1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2025-03-06 20:59:54 +01:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ism Hong
9a7e8ec0d4
riscv: perf: Fix callchain parse error with kernel tracepoint events
For RISC-V, when tracing with tracepoint events, the IP and status are
set to 0, preventing the perf code parsing the callchain and resolving
the symbols correctly.

 ./ply 'tracepoint:kmem/kmem_cache_alloc { @[stack]=count(); }'
 @:
 { <STACKID4294967282> }: 1

The fix is to implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs for riscv, which
fills several necessary registers used for callchain unwinding,
including epc, sp, s0 and status. It's similar to commit b3eac0265b
("arm: perf: Fix callchain parse error with kernel tracepoint events")
and commit 5b09a094f2 ("arm64: perf: Fix callchain parse error with
kernel tracepoint events").

With this patch, callchain can be parsed correctly as:

 ./ply 'tracepoint:kmem/kmem_cache_alloc { @[stack]=count(); }'
 @:
 {
         __traceiter_kmem_cache_alloc+68
         __traceiter_kmem_cache_alloc+68
         kmem_cache_alloc+354
         __sigqueue_alloc+94
         __send_signal_locked+646
         send_signal_locked+154
         do_send_sig_info+84
         __kill_pgrp_info+130
         kill_pgrp+60
         isig+150
         n_tty_receive_signal_char+36
         n_tty_receive_buf_standard+2214
         n_tty_receive_buf_common+280
         n_tty_receive_buf2+26
         tty_ldisc_receive_buf+34
         tty_port_default_receive_buf+62
         flush_to_ldisc+158
         process_one_work+458
         worker_thread+138
         kthread+178
         riscv_cpufeature_patch_func+832
  }: 1

Signed-off-by: Ism Hong <ism.hong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601095355.1168910-1-ism.hong@gmail.com
Fixes: 178e9fc47a ("perf: riscv: preliminary RISC-V support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2023-06-01 10:09:22 -07:00
Atish Patra
9dc6ce8021
RISC-V: Remove the current perf implementation
The current perf implementation in RISC-V is not very useful as it can not
count any events other than cycle/instructions. Moreover, perf record
can not be used or the events can not be started or stopped.

Remove the implementation now for a better platform driver in future
that will implement most of the missing functionality.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-03-21 14:58:12 -07:00
Kefeng Wang
48084c3595
riscv: perf: RISCV_BASE_PMU should be independent
Selecting PERF_EVENTS without selecting RISCV_BASE_PMU results in a build
error.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
[Palmer: commit text]
Fixes: 178e9fc47aae("perf: riscv: preliminary RISC-V support")
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2020-05-12 16:21:46 -07:00
Björn Töpel
34bfc10a6e riscv, perf: Add arch specific perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs
RISC-V was missing a proper perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs macro for
CONFIG_PERF_EVENT builds.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-10-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:31 +01:00
Atish Patra
4c42ae4f6a
RISC-V: Fix !CONFIG_SMP compilation error
Enabling both CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS without !CONFIG_SMP
generates following compilation error.

arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h:80:2: error: expected
specifier-qualifier-list before 'irqreturn_t'

  irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~

Include interrupt.h in proper place to avoid compilation
error.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-08-13 08:31:32 -07:00
Alan Kao
178e9fc47a
perf: riscv: preliminary RISC-V support
This patch provide a basic PMU, riscv_base_pmu, which supports two
general hardware event, instructions and cycles.  Furthermore, this
PMU serves as a reference implementation to ease the portings in
the future.

riscv_base_pmu should be able to run on any RISC-V machine that
conforms to the Priv-Spec.  Note that the latest qemu model hasn't
fully support a proper behavior of Priv-Spec 1.10 yet, but work
around should be easy with very small fixes.  Please check
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/pull/115 for future updates.

Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>
Cc: Greentime Hu <greentime@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-06-04 14:02:01 -07:00