ID_MMFR4_EL1 has been missing in the CPU context (i.e cpuinfo_arm64). This
just adds the register along with other required changes.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-18-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Enable the following features bits in ID_AA64PFR1 register as per ARM DDI
0487F.a specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-12-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Enable MPAM and SEL2 features bits in ID_AA64PFR0 register as per ARM DDI
0487F.a specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-11-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
[will: Make SEL2 a NONSTRICT feature per Suzuki]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Enable TLB features bit in ID_AA64ISAR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-10-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-8-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This adds basic building blocks required for ID_MMFR5 CPU register which
provides information about the implemented memory model and memory
management support in AArch32 state. This is added per ARM DDI 0487F.a
specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-7-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This adds basic building blocks required for ID_DFR1 CPU register which
provides top level information about the debug system in AArch32 state.
We hide the register from KVM guests, as we don't emulate the 'MTPMU'
feature.
This is added per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by : Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-6-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This adds basic building blocks required for ID_PFR2 CPU register which
provides information about the AArch32 programmers model which must be
interpreted along with ID_PFR0 and ID_PFR1 CPU registers. This is added
per ARM DDI 0487F.a specification.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-5-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Double lock feature can have the following possible values.
0b0000 - Double lock implemented
0b1111 - Double lock not implemented
But in case of a conflict the safe value should be 0b1111. Hence this must
be a signed feature instead. Also change FTR_EXACT to FTR_LOWER_SAFE. While
here, fix the erroneous bit width value from 28 to 4.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-4-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed to guests. Hence lets
drop it.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
ID_ISAR0[31..28] bits are RES0 in ARMv8, Reserved/UNK in ARMv7. Currently
these bits get exposed through generic_id_ftr32[] which is not desirable.
Hence define an explicit ftr_id_isar0[] array for ID_ISAR0 register where
those bits can be hidden.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589881254-10082-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Currently there are multiple instances of parange feature width mask open
encodings while fetching it's value. Even the width mask value (0x7) itself
is not accurate. It should be (0xf) per ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1.PARange[3:0] as in
ARM ARM (0487F.a). Replace them with cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field()
which can extract given standard feature (4 bits width i.e 0xf mask) field.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589360614-1164-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This validates hypervisor capabilities like VMID width, IPA range for any
hot plug CPU against system finalized values. KVM's view of the IPA space
is used while allowing a given CPU to come up. While here, it factors out
get_vmid_bits() for general use.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589248647-22925-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Now that the kernel is built with BTI annotations enable the feature by
setting the GP bit in the stage 1 translation tables. This is done
based on the features supported by the boot CPU so that we do not need
to rewrite the translation tables.
In order to avoid potential issues on big.LITTLE systems when there are
a mix of BTI and non-BTI capable CPUs in the system when we have enabled
kernel mode BTI we change BTI to be a _STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE when we
have kernel BTI. This will prevent any CPUs that don't support BTI
being started if the boot CPU supports BTI rather than simply not using
BTI as we do when supporting BTI only in userspace. The main concern is
the possibility of BTYPE being preserved by a CPU that does not
implement BTI when a thread is migrated to it resulting in an incorrect
state which could generate an exception when the thread migrates back to
a CPU that does support BTI. If we encounter practical systems which
mix BTI and non-BTI CPUs we will need to revisit this implementation.
Since we currently do not generate landing pads in the BPF JIT we only
map the base kernel text in this way.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506195138.22086-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Merge in user support for Branch Target Identification, which narrowly
missed the cut for 5.7 after a late ABI concern.
* for-next/bti-user:
arm64: bti: Document behaviour for dynamically linked binaries
arm64: elf: Fix allnoconfig kernel build with !ARCH_USE_GNU_PROPERTY
arm64: BTI: Add Kconfig entry for userspace BTI
mm: smaps: Report arm64 guarded pages in smaps
arm64: mm: Display guarded pages in ptdump
KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping emulated instructions
arm64: traps: Shuffle code to eliminate forward declarations
arm64: unify native/compat instruction skipping
arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE
arm64: elf: Enable BTI at exec based on ELF program properties
elf: Allow arch to tweak initial mmap prot flags
arm64: Basic Branch Target Identification support
ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support
ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties
When a feature register field is omitted from the description of the
register, the corresponding bits are treated as STRICT RES0, including
for KVM guests. This is subtly different to declaring the field as
HIDDEN/STRICT/EXACT/0, so update the comment to call this out.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Now that Suzuki isn't within throwing distance, I thought I'd better add
a rough overview comment to cpufeature.c so that it doesn't take me days
to remember how it works next time.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-9-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We don't need to be quite as strict about mismatched AArch32 support,
which is good because the friendly hardware folks have been busy
mismatching this to their hearts' content.
* We don't care about EL2 or EL3 (there are silly comments concerning
the latter, so remove those)
* EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 capability and handled
gracefully when a mismatch occurs
* EL0 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability and handled
gracefully when a mismatch occurs
Relax the AArch32 checks to FTR_NONSTRICT.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-8-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
If AArch32 is not supported at EL1, the AArch32 feature register fields
no longer advertise support for some system features:
* ISAR4.SMC
* PFR1.{Virt_frac, Sec_frac, Virtualization, Security, ProgMod}
In which case, we don't need to emit "SANITY CHECK" failures for all of
them.
Add logic to relax the strictness of individual feature register fields
at runtime and use this for the fields above if 32-bit EL1 is not
supported.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-7-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
update_cpu_features() is pretty large, so split out the checking of the
AArch32 features into a separate function and call it after checking the
AArch64 features.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-6-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
There's no need to call id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0() twice because the
sanitised value of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 has already been updated for the CPU
being onlined.
Remove the redundant function call.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-5-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Although we emit a "SANITY CHECK" warning and taint the kernel if we
detect a CPU mismatch for AArch32 support at EL1, we still online the
CPU with disastrous consequences for any running 32-bit VMs.
Introduce a capability for AArch32 support at EL1 so that late onlining
of incompatible CPUs is forbidden.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-4-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In preparation for runtime updates to the strictness of some AArch32
features, spell out the register fields for ID_ISAR4 and ID_PFR1 to make
things clearer to read. Note that this isn't functionally necessary, as
the feature arrays themselves are not modified dynamically and remain
'const'.
Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-3-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We don't care if IESB is supported or not as we always set
SCTLR_ELx.IESB and, if it works, that's really great.
Relax the ID_AA64MMFR2.IESB cpufeature check so that we don't warn and
taint if it's mismatched.
[will: rewrote commit message]
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421142922.18950-2-will@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
* for-next/memory-hotremove:
: Memory hot-remove support for arm64
arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove
arm64/mm: Hold memory hotplug lock while walking for kernel page table dump
* for-next/arm_sdei:
: SDEI: fix double locking on return from hibernate and clean-up
firmware: arm_sdei: clean up sdei_event_create()
firmware: arm_sdei: Use cpus_read_lock() to avoid races with cpuhp
firmware: arm_sdei: fix possible double-lock on hibernate error path
firmware: arm_sdei: fix double-lock on hibernate with shared events
* for-next/amu:
: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support
clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: validate arch_timer_rate
arm64: use activity monitors for frequency invariance
cpufreq: add function to get the hardware max frequency
Documentation: arm64: document support for the AMU extension
arm64/kvm: disable access to AMU registers from kvm guests
arm64: trap to EL1 accesses to AMU counters from EL0
arm64: add support for the AMU extension v1
* for-next/final-cap-helper:
: Introduce cpus_have_final_cap_helper(), migrate arm64 KVM to it
arm64: kvm: hyp: use cpus_have_final_cap()
arm64: cpufeature: add cpus_have_final_cap()
* for-next/cpu_ops-cleanup:
: cpu_ops[] access code clean-up
arm64: Introduce get_cpu_ops() helper function
arm64: Rename cpu_read_ops() to init_cpu_ops()
arm64: Declare ACPI parking protocol CPU operation if needed
* for-next/misc:
: Various fixes and clean-ups
arm64: define __alloc_zeroed_user_highpage
arm64/kernel: Simplify __cpu_up() by bailing out early
arm64: remove redundant blank for '=' operator
arm64: kexec_file: Fixed code style.
arm64: add blank after 'if'
arm64: fix spelling mistake "ca not" -> "cannot"
arm64: entry: unmask IRQ in el0_sp()
arm64: efi: add efi-entry.o to targets instead of extra-$(CONFIG_EFI)
arm64: csum: Optimise IPv6 header checksum
arch/arm64: fix typo in a comment
arm64: remove gratuitious/stray .ltorg stanzas
arm64: Update comment for ASID() macro
arm64: mm: convert cpu_do_switch_mm() to C
arm64: fix NUMA Kconfig typos
* for-next/perf:
: arm64 perf updates
arm64: perf: Add support for ARMv8.5-PMU 64-bit counters
KVM: arm64: limit PMU version to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1
arm64: cpufeature: Extract capped perfmon fields
arm64: perf: Clean up enable/disable calls
perf: arm-ccn: Use scnprintf() for robustness
arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
arm64: perf: Refactor PMU init callbacks
perf: arm_spe: Remove unnecessary zero check on 'nr_pages'
When the kernel is compiled with pointer auth instructions, the boot CPU
needs to start using address auth very early, so change the cpucap to
account for this.
Pointer auth must be enabled before we call C functions, because it is
not possible to enter a function with pointer auth disabled and exit it
with pointer auth enabled. Note, mismatches between architected and
IMPDEF algorithms will still be caught by the cpufeature framework (the
separate *_ARCH and *_IMP_DEF cpucaps).
Note the change in behavior: if the boot CPU has address auth and a
late CPU does not, then the late CPU is parked by the cpufeature
framework. This is possible as kernel will only have NOP space intructions
for PAC so such mismatched late cpu will silently ignore those
instructions in C functions. Also, if the boot CPU does not have address
auth and the late CPU has then the late cpu will still boot but with
ptrauth feature disabled.
Leave generic authentication as a "system scope" cpucap for now, since
initially the kernel will only use address authentication.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: Re-worked ptrauth setup logic, comments]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Each system capability can be of either boot, local, or system scope,
depending on when the state of the capability is finalized. When we
detect a conflict on a late CPU, we either offline the CPU or panic the
system. We currently always panic if the conflict is caused by a boot
scope capability, and offline the CPU if the conflict is caused by a
local or system scope capability.
We're going to want to add a new capability (for pointer authentication)
which needs to be boot scope but doesn't need to panic the system when a
conflict is detected. So add a new flag to specify whether the
capability requires the system to panic or not. Current boot scope
capabilities are updated to set the flag, so there should be no
functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
These helpers are used only by functions inside cpufeature.c and
hence makes sense to be moved from cpufeature.h to cpufeature.c as
they are not expected to be used globally.
This change helps in reducing the header file size as well as to add
future cpu capability types without confusion. Only a cpu capability
type macro is sufficient to expose those capabilities globally.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To enable pointer auth for the kernel, we're going to need to check for
the presence of address auth and generic auth using alternative_if. We
currently have two cpucaps for each, but alternative_if needs to check a
single cpucap. So define meta-capabilities that are present when either
of the current two capabilities is present.
Leave the existing four cpucaps in place, as they are still needed to
check for mismatched systems where one CPU has the architected algorithm
but another has the IMP DEF algorithm.
Note, the meta-capabilities were present before but were removed in
commit a56005d321 ("arm64: cpufeature: Reduce number of pointer auth
CPU caps from 6 to 4") and commit 1e013d0612 ("arm64: cpufeature: Rework
ptr auth hwcaps using multi_entry_cap_matches"), as they were not needed
then. Note, unlike before, the current patch checks the cpucap values
directly, instead of reading the CPU ID register value.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
[Amit: commit message and macro rebase, use __system_matches_cap]
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Some existing/future meta cpucaps match need the presence of individual
cpucaps. Currently the individual cpucaps checks it via an array based
flag and this introduces dependency on the array entry order.
This limitation exists only for system scope cpufeature.
This patch introduces an internal helper function (__system_matches_cap)
to invoke the matching handler for system scope. This helper has to be
used during a narrow window when,
- The system wide safe registers are set with all the SMP CPUs and,
- The SYSTEM_FEATURE cpu_hwcaps may not have been set.
Normal users should use the existing cpus_have_{const_}cap() global
function.
Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
remove redundant blank for '=' operator, it may be more elegant.
Signed-off-by: hankecai <hankecai@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This patch adds the bare minimum required to expose the ARMv8.5
Branch Target Identification feature to userspace.
By itself, this does _not_ automatically enable BTI for any initial
executable pages mapped by execve(). This will come later, but for
now it should be possible to enable BTI manually on those pages by
using mprotect() from within the target process.
Other arches already using the generic mman.h are already using
0x10 for arch-specific prot flags, so we use that for PROT_BTI
here.
For consistency, signal handler entry points in BTI guarded pages
are required to be annotated as such, just like any other function.
This blocks a relatively minor attack vector, but comforming
userspace will have the annotations anyway, so we may as well
enforce them.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is providing a frequency
scaling correction factor that helps achieve more accurate
load-tracking.
So far, for arm and arm64 platforms, this scale factor has been
obtained based on the ratio between the current frequency and the
maximum supported frequency recorded by the cpufreq policy. The
setting of this scale factor is triggered from cpufreq drivers by
calling arch_set_freq_scale. The current frequency used in computation
is the frequency requested by a governor, but it may not be the
frequency that was implemented by the platform.
This correction factor can also be obtained using a core counter and a
constant counter to get information on the performance (frequency based
only) obtained in a period of time. This will more accurately reflect
the actual current frequency of the CPU, compared with the alternative
implementation that reflects the request of a performance level from
the OS.
Therefore, implement arch_scale_freq_tick to use activity monitors, if
present, for the computation of the frequency scale factor.
The use of AMU counters depends on:
- CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN - depents on the AMU extension being present
- CONFIG_CPU_FREQ - the current frequency obtained using counter
information is divided by the maximum frequency obtained from the
cpufreq policy.
While it is possible to have a combination of CPUs in the system with
and without support for activity monitors, the use of counters for
frequency invariance is only enabled for a CPU if all related CPUs
(CPUs in the same frequency domain) support and have enabled the core
and constant activity monitor counters. In this way, there is a clear
separation between the policies for which arch_set_freq_scale (cpufreq
based FIE) is used, and the policies for which arch_scale_freq_tick
(counter based FIE) is used to set the frequency scale factor. For
this purpose, a late_initcall_sync is registered to trigger validation
work for policies that will enable or disable the use of AMU counters
for frequency invariance. If CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is not defined, the use
of counters is enabled on all CPUs only if all possible CPUs correctly
support the necessary counters.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The activity monitors extension is an optional extension introduced
by the ARMv8.4 CPU architecture. This implements basic support for
version 1 of the activity monitors architecture, AMUv1.
This support includes:
- Extension detection on each CPU (boot, secondary, hotplugged)
- Register interface for AMU aarch64 registers
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Expose the ID_AA64ISAR0.RNDR field to userspace, as the RNG system
registers are always available at EL0.
Implement arch_get_random_seed_long using RNDR. Given that the
TRNG is likely to be a shared resource between cores, and VMs,
do not explicitly force re-seeding with RNDRRS. In order to avoid
code complexity and potential issues with hetrogenous systems only
provide values after cpufeature has finalized the system capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
[Modified to only function after cpufeature has finalized the system
capabilities and move all the code into the header -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
[will: Advertise HWCAP via /proc/cpuinfo]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Rather than open-code the extraction of the E0PD field from the MMFR2
register, we can use the cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field() helper
instead.
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Now that the decision to use non-global mappings is stored in a variable,
the check to avoid enabling them for the terminally broken ThunderX1
platform can be simplified so that it is only keyed off the MIDR value.
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Refactor the code which checks to see if we need to use non-global
mappings to use a variable instead of checking with the CPU capabilities
each time, doing the initial check for KPTI early in boot before we
start allocating memory so we still avoid transitioning to non-global
mappings in common cases.
Since this variable always matches our decision about non-global
mappings this means we can also combine arm64_kernel_use_ng_mappings()
and arm64_unmap_kernel_at_el0() into a single function, the variable
simply stores the result and the decision code is elsewhere. We could
just have the users check the variable directly but having a function
makes it clear that these uses are read-only.
The result is that we simplify the code a bit and reduces the amount of
code executed at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In preparation for integrating E0PD support with KASLR factor out the
checks for interaction between KASLR and KPTI done in boot context into
a new function kaslr_requires_kpti(), in the process clarifying the
distinction between what we do in boot context and what we do at
runtime.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI) is used to mitigate some speculation
based security issues by ensuring that the kernel is not mapped when
userspace is running but this approach is expensive and is incompatible
with SPE. E0PD, introduced in the ARMv8.5 extensions, provides an
alternative to this which ensures that accesses from userspace to the
kernel's half of the memory map to always fault with constant time,
preventing timing attacks without requiring constant unmapping and
remapping or preventing legitimate accesses.
Currently this feature will only be enabled if all CPUs in the system
support E0PD, if some CPUs do not support the feature at boot time then
the feature will not be enabled and in the unlikely event that a late
CPU is the first CPU to lack the feature then we will reject that CPU.
This initial patch does not yet integrate with KPTI, this will be dealt
with in followup patches. Ideally we could ensure that by default we
don't use KPTI on CPUs where E0PD is present.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
[will: Fixed typo in Kconfig text]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As the Kconfig syntax gained support for $(as-instr) tests, move the LSE
gas support detection from Makefile to the main arm64 Kconfig and remove
the additional CONFIG_AS_LSE definition and check.
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Tested-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This adds basic building blocks required for ID_ISAR6 CPU register which
identifies support for various instruction implementation on AArch32 state.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
[will: Ensure SPECRES is treated the same as on A64]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Export the features introduced as part of ARMv8.6 exposed in the
ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 and ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 registers. This introduces the
Matrix features (ARMv8.2-I8MM, ARMv8.2-F64MM and ARMv8.2-F32MM) along
with BFloat16 (Armv8.2-BF16), speculation invalidation (SPECRES) and
Data Gathering Hint (ARMv8.0-DGH).
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
[Added other features in those registers]
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
[will: Don't advertise SPECRES to userspace]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We set the compat_elf_hwcap bits unconditionally on arm64 to
include the VFP and NEON support. However, the FP/SIMD unit
is optional on Arm v8 and thus could be missing. We already
handle this properly in the kernel, but still advertise to
the COMPAT applications that the VFP is available. Fix this
to make sure we only advertise when we really have them.
Fixes: 82e0191a1a ("arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD")
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The NO_FPSIMD capability is defined with scope SYSTEM, which implies
that the "absence" of FP/SIMD on at least one CPU is detected only
after all the SMP CPUs are brought up. However, we use the status
of this capability for every context switch. So, let us change
the scope to LOCAL_CPU to allow the detection of this capability
as and when the first CPU without FP is brought up.
Also, the current type allows hotplugged CPU to be brought up without
FP/SIMD when all the current CPUs have FP/SIMD and we have the userspace
up. Fix both of these issues by changing the capability to
BOOT_RESTRICTED_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE.
Fixes: 82e0191a1a ("arm64: Support systems without FP/ASIMD")
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We finalize the system wide capabilities after the SMP CPUs
are booted by the kernel. This is used as a marker for deciding
various checks in the kernel. e.g, sanity check the hotplugged
CPUs for missing mandatory features.
However there is no explicit helper available for this in the
kernel. There is sys_caps_initialised, which is not exposed.
The other closest one we have is the jump_label arm64_const_caps_ready
which denotes that the capabilities are set and the capability checks
could use the individual jump_labels for fast path. This is
performed before setting the ELF Hwcaps, which must be checked
against the new CPUs. We also perform some of the other initialization
e.g, SVE setup, which is important for the use of FP/SIMD
where SVE is supported. Normally userspace doesn't get to run
before we finish this. However the in-kernel users may
potentially start using the neon mode. So, we need to
reject uses of neon mode before we are set. Instead of defining
a new marker for the completion of SVE setup, we could simply
reuse the arm64_const_caps_ready and enable it once we have
finished all the setup. Also we could expose this to the
various users as "system_capabilities_finalized()" to make
it more meaningful than "const_caps_ready".
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
