These were missed the first time around due to the driver version I traced
using the older registers still.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There are differences on GM200 and newer too, but we can't fix them there
as they come from firmware packages.
A request has been made to NVIDIA to release updated firmware.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's a number of places that require this data, so let's separate out
the calculations to ensure they remain consistent.
This is incorrect for GM200 and newer, but will produce the same results
as we did before.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
There's also a couple of hardcoded tables for a couple of very specific
configurations that NVGPU's algorithm didn't work for.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:56:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:99:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:271:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....
In fact, both functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This was really inconsistent, some implementations could touch PPCs
that didn't exist, others neglected to touch ones that did.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Shorter device name, match Tegra and our existing enums.
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).
Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.
A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
2015-01-22 12:17:45 +10:00
Renamed from drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/graph/gm107.c (Browse further)
