirect" accesses (i.e.
helpers). This patch removes the restriction, allowing reading and
writing to the stack through stack pointers with variable offsets. This
makes stack-allocated buffers more usable in programs, and brings stack
pointers closer to other types of pointers.
The motivation is being able to use stack-allocated buffers for data
manipulation. When the stack size limit is sufficient, allocating
buffers on the stack is simpler than per-cpu arrays, or other
alternatives.
In unpriviledged programs, variable-offset reads and writes are
disallowed (they were already disallowed for the indirect access case)
because the speculative execution checking code doesn't support them.
Additionally, when writing through a variable-offset stack pointer, if
any pointers are in the accessible range, there's possilibities of later
leaking pointers because the write cannot be tracked precisely.
Writes with variable offset mark the whole range as initialized, even
though we don't know which stack slots are actually written. This is in
order to not reject future reads to these slots. Note that this doesn't
affect writes done through helpers; like before, helpers need the whole
stack range to be initialized to begin with.
All the stack slots are in range are considered scalars after the write;
variable-offset register spills are not tracked.
For reads, all the stack slots in the variable range needs to be
initialized (but see above about what writes do), otherwise the read is
rejected. All register spilled in stack slots that might be read are
marked as having been read, however reads through such pointers don't do
register filling; the target register will always be either a scalar or
a constant zero.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
While reviewing a different fix, John and I noticed an oddity in one of the
BPF program dumps that stood out, for example:
# bpftool p d x i 13
0: (b7) r0 = 808464450
1: (b4) w4 = 808464432
2: (bc) w0 = w0
3: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
4: (9c) w4 %= w0
[...]
In line 2 we noticed that the mov32 would 32 bit truncate the original src
register for the div/mod operation. While for the two operations the dst
register is typically marked unknown e.g. from adjust_scalar_min_max_vals()
the src register is not, and thus verifier keeps tracking original bounds,
simplified:
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r0 = -1
1: R0_w=invP-1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (b7) r1 = -1
2: R0_w=invP-1 R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0
2: (3c) w0 /= w1
3: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP-1 R10=fp0
3: (77) r1 >>= 32
4: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0
4: (bf) r0 = r1
5: R0_w=invP4294967295 R1_w=invP4294967295 R10=fp0
5: (95) exit
processed 6 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
Runtime result of r0 at exit is 0 instead of expected -1. Remove the
verifier mov32 src rewrite in div/mod and replace it with a jmp32 test
instead. After the fix, we result in the following code generation when
having dividend r1 and divisor r6:
div, 64 bit: div, 32 bit:
0: (b7) r6 = 8 0: (b7) r6 = 8
1: (b7) r1 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8
2: (55) if r6 != 0x0 goto pc+2 2: (56) if w6 != 0x0 goto pc+2
3: (ac) w1 ^= w1 3: (ac) w1 ^= w1
4: (05) goto pc+1 4: (05) goto pc+1
5: (3f) r1 /= r6 5: (3c) w1 /= w6
6: (b7) r0 = 0 6: (b7) r0 = 0
7: (95) exit 7: (95) exit
mod, 64 bit: mod, 32 bit:
0: (b7) r6 = 8 0: (b7) r6 = 8
1: (b7) r1 = 8 1: (b7) r1 = 8
2: (15) if r6 == 0x0 goto pc+1 2: (16) if w6 == 0x0 goto pc+1
3: (9f) r1 %= r6 3: (9c) w1 %= w6
4: (b7) r0 = 0 4: (b7) r0 = 0
5: (95) exit 5: (95) exit
x86 in particular can throw a 'divide error' exception for div
instruction not only for divisor being zero, but also for the case
when the quotient is too large for the designated register. For the
edx:eax and rdx:rax dividend pair it is not an issue in x86 BPF JIT
since we always zero edx (rdx). Hence really the only protection
needed is against divisor being zero.
Fixes: 68fda450a7 ("bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero")
Co-developed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Anatoly has been fuzzing with kBdysch harness and reported a hang in
one of the outcomes:
func#0 @0
0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
0: (b7) r0 = 808464450
1: R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
1: (b4) w4 = 808464432
2: R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
2: (9c) w4 %= w0
3: R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0
3: (66) if w4 s> 0x30303030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff),s32_max_value=808464432) R10=fp0
4: R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff),s32_max_value=808464432) R10=fp0
4: (7f) r0 >>= r0
5: R0_w=invP(id=0) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff),s32_max_value=808464432) R10=fp0
5: (9c) w4 %= w0
6: R0_w=invP(id=0) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
6: (66) if w0 s> 0x3030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
7: R0=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
7: (d6) if w0 s<= 0x303030 goto pc+1
9: R0=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
9: (95) exit
propagating r0
from 6 to 7: safe
4: R0_w=invP808464450 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464433,umax_value=2147483647,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff)) R10=fp0
4: (7f) r0 >>= r0
5: R0_w=invP(id=0) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464433,umax_value=2147483647,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff)) R10=fp0
5: (9c) w4 %= w0
6: R0_w=invP(id=0) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
6: (66) if w0 s> 0x3030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
propagating r0
7: safe
propagating r0
from 6 to 7: safe
processed 15 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1
The underlying program was xlated as follows:
# bpftool p d x i 10
0: (b7) r0 = 808464450
1: (b4) w4 = 808464432
2: (bc) w0 = w0
3: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
4: (9c) w4 %= w0
5: (66) if w4 s> 0x30303030 goto pc+0
6: (7f) r0 >>= r0
7: (bc) w0 = w0
8: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
9: (9c) w4 %= w0
10: (66) if w0 s> 0x3030 goto pc+0
11: (d6) if w0 s<= 0x303030 goto pc+1
12: (05) goto pc-1
13: (95) exit
The verifier rewrote original instructions it recognized as dead code with
'goto pc-1', but reality differs from verifier simulation in that we are
actually able to trigger a hang due to hitting the 'goto pc-1' instructions.
Taking a closer look at the verifier analysis, the reason is that it misjudges
its pruning decision at the first 'from 6 to 7: safe' occasion. What happens
is that while both old/cur registers are marked as precise, they get misjudged
for the jmp32 case as range_within() yields true, meaning that the prior
verification path with a wider register bound could be verified successfully
and therefore the current path with a narrower register bound is deemed safe
as well whereas in reality it's not. R0 old/cur path's bounds compare as
follows:
old: smin_value=0x8000000000000000,smax_value=0x7fffffffffffffff,umin_value=0x0,umax_value=0xffffffffffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffffffffffff)
cur: smin_value=0x8000000000000000,smax_value=0x7fffffff7fffffff,umin_value=0x0,umax_value=0xffffffff7fffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff7fffffff)
old: s32_min_value=0x80000000,s32_max_value=0x00003030,u32_min_value=0x00000000,u32_max_value=0xffffffff
cur: s32_min_value=0x00003031,s32_max_value=0x7fffffff,u32_min_value=0x00003031,u32_max_value=0x7fffffff
The 64 bit bounds generally look okay and while the information that got
propagated from 32 to 64 bit looks correct as well, it's not precise enough
for judging a conditional jmp32. Given the latter only operates on subregisters
we also need to take these into account as well for a range_within() probe
in order to be able to prune paths. Extending the range_within() constraint
to both bounds will be able to tell us that the old signed 32 bit bounds are
not wider than the cur signed 32 bit bounds.
With the fix in place, the program will now verify the 'goto' branch case as
it should have been:
[...]
6: R0_w=invP(id=0) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
6: (66) if w0 s> 0x3030 goto pc+0
R0_w=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
7: R0=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
7: (d6) if w0 s<= 0x303030 goto pc+1
9: R0=invP(id=0,s32_max_value=12336) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
9: (95) exit
7: R0_w=invP(id=0,smax_value=9223372034707292159,umax_value=18446744071562067967,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff7fffffff),s32_min_value=12337,u32_min_value=12337,u32_max_value=2147483647) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
7: (d6) if w0 s<= 0x303030 goto pc+1
R0_w=invP(id=0,smax_value=9223372034707292159,umax_value=18446744071562067967,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff7fffffff),s32_min_value=3158065,u32_min_value=3158065,u32_max_value=2147483647) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
8: R0_w=invP(id=0,smax_value=9223372034707292159,umax_value=18446744071562067967,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff7fffffff),s32_min_value=3158065,u32_min_value=3158065,u32_max_value=2147483647) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R4_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
8: (30) r0 = *(u8 *)skb[808464432]
BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields
processed 11 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1
The bug is quite subtle in the sense that when verifier would determine that
a given branch is dead code, it would (here: wrongly) remove these instructions
from the program and hard-wire the taken branch for privileged programs instead
of the 'goto pc-1' rewrites which will cause hard to debug problems.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fix incorrect is_branch{32,64}_taken() analysis for the jsgt case. The return
code for both will tell the caller whether a given conditional jump is taken
or not, e.g. 1 means branch will be taken [for the involved registers] and the
goto target will be executed, 0 means branch will not be taken and instead we
fall-through to the next insn, and last but not least a -1 denotes that it is
not known at verification time whether a branch will be taken or not. Now while
the jsgt has the branch-taken case correct with reg->s32_min_value > sval, the
branch-not-taken case is off-by-one when testing for reg->s32_max_value < sval
since the branch will also be taken for reg->s32_max_value == sval. The jgt
branch analysis, for example, gets this right.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Fixes: 4f7b3e8258 ("bpf: improve verifier branch analysis")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There is no functionality change. This refactoring intends
to facilitate next patch change with BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204234827.1628953-1-yhs@fb.com
The BPF ringbuffer map is pre-allocated and the implementation logic
does not rely on disabling preemption or per-cpu data structures. Using
the BPF ringbuffer sleepable LSM and tracing programs does not trigger
any warnings with DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, DEBUG_PREEMPT,
PROVE_RCU and PROVE_LOCKING and LOCKDEP enabled.
This allows helpers like bpf_copy_from_user and bpf_ima_inode_hash to
write to the BPF ring buffer from sleepable BPF programs.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204193622.3367275-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
When BPF_FETCH is set, atomic instructions load a value from memory
into a register. The current verifier code first checks via
check_mem_access whether we can access the memory, and then checks
via check_reg_arg whether we can write into the register.
For loads, check_reg_arg has the side-effect of marking the
register's value as unkonwn, and check_mem_access has the side effect
of propagating bounds from memory to the register. This currently only
takes effect for stack memory.
Therefore with the current order, bounds information is thrown away,
but by simply reversing the order of check_reg_arg
vs. check_mem_access, we can instead propagate bounds smartly.
A simple test is added with an infinite loop that can only be proved
unreachable if this propagation is present. This is implemented both
with C and directly in test_verifier using assembly.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202135002.4024825-1-jackmanb@google.com
At the moment, BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_BIND hooks can rewrite user_port
to the privileged ones (< ip_unprivileged_port_start), but it will
be rejected later on in the __inet_bind or __inet6_bind.
Let's add another return value to indicate that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE
check should be ignored. Use the same idea as we currently use
in cgroup/egress where bit #1 indicates CN. Instead, for
cgroup/bind{4,6}, bit #1 indicates that CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE should
be bypassed.
v5:
- rename flags to be less confusing (Andrey Ignatov)
- rework BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY to work on flags
and accept BPF_RET_SET_CN (no behavioral changes)
v4:
- Add missing IPv6 support (Martin KaFai Lau)
v3:
- Update description (Martin KaFai Lau)
- Fix capability restore in selftest (Martin KaFai Lau)
v2:
- Switch to explicit return code (Martin KaFai Lau)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127193140.3170382-1-sdf@google.com
Conflicts:
drivers/net/can/dev.c
commit 03f16c5075 ("can: dev: can_restart: fix use after free bug")
commit 3e77f70e73 ("can: dev: move driver related infrastructure into separate subdir")
Code move.
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
commit 8e4052c32d ("net: dsa: b53: fix an off by one in checking "vlan->vid"")
commit b7a9e0da2d ("net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects")
Field rename.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Fix incorrect signed_{sub,add32}_overflows() input types (and a related buggy
comment). It looks like this might have slipped in via copy/paste issue, also
given prior to 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
the signature of signed_sub_overflows() had s64 a and s64 b as its input args
whereas now they are truncated to s32. Thus restore proper types. Also, the case
of signed_add32_overflows() is not consistent to signed_sub32_overflows(). Both
have s32 as inputs, therefore align the former.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: De4dCr0w <sa516203@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This adds instructions for
atomic[64]_[fetch_]and
atomic[64]_[fetch_]or
atomic[64]_[fetch_]xor
All these operations are isomorphic enough to implement with the same
verifier, interpreter, and x86 JIT code, hence being a single commit.
The main interesting thing here is that x86 doesn't directly support
the fetch_ version these operations, so we need to generate a CMPXCHG
loop in the JIT. This requires the use of two temporary registers,
IIUC it's safe to use BPF_REG_AX and x86's AUX_REG for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-10-jackmanb@google.com
This adds two atomic opcodes, both of which include the BPF_FETCH
flag. XCHG without the BPF_FETCH flag would naturally encode
atomic_set. This is not supported because it would be of limited
value to userspace (it doesn't imply any barriers). CMPXCHG without
BPF_FETCH woulud be an atomic compare-and-write. We don't have such
an operation in the kernel so it isn't provided to BPF either.
There are two significant design decisions made for the CMPXCHG
instruction:
- To solve the issue that this operation fundamentally has 3
operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the
operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is
hard-coded to be R0. x86 has similar design (and A64 doesn't
have this problem).
A potential alternative might be to encode the other operand's
register number in the immediate field.
- The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the old value, while the C11
userspace APIs return a boolean indicating the comparison
result. Which should BPF do? A64 returns the old value. x86 returns
the old value in the hard-coded register (and also sets a
flag). That means return-old-value is easier to JIT, so that's
what we use.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-8-jackmanb@google.com
The BPF_FETCH field can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC
instructions, in order to have the previous value of the
atomically-modified memory location loaded into the src register
after an atomic op is carried out.
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-7-jackmanb@google.com
I can't find a reason why this code is in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64;
since I'll be modifying it in a subsequent commit, tidy it up.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-6-jackmanb@google.com
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new
operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with
the immediate discriminating different operations.
In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start
calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD.
This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the
immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero.
All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is
kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel
headers.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
Add support for pointer to mem register spilling, to allow the verifier
to track pointers to valid memory addresses. Such pointers are returned
for example by a successful call of the bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper.
The patch was partially contributed by CyberArk Software, Inc.
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210113053810.13518-1-gilad.reti@gmail.com
Add support for directly accessing kernel module variables from BPF programs
using special ldimm64 instructions. This functionality builds upon vmlinux
ksym support, but extends ldimm64 with src_reg=BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID to allow
specifying kernel module BTF's FD in insn[1].imm field.
During BPF program load time, verifier will resolve FD to BTF object and will
take reference on BTF object itself and, for module BTFs, corresponding module
as well, to make sure it won't be unloaded from under running BPF program. The
mechanism used is similar to how bpf_prog keeps track of used bpf_maps.
One interesting change is also in how per-CPU variable is determined. The
logic is to find .data..percpu data section in provided BTF, but both vmlinux
and module each have their own .data..percpu entries in BTF. So for module's
case, the search for DATASEC record needs to look at only module's added BTF
types. This is implemented with custom search function.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-6-andrii@kernel.org
The error message here is misleading, the argument will be rejected unless
it is a known constant.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112123913.2016804-1-jackmanb@google.com
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-14
1) Expose bpf_sk_storage_*() helpers to iterator programs, from Florent Revest.
2) Add AF_XDP selftests based on veth devs to BPF selftests, from Weqaar Janjua.
3) Support for finding BTF based kernel attach targets through libbpf's
bpf_program__set_attach_target() API, from Andrii Nakryiko.
4) Permit pointers on stack for helper calls in the verifier, from Yonghong Song.
5) Fix overflows in hash map elem size after rlimit removal, from Eric Dumazet.
6) Get rid of direct invocation of llc in BPF selftests, from Andrew Delgadillo.
7) Fix xsk_recvmsg() to reorder socket state check before access, from Björn Töpel.
8) Add new libbpf API helper to retrieve ring buffer epoll fd, from Brendan Jackman.
9) Batch of minor BPF selftest improvements all over the place, from Florian Lehner,
KP Singh, Jiri Olsa and various others.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (31 commits)
selftests/bpf: Add a test for ptr_to_map_value on stack for helper access
bpf: Permits pointers on stack for helper calls
libbpf: Expose libbpf ring_buffer epoll_fd
selftests/bpf: Add set_attach_target() API selftest for module target
libbpf: Support modules in bpf_program__set_attach_target() API
selftests/bpf: Silence ima_setup.sh when not running in verbose mode.
selftests/bpf: Drop the need for LLVM's llc
selftests/bpf: fix bpf_testmod.ko recompilation logic
samples/bpf: Fix possible hang in xdpsock with multiple threads
selftests/bpf: Make selftest compilation work on clang 11
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - adding xdpxceiver to .gitignore
selftests/bpf: Drop tcp-{client,server}.py from Makefile
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Bi-directional Sockets - SKB, DRV
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - Socket Teardown - SKB, DRV
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - DRV POLL, NOPOLL
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests - SKB POLL, NOPOLL
selftests/bpf: Xsk selftests framework
bpf: Only provide bpf_sock_from_file with CONFIG_NET
bpf: Return -ENOTSUPP when attaching to non-kernel BTF
xsk: Validate socket state in xsk_recvmsg, prior touching socket members
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201214214316.20642-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Currently, when checking stack memory accessed by helper calls,
for spills, only PTR_TO_BTF_ID and SCALAR_VALUE are
allowed.
Song discovered an issue where the below bpf program
int dump_task(struct bpf_iter__task *ctx)
{
struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
static char[] info = "abc";
BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info);
return 0;
}
may cause a verifier failure.
The verifier output looks like:
; struct seq_file *seq = ctx->meta->seq;
1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info);
2: (18) r2 = 0xffff9054400f6000
4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r2
5: (bf) r4 = r10
;
6: (07) r4 += -8
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%s\n", info);
7: (18) r2 = 0xffff9054400fe000
9: (b4) w3 = 4
10: (b4) w5 = 8
11: (85) call bpf_seq_printf#126
R1_w=ptr_seq_file(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=4,imm=0)
R3_w=inv4 R4_w=fp-8 R5_w=inv8 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=map_value
last_idx 11 first_idx 0
regs=8 stack=0 before 10: (b4) w5 = 8
regs=8 stack=0 before 9: (b4) w3 = 4
invalid indirect read from stack off -8+0 size 8
Basically, the verifier complains the map_value pointer at "fp-8" location.
To fix the issue, if env->allow_ptr_leaks is true, let us also permit
pointers on the stack to be accessible by the helper.
Reported-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201210013349.943719-1-yhs@fb.com
xdp_return_frame_bulk() needs to pass a xdp_buff
to __xdp_return().
strlcpy got converted to strscpy but here it makes no
functional difference, so just keep the right code.
Conflicts:
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The 64-bit signed bounds should not affect 32-bit signed bounds unless the
verifier knows that upper 32-bits are either all 1s or all 0s. For example the
register with smin_value==1 doesn't mean that s32_min_value is also equal to 1,
since smax_value could be larger than 32-bit subregister can hold.
The verifier refines the smax/s32_max return value from certain helpers in
do_refine_retval_range(). Teach the verifier to recognize that smin/s32_min
value is also bounded. When both smin and smax bounds fit into 32-bit
subregister the verifier can propagate those bounds.
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-12-03
The main changes are:
1) Support BTF in kernel modules, from Andrii.
2) Introduce preferred busy-polling, from Björn.
3) bpf_ima_inode_hash() and bpf_bprm_opts_set() helpers, from KP Singh.
4) Memcg-based memory accounting for bpf objects, from Roman.
5) Allow bpf_{s,g}etsockopt from cgroup bind{4,6} hooks, from Stanislav.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (118 commits)
selftests/bpf: Fix invalid use of strncat in test_sockmap
libbpf: Use memcpy instead of strncpy to please GCC
selftests/bpf: Add fentry/fexit/fmod_ret selftest for kernel module
selftests/bpf: Add tp_btf CO-RE reloc test for modules
libbpf: Support attachment of BPF tracing programs to kernel modules
libbpf: Factor out low-level BPF program loading helper
bpf: Allow to specify kernel module BTFs when attaching BPF programs
bpf: Remove hard-coded btf_vmlinux assumption from BPF verifier
selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs selftest relying on kernel module BTF
selftests/bpf: Add support for marking sub-tests as skipped
selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing
libbpf: Add kernel module BTF support for CO-RE relocations
libbpf: Refactor CO-RE relocs to not assume a single BTF object
libbpf: Add internal helper to load BTF data by FD
bpf: Keep module's btf_data_size intact after load
bpf: Fix bpf_put_raw_tracepoint()'s use of __module_address()
selftests/bpf: Add Userspace tests for TCP_WINDOW_CLAMP
bpf: Adds support for setting window clamp
samples/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "recieving" -> "receiving"
bpf: Fix cold build of test_progs-no_alu32
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204021936.85653-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Remove a permeating assumption thoughout BPF verifier of vmlinux BTF. Instead,
wherever BTF type IDs are involved, also track the instance of struct btf that
goes along with the type ID. This allows to gradually add support for kernel
module BTFs and using/tracking module types across BPF helper calls and
registers.
This patch also renames btf_id() function to btf_obj_id() to minimize naming
clash with using btf_id to denote BTF *type* ID, rather than BTF *object*'s ID.
Also, altough btf_vmlinux can't get destructed and thus doesn't need
refcounting, module BTFs need that, so apply BTF refcounting universally when
BPF program is using BTF-powered attachment (tp_btf, fentry/fexit, etc). This
makes for simpler clean up code.
Now that BTF type ID is not enough to uniquely identify a BTF type, extend BPF
trampoline key to include BTF object ID. To differentiate that from target
program BPF ID, set 31st bit of type ID. BTF type IDs (at least currently) are
not allowed to take full 32 bits, so there is no danger of confusing that bit
with a valid BTF type ID.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201203204634.1325171-10-andrii@kernel.org
The current implementation uses a number of gotos to implement a loop
and different paths within the loop, which makes the code less readable
than it would be with an explicit while-loop. This patch also replaces a
chain of if/if-elses keyed on the same expression with a switch
statement.
No change in behaviour is intended.
Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201121015509.3594191-1-wedsonaf@google.com
Currently verifier enforces return code checks for subprograms in the
same manner as it does for program entry points. This prevents returning
arbitrary scalar values from subprograms. Scalar type of returned values
is checked by btf_prepare_func_args() and hence it should be safe to
allow only scalars for now. Relax return code checks for subprograms and
allow any correct scalar values.
Fixes: 51c39bb1d5 (bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification)
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201113171756.90594-1-me@ubique.spb.ru
Update the set of sleepable hooks with the ones that do not trigger
a warning with might_fault() when exercised with the correct kernel
config options enabled, i.e.
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
LOCKDEP=y
PROVE_LOCKING=y
This means that a sleepable LSM eBPF program can be attached to these
LSM hooks. A new helper method bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook is added and
the set is maintained locally in bpf_lsm.c
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201113005930.541956-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
This patch adds the verifier support to recognize inlined branch conditions.
The LLVM knows that the branch evaluates to the same value, but the verifier
couldn't track it. Hence causing valid programs to be rejected.
The potential LLVM workaround: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87428
can have undesired side effects, since LLVM doesn't know that
skb->data/data_end are being compared. LLVM has to introduce extra boolean
variable and use inline_asm trick to force easier for the verifier assembly.
Instead teach the verifier to recognize that
r1 = skb->data;
r1 += 10;
r2 = skb->data_end;
if (r1 > r2) {
here r1 points beyond packet_end and
subsequent
if (r1 > r2) // always evaluates to "true".
}
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201111031213.25109-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call
to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code.
This fixes the following coccicheck warning:
./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1605071026-25906-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com
The currently available bpf_get_current_task returns an unsigned integer
which can be used along with BPF_CORE_READ to read data from
the task_struct but still cannot be used as an input argument to a
helper that accepts an ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID of type task_struct.
In order to implement this helper a new return type, RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
is added. This is similar to RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL but does not
require checking the nullness of returned pointer.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-6-kpsingh@chromium.org
Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets and inodes add local storage
for task_struct.
The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the
task_struct. i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning task
with a callback to the bpf_task_storage_free from the task_free LSM
hook.
The BPF LSM allocates an __rcu pointer to the bpf_local_storage in
the security blob which are now stackable and can co-exist with other
LSMs.
The userspace map operations can be done by using a pid fd as a key
passed to the lookup, update and delete operations.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-3-kpsingh@chromium.org
Usage of spin locks was not allowed for tracing programs due to
insufficient preemption checks. The verifier does not currently prevent
LSM programs from using spin locks, but the helpers are not exposed
via bpf_lsm_func_proto.
Based on the discussion in [1], non-sleepable LSM programs should be
able to use bpf_spin_{lock, unlock}.
Sleepable LSM programs can be preempted which means that allowng spin
locks will need more work (disabling preemption and the verifier
ensuring that no sleepable helpers are called when a spin lock is held).
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201103153132.2717326-1-kpsingh@chromium.org/T/#md601a053229287659071600d3483523f752cd2fb
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201106103747.2780972-2-kpsingh@chromium.org
The commit af7ec13833 ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper")
introduces RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL and
the commit eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
introduces RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL.
Note that for RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL, the reg0->type
could become PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL which is not covered by
BPF_PROBE_MEM.
The BPF_REG_0 will then hold a _OR_NULL pointer type. This _OR_NULL
pointer type requires the bpf program to explicitly do a NULL check first.
After NULL check, the verifier will mark all registers having
the same reg->id as safe to use. However, the reg->id
is not set for those new _OR_NULL return types. One of the ways
that may be wrong is, checking NULL for one btf_id typed pointer will
end up validating all other btf_id typed pointers because
all of them have id == 0. The later tests will exercise
this path.
To fix it and also avoid similar issue in the future, this patch
moves the id generation logic out of each individual RET type
test in check_helper_call(). Instead, it does one
reg_type_may_be_null() test and then do the id generation
if needed.
This patch also adds a WARN_ON_ONCE in mark_ptr_or_null_reg()
to catch future breakage.
The _OR_NULL pointer usage in the bpf_iter_reg.ctx_arg_info is
fine because it just happens that the existing id generation after
check_ctx_access() has covered it. It is also using the
reg_type_may_be_null() to decide if id generation is needed or not.
Fixes: af7ec13833 ("bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock() helper")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71e ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019194212.1050855-1-kafai@fb.com
The 64-bit JEQ/JNE handling in reg_set_min_max() was clearing reg->id in either
true or false branch. In the case 'if (reg->id)' check was done on the other
branch the counter part register would have reg->id == 0 when called into
find_equal_scalars(). In such case the helper would incorrectly identify other
registers with id == 0 as equivalent and propagate the state incorrectly.
Fix it by preserving ID across reg_set_min_max().
In other words any kind of comparison operator on the scalar register
should preserve its ID to recognize:
r1 = r2
if (r1 == 20) {
#1 here both r1 and r2 == 20
} else if (r2 < 20) {
#2 here both r1 and r2 < 20
}
The patch is addressing #1 case. The #2 was working correctly already.
Fixes: 75748837b7 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201014175608.1416-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-10-12
The main changes are:
1) The BPF verifier improvements to track register allocation pattern, from Alexei and Yonghong.
2) libbpf relocation support for different size load/store, from Andrii.
3) bpf_redirect_peer() helper and support for inner map array with different max_entries, from Daniel.
4) BPF support for per-cpu variables, form Hao.
5) sockmap improvements, from John.
====================
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Recent work in f4d0525921 ("bpf: Add map_meta_equal map ops") and 134fede4ee
("bpf: Relax max_entries check for most of the inner map types") added support
for dynamic inner max elements for most map-in-map types. Exceptions were maps
like array or prog array where the map_gen_lookup() callback uses the maps'
max_entries field as a constant when emitting instructions.
We recently implemented Maglev consistent hashing into Cilium's load balancer
which uses map-in-map with an outer map being hash and inner being array holding
the Maglev backend table for each service. This has been designed this way in
order to reduce overall memory consumption given the outer hash map allows to
avoid preallocating a large, flat memory area for all services. Also, the
number of service mappings is not always known a-priori.
The use case for dynamic inner array map entries is to further reduce memory
overhead, for example, some services might just have a small number of back
ends while others could have a large number. Right now the Maglev backend table
for small and large number of backends would need to have the same inner array
map entries which adds a lot of unneeded overhead.
Dynamic inner array map entries can be realized by avoiding the inlined code
generation for their lookup. The lookup will still be efficient since it will
be calling into array_map_lookup_elem() directly and thus avoiding retpoline.
The patch adds a BPF_F_INNER_MAP flag to map creation which therefore skips
inline code generation and relaxes array_map_meta_equal() check to ignore both
maps' max_entries. This also still allows to have faster lookups for map-in-map
when BPF_F_INNER_MAP is not specified and hence dynamic max_entries not needed.
Example code generation where inner map is dynamic sized array:
# bpftool p d x i 125
int handle__sys_enter(void * ctx):
; int handle__sys_enter(void *ctx)
0: (b4) w1 = 0
; int key = 0;
1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1
2: (bf) r2 = r10
;
3: (07) r2 += -4
; inner_map = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&outer_arr_dyn, &key);
4: (18) r1 = map[id:468]
6: (07) r1 += 272
7: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)
8: (35) if r0 >= 0x3 goto pc+5
9: (67) r0 <<= 3
10: (0f) r0 += r1
11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)
12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
13: (05) goto pc+1
14: (b7) r0 = 0
15: (b4) w6 = -1
; if (!inner_map)
16: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+6
17: (bf) r2 = r10
;
18: (07) r2 += -4
; val = bpf_map_lookup_elem(inner_map, &key);
19: (bf) r1 = r0 | No inlining but instead
20: (85) call array_map_lookup_elem#149280 | call to array_map_lookup_elem()
; return val ? *val : -1; | for inner array lookup.
21: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
; return val ? *val : -1;
22: (61) r6 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)
; }
23: (bc) w0 = w6
24: (95) exit
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201010234006.7075-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
Under register pressure the llvm may spill registers with bounds into the stack.
The verifier has to track them through spill/fill otherwise many kinds of bound
errors will be seen. The spill/fill of induction variables was already
happening. This patch extends this logic from tracking spill/fill of a constant
into any bounded register. There is no need to track spill/fill of unbounded,
since no new information will be retrieved from the stack during register fill.
Though extra stack difference could cause state pruning to be less effective, no
adverse affects were seen from this patch on selftests and on cilium programs.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
The llvm register allocator may use two different registers representing the
same virtual register. In such case the following pattern can be observed:
1047: (bf) r9 = r6
1048: (a5) if r6 < 0x1000 goto pc+1
1050: ...
1051: (a5) if r9 < 0x2 goto pc+66
1052: ...
1053: (bf) r2 = r9 /* r2 needs to have upper and lower bounds */
This is normal behavior of greedy register allocator.
The slides 137+ explain why regalloc introduces such register copy:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/slides/Yatsina-LLVM%20Greedy%20Register%20Allocator.pdf
There is no way to tell llvm 'not to do this'.
Hence the verifier has to recognize such patterns.
In order to track this information without backtracking allocate ID
for scalars in a similar way as it's done for find_good_pkt_pointers().
When the verifier encounters r9 = r6 assignment it will assign the same ID
to both registers. Later if either register range is narrowed via conditional
jump propagate the register state into the other register.
Clear register ID in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() for any alu instruction. The
register ID is ignored for scalars in regsafe() and doesn't affect state
pruning. mark_reg_unknown() clears the ID. It's used to process call, endian
and other instructions. Hence ID is explicitly cleared only in
adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and in 32-bit mov.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Small conflict around locking in rxrpc_process_event() -
channel_lock moved to bundle in next, while state lock
needs _bh() from net.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Simon reported an issue with the current scalar32_min_max_or() implementation.
That is, compared to the other 32 bit subreg tracking functions, the code in
scalar32_min_max_or() stands out that it's using the 64 bit registers instead
of 32 bit ones. This leads to bounds tracking issues, for example:
[...]
8: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)
R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
9: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
9: (b7) r0 = 1
10: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
10: (18) r2 = 0x600000002
12: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
12: (ad) if r1 < r2 goto pc+1
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
13: (95) exit
14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x7ffffffff)) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
14: (25) if r1 > 0x0 goto pc+1
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: (95) exit
16: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
16: (47) r1 |= 0
17: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=32212254719,var_off=(0x1; 0x700000000),s32_max_value=1,u32_max_value=1) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
[...]
The bound tests on the map value force the upper unsigned bound to be 25769803777
in 64 bit (0b11000000000000000000000000000000001) and then lower one to be 1. By
using OR they are truncated and thus result in the range [1,1] for the 32 bit reg
tracker. This is incorrect given the only thing we know is that the value must be
positive and thus 2147483647 (0b1111111111111111111111111111111) at max for the
subregs. Fix it by using the {u,s}32_{min,max}_value vars instead. This also makes
sense, for example, for the case where we update dst_reg->s32_{min,max}_value in
the else branch we need to use the newly computed dst_reg->u32_{min,max}_value as
we know that these are positive. Previously, in the else branch the 64 bit values
of umin_value=1 and umax_value=32212254719 were used and latter got truncated to
be 1 as upper bound there. After the fix the subreg range is now correct:
[...]
8: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)
R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
9: R0=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=48,imm=0) R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
9: (b7) r0 = 1
10: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
10: (18) r2 = 0x600000002
12: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
12: (ad) if r1 < r2 goto pc+1
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=25769803778) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
13: (95) exit
14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x7ffffffff)) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
14: (25) if r1 > 0x0 goto pc+1
R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
15: (95) exit
16: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=25769803777,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
16: (47) r1 |= 0
17: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=1,umax_value=32212254719,var_off=(0x0; 0x77fffffff),u32_max_value=2147483647) R2_w=inv25769803778 R10=fp0 fp-8=mmmmmmmm
[...]
Fixes: 3f50f132d8 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Reported-by: Simon Scannell <scannell.smn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fix build errors in kernel/bpf/verifier.c when CONFIG_NET is
not enabled.
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3995:13: error: ‘btf_sock_ids’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘bpf_sock_ops’?
.btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON],
../kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3995:26: error: ‘BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON’?
.btf_id = &btf_sock_ids[BTF_SOCK_TYPE_SOCK_COMMON],
Fixes: 1df8f55a37 ("bpf: Enable bpf_skc_to_* sock casting helper to networking prog type")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201007021613.13646-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Add bpf_this_cpu_ptr() to help access percpu var on this cpu. This
helper always returns a valid pointer, therefore no need to check
returned value for NULL. Also note that all programs run with
preemption disabled, which means that the returned pointer is stable
during all the execution of the program.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-6-haoluo@google.com
