I've botched this, so let's fix it.
Botched in
commit eb0b44adc0
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed Mar 18 14:47:59 2015 +0100
drm/i915: kerneldoc for i915_gem_shrinker.c
v2: Be a good citizen^Wmaintainer and add the proper commit citation.
Noticed by Jani.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
When looking for viable candidates to shrink, we only want objects that
are not pinned. However to do so we performed a double iteration over
the vma in the objects, first looking for the pin-count, then looking
for allocations. We can do both at once and be slightly more explicit in
our validity test.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
And remove one bogus * from i915_gem_gtt.c since that's not a
kerneldoc there.
v2: Review from Chris:
- Clarify memory space to better distinguish from address space.
- Add note that shrink doesn't guarantee the freed memory and that
users must fall back to shrink_all.
- Explain how pinning ties in with eviction/shrinker.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Two code changes:
- Extract i915_gem_shrinker_init.
- Inline i915_gem_object_is_purgeable since we open-code it everywhere
else too.
This already has the benefit of pulling all the shrinker code
together, next patch adds a bit of kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
