We should only allow PPAG to be enabled by OEMs that are in the
approved list. In order to do this, we need to compare the system
vendor string retrieved from SMBIOS to a list maintained in the
driver. If the vendor string is not in the list, we don't allow PPAG
to be used.
For now the list is empty, but entries will be added to it
individually, in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210131201908.c9d35b7d8748.I4e4cf61d8fa6ff91d9b0cab2b1ec9ede4be346f5@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When version 2 of the PER_PLATFORM_ANT_GAIN_CMD was implemented, we
started copying the values from the command that we have stored into a
local instance. But we accidentally forgot to copy the enabled flag,
so in practice PPAG is never really enabled. Fix this by copying the
flag from our stored data a we should.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Fixes: f2134f66f4 ("iwlwifi: acpi: support ppag table command v2")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210131201908.24d7bf754ad5.I0e8abc2b8747508b6118242533d68c856ca6dffb@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We should only collect debug data after exiting suspend state, that's
why we delete the current place in d3.c file, and add it to fwrt flows
that occur while we can still access the fw and collect debug data.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210131201908.eaf378ed403c.I46fae3ee6da1a4b476515b8ad51ad1c0ea2d8381@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Once the all the stations completed the switch, we need
to clear csa_tx_blocked_vif. This was missing. We also
need to re-enable the broadcast / multicast stations.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.f5b813753bdb.Id58979b678974c3ccf44d8b381c68165ac55a3d3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we abort the scan because of a firmware crash, we
need to cancel the delayed work that monitors the scan
completion. Otherwise it'll kick and try to restart the
firmware yet another time.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.a497faa942dd.Ibc155ad36da9de7eb0ddcdd826ddf8dd6607d2ac@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We were starting the early time-point too late in non-unified
firmwares. Unlike with unified firmwares, we were starting it only
after reading the NVM, so errors in the NVM read phase were not
logged.
Solve this by moving the time-point to the same place as we do with
unified firmwares, i.e. just before we go into the wait-alive code.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.bb6d28ceca01.I770fdf3b9b9fa555fe0935926e32cc3509d980de@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The "supp" variable doesn't need to be unsigned long, only
"tmp" is used with for_each_set_bit(). "supp" should just
be a u16, since that's how it's sent to the firmware.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.762e50704a39.I014bc7898f90c734f8e9be2a3efaf9bf8b7db6db@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
In struct iwl_tx_cmd, there's no risk (as Arnd implied) that we
might access this as an array, as it's really not an array and
cannot be - there's only a single 802.11 header per frame. The
only reason for this member is for being able to access it a
bit more nicely.
On the other hand, this structure is used as a sub-struct in a
few places, and then some compilers (e.g. clang with certain
options) complain as you shouldn't have structs with variable-
length fields embedded in other structs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.46cd538c90bf.I92179567d96938598806b560be59d787c2a8cc16@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If the firmware has support, then advertise it to the stack and
send the key down. Since we re-check the protection in the host
anyway, we don't really need to do anything on RX except that we
should drop frames that the firmware _knows_ are replay errors,
since beacon filtering might otherwise result in replays being
possible.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.f5a3d53301b3.I23e84c9bb0b039d9106a07e9d6847776757f9029@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
On devices starting from 9000 series, always allow maximum A-MSDU
sizes regardless of the amsdu_size module parameter, which really
hasn't meant that for a long time but just controls the receive
buffer size.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.ebf6efb380a9.I237be6ec70bee6ec52a2f379ee1f15b1196488d0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we check the length, we only check that the advertised
data length fits into the data we have, but currently not
that it actually matches correctly.
This should be harmless, but if the first two bytes are zero,
then the iwl_rx_packet_payload_len() ends up negative, and
that might later cause issues if unsigned variables are used,
as this is not something that's normally expected.
Change the validation here to precisely validate the lengths
match, to avoid such issues.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.5184dfc2a445.I0631d2e4f6ffb93cf06618edb035c45bd6d1d7b9@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Handling host commands in a sync way is not directly related to PCIe
transport, and can serve as common logic for any transport, so move
it to trans layer.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.fde99af4e0f7.I4cab95919eb35cc5bfb26d32dcf5e15419d0e0ef@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
In roaming flows and during reassociation, its possible that data frames
such as EAPOLs for 4 way handshake/ 802.1x authentication are initially set
to higher MCS rate. Though these are pruned down to a lower legacy rate
before sending to the FW, driver also emits a kernel warning - intended for
non-data frames. Add checks to avoid such warnings for data frames, while
also enhancing the debug data printed.
Signed-off-by: Krishnanand Prabhu <krishnanand.prabhu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.d9ded010c4ce.Ie1d5a33d7175c0bcb35c10b5729748646671da31@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
While disconnecting from the AP due to bad channel switch
params (e.g. too long Tx block), do not send the firmware
'CSA abort' before disconnecting. That causes canceling the
immediate quiet and can cause transmitting data before the
disconnection happens.
Signed-off-by: Shaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.b9af359a675f.I996fc7eb3d94e9539f8b117017c428448c42c7ad@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
D3_CONFIG_CMD and D0I3_END_CMD should be the last\first
command upon suspend\resume correspondingly, otherwise,
FW will raise an assert (0x342).
There are firmware notifications that cause the driver to
send a command back to the firmware. If such a notification
is sent to the driver while the the driver prepares the
firmware for D3, operation, what is likely to happen is that
the handling of the notification will try to get the mutex
and will wait unil the driver finished configuring the
firmware for D3. Then the handling notification will get
the mutex and handle the notification which will lead to
the aforementioned ASSERT 342.
To avoid this, we need to prevent any command to be sent to
the firmware between the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD.
Check this in the utility layer that sends the host commands
and in the transport layer as well.
Flag the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD commands as
commands that must be sent even if the firmware has already
been configured for D3 operation.
Signed-off-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.1935a993b471.I3192c93c030576ca16773c01b009c4d93610d6ea@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we want to stop TX'ing because we are suspending, we
have two options: either we check system_pm_mode or we
check the mvm's status that has a bit for the suspend
flow.
The latter is better because test_bit is atomic. Also
add a call to synchronize_net after we set the bit to
make sure that all the new Tx see the bit before we
actually complete the suspend flow.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.243c88781302.I5c0379c5a7e5d49410569e7fcd2fff7a419c6dea@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-enabling the interrupt only after
the poll completed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.a5951ac4fc06.I9c84a147288fcfb1b019572c6758f2d92949f5d7@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we
get the response and in the response we only get the updated
read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx
per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free
all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel
as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle
this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint).
When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use
only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to
avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When restarting firmware with an ongoing scheduled scan, we
don't (and shouldn't) mark it as aborted as mac80211 will be
restarting it, and so no event should go out to userspace.
The appropriate comment regarding this wasn't moved to this
place, so add it.
However, we _do_ need to clean up our internal state, since
mac80211 will restart the scan, and we'll otherwise get to
the WARN_ON() a few lines below for no reason whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4ddc9b017268.Ie869b628ae56a5d776eba0e7b7f05f42fc566f2e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
For testing features where the firmware may send some
notifications it can often be a lot easier to do that
from a test script. Remove most injection limitations
from debugfs to be able to do this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.9aff3c6b4607.I03b0ae7df094734451445ffcb7f9f0274969f1c0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We shouldn't trust the firmware with the sizes (or contents)
of notifications, accessing too much data could cause page
faults if the data doesn't fit into the allocated space. This
applies more on older NICs where multiple notifications can
be in a single RX buffer.
Add a general framework for checking a minimum size of any
notification in the RX handlers and use it for most. Some RX
handlers were already checking and I've moved the checks,
some more complex checks I left and made them _NO_SIZE for
the RX handlers.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.3e155d5e5f90.I2121fa4ac7cd7eb98970d84b793796646afa3eed@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We have already WARN_ON(!qc) for non-QOS frame on txq->sched_retry path,
but we continue to process, what makes no sense since tid is not
initialized. Non QOS frame should never happen when aggregation
is enabled on queue, so do not process that.
Patch should fix smatch warning:
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c:2822 il4965_hdl_tx() error: uninitialized symbol 'tid'.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210119100621.439134-1-stf_xl@wp.pl
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'args' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-17-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Function parameter or member 'reg_data' not described in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Excess function parameter 'reg' description in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-15-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c:97: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_phy_db'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-14-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c:340: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr '
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-9-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom_size' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
Also add documentation for 'mvm'.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment with the new
pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edd98d194bfc98b4be93a9bdc303630b719c0e66.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117155904.GA14551@embeddedor
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor
