The integrated So devices covered by the iwl_so_long_latency_trans_cfg
configuration should all have low-latency-xtal enabled, so do that.
While at it, remove the TODO, I've checked the other values as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: 6f60fb03c8 ("iwlwifi: move SnJ and So rules to the new tables")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211016114029.8b5480113f53.I80b5b4ebea84e56f3b3143fc1ee7097be8b4ae78@changeid
Start supporting API version 66 for AX devices.
Th iwlwifi FW API is frozen every 6 weeks, so we need to bump the
newest version number that the driver supports accordingly. In this
specific case, support for new HW will only be possible with the new
FW version. This change still keeps backwards compatibility with
older FW API versions for existing devices.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210901101412.300012-1-luca@coelho.fi
On Bz devices, the MAC address CSRs changed from 0x380 to 0x30.
Change the boolean configuration "mac_addr_from_csr" to hold the
base address instead, and set it correctly for the different
devices using this feature.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802215208.928c7983f014.Ic5ba92d98946c1b4640280a05dcfd75119c0f0c0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Add support for different combinations of Bz
and CRFs.
Note: As of now we do not know the exact values
for ltr_delay and xtal_latency, so for now use the
worst case scenario values until the actual values
are clarified.
Signed-off-by: Matti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210330162204.caac8d996532.I6a22d6decb106cd50d7954b19236b69d685dcc39@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
* Check FW notification sizes for robustness;
* Improvements in the NAPI implementation;
* Implement a workaround for CCA-EXT;
* Add new FW API support;
* Fix a CSA bug;
* Implement PHY integration version parsing;
* A bit of refactoring;
* One more CSA bug fix, this time in the AP side;
* Support for new So devices and a bit of reorg;
* Per Platform Antenna Gain (PPAG) fixes and improvements;
* Improvements in the debug framework;
* Some other clean-ups and small fixes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=c570
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'iwlwifi-next-for-kalle-2021-02-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-next
iwlwifi patches intended for v5.12
* Check FW notification sizes for robustness;
* Improvements in the NAPI implementation;
* Implement a workaround for CCA-EXT;
* Add new FW API support;
* Fix a CSA bug;
* Implement PHY integration version parsing;
* A bit of refactoring;
* One more CSA bug fix, this time in the AP side;
* Support for new So devices and a bit of reorg;
* Per Platform Antenna Gain (PPAG) fixes and improvements;
* Improvements in the debug framework;
* Some other clean-ups and small fixes.
# gpg: Signature made Fri 05 Feb 2021 12:04:21 PM EET using RSA key ID 1A3CC5FA
# gpg: Good signature from "Luciano Roth Coelho (Luca) <luca@coelho.fi>"
# gpg: aka "Luciano Roth Coelho (Intel) <luciano.coelho@intel.com>"
Add support to the 6GHz band (aka. Ultra High Band or UHB). This
allows us to scan and connect to channels in that band, including all
the relevant features, such as preferred scan channels, colocated
channels etc.
Co-developed-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000657.0fdbfc3d7352.Idb648536faf21716e2ab2c6d6890d3e49f719cd3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We were using a very high latency for all 9560 devices so they all
would have time to stabilize. But this causes the system to be
slighly slower, so we can use the best values for each device.
This requires a new trans cfg struct for devices with longer latency
and some adjustments to the other structs.
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201008181047.34392f98fdb1.I3d3db14f6d1a8ecc547ca6afce8488816bd26081@changeid
When we have 256 block-ack support, we may need to be very fast
to provide a lot of frames to the hardware to transmit, but that
cannot be guaranteed. Use a longer queue size to have more time,
and the next possible queue size is 1024 since it must be a power
of two.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200425130140.851866c7e4c4.I13fa678929431f1694fd202c1da40aa476ab70fe@changeid
