1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2025-03-06 20:59:54 +01:00
Commit graph

19 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tzu-En Huang
479c4ee931 rtw88: add dynamic cck pd mechanism
This mechanism reduces the numbers of false alram in cck rate by
dynamically adjusting the value of power threshold and cs_ratio.
We determine the new value by three factors, which are rssi, false alarm
count and igi. Based on these factors, we define the current condition
into five levels. Compared to the previous level, if the level is changed,
we set the new values for power threshold and cs_ratio.

Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-09-13 18:03:21 +03:00
Tzu-En Huang
5227c2ee45 rtw88: 8822c: add SW DPK support
Power amplifiers are not linear components, and require DPK to
reduce its nonlinearity. DPK is called Digital Pre-distortion
Calibration, can be used to compensate the output of power.

DPK tracking is in charge of tracking the thermal changes. And
it then shifts the power curve accordingly, which makes the
power output remains linear even if the PA works in different
temperature.

To perform DPK, the parameter table should also be updated.
And the table will be applied when device is powered on.
Then DPK will reference the values to calibrate.

Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-09-13 18:03:19 +03:00
Brian Norris
3457f86da6 rtw88: use txpwr_lmt_cfg_pair struct, not arrays
We're just trusting that these tables are of the right dimensions, when
we could do better by just using the struct directly. Let's expose the
struct txpwr_lmt_cfg_pair instead.

The table changes were made by using some Vim macros, so that should
help prevent any translation mistakes along the way.

Remaining work: get the 'void *data' out of the generic struct
rtw_table; all of these tables really deserve to be their own data
structure, with proper type fields.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-08-06 15:24:53 +03:00
Zong-Zhe Yang
b741422218 rtw88: refine flow to get tx power index
Add a structure for power parameters including base,
offset, limit and a function to get tx power parameters.
Then, refine flow to get tx power index through the
function.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:29 +03:00
Tzu-En Huang
0d350f0a91 rtw88: remove all RTW_MAX_POWER_INDEX macro
Since this macro definition has different values in different chipset,
the current defined macro value is for 8822b. This will cause the
settings of 8822c be incorrect.
Remove RTW_MAX_POWER_INDEX and use max_power_index in struct rtw_chip_info
to make sure the value of different chipset is right.

Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:28 +03:00
Zong-Zhe Yang
93f68a865f rtw88: correct power limit selection
If phy rate is decreased, sub bandwidth may be chosen by RA.
We consider possible power limits and apply the min one;
otherwise, the tx power index may be larger than spec.

And we cross-reference power limits of vht and ht with
20/40M bandwidth in 5G to avoid values are not assigned.

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:26 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
adf3c676d1 rtw88: choose the lowest as world-wide power limit
When we are loading tx power limit from the power limit table, compare
the world-wide limit with the current limit and choose the lowest power
limit for the world-wide power settings.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:25 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
764038160a rtw88: fix incorrect tx power limit at 5G
Tx power limit is stored separately by 2G and 5G.
But driver did not get tx power limit from 5G and causes incorrect tx
power. Check if the channel is beyond 2G and get the corresponding tx
power limit.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:25 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
522801493e rtw88: remove unused variable
The orig variable is taken but not used, remove it

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:24 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
43712199e0 rtw88: unify prefixes for tx power setting routine
Rename the function names to make them have the same prefix "rtw_phy"
for the tx power setting routines. Only the function names and
corresponding identation are modified.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:23 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
226746fd12 rtw88: do not use (void *) as argument
The type change from (void *) to (struct rtw_dev *) is redundant.
Just pass the right type and compiler can check that for us.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:22 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
fa6dfe6bff rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines
Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
their declaration in header file phy.h.

After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them static.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-27 20:24:21 +03:00
David S. Miller
a8b7910523 wireless-drivers-next patches for 5.3
First set of patches for 5.3, but not that many patches this time.
 
 This pull request fails to compile with the tip tree due to
 ktime_get_boot_ns() API changes there. It should be easy for Linus to
 fix it in p54 driver once he pulls this, an example resolution here:
 
 https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625160432.533aa140@canb.auug.org.au
 
 Major changes:
 
 airo
 
 * switch to use skcipher interface
 
 p54
 
 * support boottime in scan results
 
 rtw88
 
 * add fast xmit support
 
 * add random mac address on scan support
 
 rt2x00
 
 * add software watchdog to detect hangs, it's disabled by default
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJdE5OGAAoJEG4XJFUm622bWCoH/1bLdkTYOkSatXxpHn2cVRvA
 SrQ+ZSfOWJe5d0B+9HWhO5r+Savuu+IrgcC6vSIBBVglF5Tf6F0DAxHVrIwc9MSY
 QUv4f1suqeH0ipUEBWJXoDXM2OEShvw5WCuY0ZnYw2hZRI7Sb5nqwJEUH57BtBCX
 tFW22Ax3ZFTmCfexFgiwEjmtEx6HHz/nleYLMt9gg7X1Twug+QmhEsNw/27PfvMx
 RyVyCJ1UvW2x4GHqDRlGxQoh7FlMvuVe/v/VcjGp2Fp8s7GS0xUyA11svGBFpdnT
 K94Y3LOcTSdBQwScbn6O2v6EybB9PZYhg6rckwbMgIN2pkkWqXnh5avru4U0T9k=
 =yq6Q
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'wireless-drivers-next-for-davem-2019-06-26' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next

Kalle Valu says:

====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for 5.3

First set of patches for 5.3, but not that many patches this time.

This pull request fails to compile with the tip tree due to
ktime_get_boot_ns() API changes there. It should be easy for Linus to
fix it in p54 driver once he pulls this, an example resolution here:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625160432.533aa140@canb.auug.org.au

Major changes:

airo

* switch to use skcipher interface

p54

* support boottime in scan results

rtw88

* add fast xmit support

* add random mac address on scan support

rt2x00

* add software watchdog to detect hangs, it's disabled by default
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-06-26 10:12:17 -07:00
Chien-Hsun Liao
818d46e771 rtw88: 8822c: add rf write protection when switching channel
Collision of writing rf registers could occur if the driver writes
rf registers by direct write while the hardware is writing other rf
registers by pi write simultaneously.

Hardware pi write can be triggered by rf calibrations sometimes, so
the driver can not always write rf registers by direct write
protection. Direct write protection can make sure that there is no
hardware pi write during the direct write.

According to some experiments, if we add direct write protection
when switching channel, the performance of rf calibration will not
be affected.

Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-25 08:08:55 +03:00
YueHaibing
6aca09771d rtw88: Make some symbols static
Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:851:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_cck_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:852:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ofdm_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:853:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:854:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:855:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:856:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_c2h_cmd_handle_ext' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:50:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_send_h2c_command' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-28 14:41:47 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
a24bad7473 rtw88: fix unassigned rssi_level in rtw_sta_info
The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will
never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the
rssi level

If a wrong RA mask is chosen, the firmware will pick some *bad rates*.
The most hurtful scene will be in *noisy environment*, such as office or
public area with many APs and users.
The latency would be high and the overall throughput would be only half
or less.

Tested in 2.4G in office area, with this patch the throughput increased
from such as "1x Mbps -> 4x Mbps".

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-28 14:30:05 +03:00
Stanislaw Gruszka
8a03447dd3 rtw88: fix subscript above array bounds compiler warning
My compiler complains about:

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:430:26: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
  linear = db_invert_table[i][j];

According to comment power_db should be in range 1 ~ 96 .
To fix add check for boundaries before access the array.

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-28 14:29:30 +03:00
Gustavo A. R. Silva
aa8eaaaa12 rtw88: phy: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_get_channel_group’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
  unlikely(__ret_warn_on);     \
  ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:907:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
   WARN_ON(1);
   ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:908:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/bcd.h:5,
                 from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:5:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘phy_get_2g_tx_power_index’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
  unlikely(__ret_warn_on);     \
  ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1021:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
   WARN_ON(1);
   ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1022:2: note: here
  case RTW_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20:
  ^~~~

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-02 17:58:53 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
e3037485c6 rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver
This is a new mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips.
rtw88 now supports RTL8822BE/RTL8822CE now, with basic station mode
functionalities. The firmware for both can be found at linux-firmware.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
For RTL8822BE: rtw88/rtw8822b_fw.bin
For RTL8822CE: rtw88/rtw8822c_fw.bin

And for now, only PCI buses (RTL8xxxE) are supported. We will add support
for USB and SDIO in the future. The bus interface abstraction can be seen
in this driver such as hci.h. Most of the hardware setting are the same
except for some TRX path or probing setup should be separated.

Supported:

 * Basic STA/AP/ADHOC mode, and TDLS (STA is well tested)

Missing feature:

 * WOW/PNO
 * USB & SDIO bus (such as RTL8xxxU/RTL8xxxS)
 * BT coexistence (8822B/8822C are combo ICs)
 * Multiple interfaces (for now single STA is better supported)
 * Dynamic hardware calibrations (to improve/stabilize performance)

Potential problems:

 * static calibration spends too much time, and it is painful for
   driver to leave IDLE state. And slows down associate process.
   But reload function are under development, will be added soon!
 * TRX statictics misleading, as we are not reporting status correctly,
   or say, not reporting for "every" packet.

The next patch set should have BT coexistence code since RTL8822B/C are
combo ICs, and the driver for BT can be found after Linux Kernel v4.20.
So it is better to add it first to make WiFi + BT work concurrently.

Although now rtw88 is simple but we are developing more features for it.
Even we want to add support for more chips such as RTL8821C/RTL8814B.

Finally, rtw88 has many authors, listed alphabetically:

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-30 19:43:37 +03:00