1
0
Fork 0
mirror of synced 2025-03-06 20:59:54 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Lendacky
e9d1d2bb75 treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()
Replace uses of mem_encrypt_active() with calls to cc_platform_has() with
the CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT attribute.

Remove the implementation of mem_encrypt_active() across all arches.

For s390, since the default implementation of the cc_platform_has()
matches the s390 implementation of mem_encrypt_active(), cc_platform_has()
does not need to be implemented in s390 (the config option
ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM is not set).

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-9-bp@alien8.de
2021-10-04 11:47:24 +02:00
Thiago Jung Bauermann
5cbdaeefb6 s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function
All references to sev_active() were moved to arch/x86 so we don't need to
define it for s390 anymore.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-09 22:52:11 +10:00
Thiago Jung Bauermann
284e21fab2 x86, s390/mm: Move sme_active() and sme_me_mask to x86-specific header
Now that generic code doesn't reference them, move sme_active() and
sme_me_mask to x86's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>.

Also remove the export for sme_active() since it's only used in files that
won't be built as modules. sme_me_mask on the other hand is used in
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c (via __sme_set() and __psp_pa()) which can be built as a
module so its export needs to stay.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-09 22:52:08 +10:00
Halil Pasic
64e1f0c531 s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization
On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O
buffers.  That requires some plumbing.

Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops correctly
is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting I/O to a
non-shared page would bring.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2019-06-15 12:24:51 +02:00