This patch is a follow-up for patch "filter: add XOR instruction for use
with X/K" that implements BPF SPARC JIT parts for the BPF XOR operation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It gets clobbered by the kernel's VISEntryHalf, so we have to save it
in a different register than the set clobbered by that macro.
The instance in glibc is OK and doesn't have this problem.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In case of error, function module_alloc() in other platform never
returns ERR_PTR(), and all of the user only check for NULL, so
we'd better return NULL instead of ERR_PTR().
dpatch engine is used to auto generated this patch.
(https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
GNU Binutils 2.20.1 generates .eh_frame sections that uses R_SPARC_DISP32.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
removes unnecessary semicolon
Found by Coccinelle: http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Most architectures implement this in exactly the same way. Instead of
having each architecture duplicate this function, provide a single
implementation in the core and make it a weak symbol so that it can be
overridden on architectures where it is required.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Remove the __init annotations in order to keep pci_fixup_irqs() around
after init (e.g. for hotplug). This requires the same change for the
implementation of pcibios_update_irq() on all architectures. While at
it, all __devinit annotations are removed as well, since they will be
useless now that HOTPLUG is always on.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The IV wasn't being propagated properly past the first loop
iteration.
This bug lived only because the crypto layer tests for
cbc(des) do not have any cases that go more than one loop.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Just simply provide a device table containing an entry for sun4v cpus,
the capability mask checks in the drivers themselves will take care of
the rest.
This makes the bootup logs on pre-T4 cpus slightly more verbose, with
each driver indicating lack of support for the associated opcode(s).
But this isn't too much of a real problem.
I toyed with the idea of using explicit entries with compatability
fields of "SPARC-T4", "SPARC-T5", etc. but all future cpus will have
some subset of these opcodes available and this would just be one more
pointless thing to do as each new cpu is released with a new string.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Make the crypto opcode implementations have a higher priority than
those provides by the ring buffer based Niagara crypto device.
Also, several crypto opcode hashes were not setting the priority value
at all.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This required a little bit of reordering of how we set up the memory
management early on.
We now only know the final values of kern_linear_pte_xor[] after we
take over the trap table and start processing TLB misses ourselves.
So once we fill those values in we re-clear the kernel's 4M TSB and
flush the TLBs. That way if we find we support larger than 4M pages
we won't have any stale smaller page size entries in the TSB.
SUN4U Panther support for larger page sizes should now be extremely
trivial but I have no hardware on which to test it and I believe
that some of the sun4u TLB miss assembler needs to be audited first
to make sure it really can handle larger than 4M PTEs properly.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On sun4v, interrogate the machine description. This code is extremely
defensive in nature, and a lot of the checks can probably be removed.
On sun4u things are a lot simpler. There are the page sizes all chips
support, and then Panther adds 32MB and 256MB pages.
Report the probed value in /proc/cpuinfo
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
SPARC-T4 supports 2GB pages.
So convert kpte_linear_bitmap into an array of 2-bit values which
index into kern_linear_pte_xor.
Now kern_linear_pte_xor is used for 4 page size aligned regions,
4MB, 256MB, 2GB, and 16GB respectively.
Enabling 2GB pages is currently hardcoded using a check against
sun4v_chip_type. In the future this will be done more cleanly
by interrogating the machine description which is the correct
way to determine this kind of thing.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some dm-crypt testing revealed several bugs in the 256-bit unrolled
loops.
The DECRYPT_256_2() macro had two errors:
1) Missing reload of KEY registers %f60 and %f62
2) Missing "\" in penultimate line of definition.
In aes_sparc64_ecb_decrypt_256, we were storing the second half of the
encryption result from the wrong source registers.
In aes_sparc64_ctr_crypt_256 we have to be careful when we fall out of
the 32-byte-at-a-time loop and handle a trailing 16-byte chunk. In
that case we've clobbered the final key holding registers and have to
restore them before executing the ENCRYPT_256() macro. Inside of the
32-byte-at-a-time loop things are OK, because we do this key register
restoring during the first few rounds of the ENCRYPT_256_2() macro.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Before:
testing speed of ctr(aes) encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 206 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 244 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 360 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 814 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5021 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 206 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 240 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 378 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 939 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6395 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 209 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 249 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 414 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1073 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7110 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of ctr(aes) decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 225 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 233 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 344 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 810 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5021 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 206 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 240 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 376 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 938 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6380 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 214 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 251 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 411 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1070 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7114 cycles (8192 bytes)
After:
testing speed of ctr(aes) encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 211 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 246 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 344 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 799 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 4975 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 210 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 236 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 365 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 888 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6055 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 209 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 255 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 404 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1010 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6669 cycles (8192 bytes)
testing speed of ctr(aes) decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 210 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 233 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 340 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 818 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 4956 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 206 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 239 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 361 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 888 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5996 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 214 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 248 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 395 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1010 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6664 cycles (8192 bytes)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Before:
testing speed of ecb(aes) decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 223 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 230 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 325 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 719 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 4266 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 211 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 234 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 353 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 808 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5344 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 214 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 243 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 393 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 939 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6039 cycles (8192 bytes)
After:
testing speed of ecb(aes) decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 226 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 231 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 313 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 681 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 3964 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 205 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 240 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 341 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 770 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5050 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 216 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 250 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 371 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 869 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5494 cycles (8192 bytes)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The AES opcodes have a 3 cycle latency, so by doing 32-bytes at a
time we avoid a pipeline bubble in between every round.
For the 256-bit key case, it looks like we're doing more work in
order to reload the KEY registers during the loop to make space
for scarce temporaries. But the load dual issues with the AES
operations so we get the KEY reloads essentially for free.
Before:
testing speed of ecb(aes) encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 264 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 231 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 329 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 715 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 4248 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 221 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 234 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 359 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 803 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5366 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 209 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 255 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 379 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 938 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6041 cycles (8192 bytes)
After:
testing speed of ecb(aes) encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 266 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 256 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 305 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 676 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 3981 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 210 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 233 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 340 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 766 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5136 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 206 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 268 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 368 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 890 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 5718 cycles (8192 bytes)
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Instead of testing and branching off of the key size on every
encrypt/decrypt call, use method ops assigned at key set time.
Reverse the order of float registers used for decryption to make
future changes easier.
Align all assembler routines on a 32-byte boundary.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Describe how we support two types of PMU setups, one with a single control
register and two counters stored in a single register, and another with
one control register per counter and each counter living in it's own
register.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When cpuc->n_events is zero, we actually don't do anything and we just
write the cpuc->pcr[0] value as-is without any modifications.
The "pcr = 0;" assignment there was just useless and confusing.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Make the per-cpu pcr save area an array instead of one u64.
Describe how many PCR and PIC registers the chip has in the sparc_pmu
descriptor.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Starting with SPARC-T4 we have a seperate PCR control register
for each performance counter, and there are absolutely no
restrictions on what events can run on which counters.
Add flags that we can use to elide the conflict and dependency
logic used to handle older chips.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We assumed PCR_PIC_PRIV can always be used to disable it, but that
won't be true for SPARC-T4.
This allows us also to get rid of some messy defines used in only
one location.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
And, like for the PCR, allow indexing of different PIC register
numbers.
This also removes all of the non-__KERNEL__ bits from asm/perfctr.h,
nothing kernel side should include it any more.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
