This moves the generic tracking into the drivers and protects
against reentrancy in the drivers. It fixes up radeon and agp
to be able to query the bound status as that is required.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200917043040.146575-2-airlied@gmail.com
This adds 2 getters and 4 setters, however unbound and populated
are currently the same thing, this will change, it also drops
a BUG_ON that seems not that useful.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200915024007.67163-2-airlied@gmail.com
Add comments to refect what function does
Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <Oak.Zeng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Konig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Instead of letting TTM make an educated guess based on
some mask all drivers should just specify what caching
they want for their CPU mappings.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/390207/
As far as I can tell this was never used either and we just
always fallback to the order cached > wc > uncached anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/390142/
It's not supported to specify more than one of those flags.
So it never made sense to make this a flag in the first place.
Nuke the flags and specify directly which memory type to use.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/389826/?series=81551&rev=1
UAPI Changes:
None
Cross-subsystem Changes:
* Moves a bunch of miscellaneous DP code from the i915 driver into a set
of shared DRM DP helpers
Core Changes:
* New DRM DP helpers (see above)
Driver Changes:
* Implements usage of the aforementioned DP helpers in the nouveau
driver, along with some other various HPD related cleanup for nouveau
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/11e59ebdea7ee4f46803a21fe9b21443d2b9c401.camel@redhat.com
This pattern is cut-n-pasted across 4 drivers, switch it to
a WARN_ON instead, as BUG_ON is considered a bad idea usually.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200907204630.1406528-2-airlied@gmail.com
This is used by TTM to communicate the physical address
which should be used with ioremap(), ioremap_wc(). We don't
need to separate the base and offset in any way here.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/389457/
Add a static inline adev_to_drm() to obtain
the DRM device pointer from an amdgpu_device pointer.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Get the amdgpu_device from the DRM device by use
of an inline function, drm_to_adev(). The inline
function resolves a pointer to struct drm_device
to a pointer to struct amdgpu_device.
v2: Use a typed visible static inline function
instead of an invisible macro.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
if other threads have holden the reset lock, recovery will
fail to try_lock. Therefore we introduce atomic hive->in_reset
and adev->in_gpu_reset, to avoid reentering GPU recovery.
v2:
drop "? true : false" in the definition of amdgpu_in_reset
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Remove DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW, as it was used
in only one place.
Rename and separate by a line
DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MAX to DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT
as it represents a (total) count of said
priorities and it is used as such in loops
throughout the code. (0-based indexing is the
the count number.)
Remove redundant word HIGH in priority names,
and rename *KERNEL* to *HIGH*, as it really
means that, high.
v2: Add back KERNEL and remove SW and HW,
in lieu of a single HIGH between NORMAL and KERNEL.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The whole approach wasn't thought through till the end.
We already had a reset lock like this in the past and it caused the same problems like this one.
Completely revert the patch for now and add individual trylock protection to the hardware access functions as necessary.
This reverts commit df9c8d1aa2.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Backmerging drm-next into drm-misc-next for nouveau and panel updates.
Resolves a conflict between ttm and nouveau, where struct ttm_mem_res got
renamed to struct ttm_resource.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
We need to allocate that manually now.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/384330/
This name better reflects what the object does. I didn't rename
all the pointers it seemed too messy.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200804025632.3868079-60-airlied@gmail.com
It's related to the memory manager so move it there.
v2: inline the structure
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It's related to the memory manager so move it there.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It's more related to memory management than memory
controller.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We never use them.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This will allow us to split the allocation for systems
where we have to keep the stolen memory around to avoid
S3 issues. This way we don't waste as much memory and
still avoid any screen artifacts during the bios to
driver transition.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Rather than leaving this as a gmc v9 specific hack.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Since that is where we store the other data related to
the stolen vga memory.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Should be functionally the same since nothing else is
allocated at that point, but let's be exact.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
It is a very strange concept to call a function which just
calls back the caller for the functions parameters.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/382085/
Instead just initialize the memory type parameters
before calling ttm_bo_init_mm.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/382084/
Instead use a boolean field in the memory manager structure.
Also invert the meaning of the field since the use of a TT
structure is the special case here.
v2: cleanup zero init.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/382079/
Instead of repeating that in each driver.
v2: keep the caching limitation for VMWGFX for now.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/382078/
