11 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
cde7851428 |
selftests/bpf: Make align selftests more robust
Align subtest is very specific and finicky about expected verifier log output and format. This is often completely unnecessary as in a bunch of situations test actually cares about var_off part of register state. But given how exact it is right now, any tiny verifier log changes can lead to align tests failures, requiring constant adjustment. This patch tries to make this a bit more robust by making logic first search for specified register and then allowing to match only portion of register state, not everything exactly. This will come handly with follow up changes to SCALAR register output disambiguation. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231011223728.3188086-4-andrii@kernel.org |
||
Daniel Borkmann
|
7be14c1c90 |
bpf: Fix __reg_bound_offset 64->32 var_off subreg propagation
Xu reports that after commit |
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
6f876e75d3 |
selftests/bpf: enhance align selftest's expected log matching
Allow to search for expected register state in all the verifier log output that's related to specified instruction number. See added comment for an example of possible situation that is happening due to a simple enhancement done in the next patch, which fixes handling of env->test_state_freq flag in state checkpointing logic. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302235015.2044271-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
4f999b7677 |
selftests/bpf: make test_align selftest more robust
test_align selftest relies on BPF verifier log emitting register states for specific instructions in expected format. Unfortunately, BPF verifier precision backtracking log interferes with such expectations. And instruction on which precision propagation happens sometimes don't output full expected register states. This does indeed look like something to be improved in BPF verifier, but is beyond the scope of this patch set. So to make test_align a bit more robust, inject few dummy R4 = R5 instructions which capture desired state of R5 and won't have precision tracking logs on them. This fixes tests until we can improve BPF verifier output in the presence of precision tracking. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104163649.121784-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
||
Mykola Lysenko
|
7df5072cc0 |
bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvements
In particular these include: 1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state 2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages 3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value) 4) Remove output of id=0 5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0 Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com |
||
Christy Lee
|
2e5766483c |
bpf: Right align verifier states in verifier logs.
Make the verifier logs more readable, print the verifier states on the corresponding instruction line. If the previous line was not a bpf instruction, then print the verifier states on its own line. Before: Validating test_pkt_access_subprog3() func#3... 86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb) 86: (bf) r6 = r2 87: R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 87: (bc) w7 = w1 88: R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 88: (bf) r1 = r6 89: R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 89: (85) call pc+9 Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping. 90: R0_w=invP(id=0) 90: (bc) w8 = w0 91: R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 91: (b7) r1 = 123 92: R1_w=invP123 92: (85) call pc+65 Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping. 93: R0=invP(id=0) After: 86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb) 86: (bf) r6 = r2 ; R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 87: (bc) w7 = w1 ; R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 88: (bf) r1 = r6 ; R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 89: (85) call pc+9 Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping. 90: R0_w=invP(id=0) 90: (bc) w8 = w0 ; R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 91: (b7) r1 = 123 ; R1_w=invP123 92: (85) call pc+65 Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping. 93: R0=invP(id=0) Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
||
|
Christy Lee
|
0f55f9ed21 |
bpf: Only print scratched registers and stack slots to verifier logs.
When printing verifier state for any log level, print full verifier state only on function calls or on errors. Otherwise, only print the registers and stack slots that were accessed. Log size differences: verif_scale_loop6 before: 234566564 verif_scale_loop6 after: 72143943 69% size reduction kfree_skb before: 166406 kfree_skb after: 55386 69% size reduction Before: 156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) 157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000 fp-16_w=00\ 000000 fp-24_w=00000000 fp-32_w=00000000 fp-40_w=00000000 fp-48_w=00000000 fp-56_w=00000000 fp-64_w=00000000 fp-72_w=00000000 fp-80_w=00000\ 000 fp-88_w=00000000 fp-96_w=00000000 fp-104_w=00000000 fp-112_w=00000000 fp-120_w=00000000 fp-128_w=00000000 fp-136_w=00000000 fp-144_w=00\ 000000 fp-152_w=00000000 fp-160_w=00000000 fp-168_w=00000000 fp-176_w=00000000 fp-184_w=00000000 fp-192_w=00000000 fp-200_w=00000000 fp-208\ _w=00000000 fp-216_w=00000000 fp-224_w=00000000 fp-232_w=00000000 fp-240_w=00000000 fp-248_w=00000000 fp-256_w=00000000 fp-264_w=00000000 f\ p-272_w=00000000 fp-280_w=00000000 fp-288_w=00000000 fp-296_w=00000000 fp-304_w=00000000 fp-312_w=00000000 fp-320_w=00000000 fp-328_w=00000\ 000 fp-336_w=00000000 fp-344_w=00000000 fp-352_w=00000000 fp-360_w=00000000 fp-368_w=00000000 fp-376_w=00000000 fp-384_w=00000000 fp-392_w=\ 00000000 fp-400_w=00000000 fp-408_w=00000000 fp-416_w=00000000 fp-424_w=00000000 fp-432_w=00000000 fp-440_w=00000000 fp-448_w=00000000 ; return skb->len; 157: (95) exit Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_constant() func#5... 158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_constant(long val) 158: (bf) r0 = r1 159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0 ; return val - 122; 159: (04) w0 += -122 160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0 ; return val - 122; 160: (95) exit Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6... 161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var) 161: (bc) w0 = w3 162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 After: 156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) 157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; return skb->len; 157: (95) exit Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_constant() func#5... 158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_constant(long val) 158: (bf) r0 = r1 159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) ; return val - 122; 159: (04) w0 += -122 160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return val - 122; 160: (95) exit Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6... 161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var) 161: (bc) w0 = w3 162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R3=invP(id=0) Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-2-christylee@fb.com |
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
d8e86407e5 |
selftests/bpf: Convert legacy prog load APIs to bpf_prog_load()
Convert all the uses of legacy low-level BPF program loading APIs (mostly bpf_load_program_xattr(), but also some bpf_verify_program()) to bpf_prog_load() uses. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-10-andrii@kernel.org |
||
Jean-Philippe Brucker
|
3615bdf6d9 |
selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test
The verifier trace changed following a bugfix. After checking the 64-bit sign, only the upper bit mask is known, not bit 31. Update the test accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
||
Alexei Starovoitov
|
75748837b7 |
bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.
The llvm register allocator may use two different registers representing the same virtual register. In such case the following pattern can be observed: 1047: (bf) r9 = r6 1048: (a5) if r6 < 0x1000 goto pc+1 1050: ... 1051: (a5) if r9 < 0x2 goto pc+66 1052: ... 1053: (bf) r2 = r9 /* r2 needs to have upper and lower bounds */ This is normal behavior of greedy register allocator. The slides 137+ explain why regalloc introduces such register copy: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/slides/Yatsina-LLVM%20Greedy%20Register%20Allocator.pdf There is no way to tell llvm 'not to do this'. Hence the verifier has to recognize such patterns. In order to track this information without backtracking allocate ID for scalars in a similar way as it's done for find_good_pkt_pointers(). When the verifier encounters r9 = r6 assignment it will assign the same ID to both registers. Later if either register range is narrowed via conditional jump propagate the register state into the other register. Clear register ID in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() for any alu instruction. The register ID is ignored for scalars in regsafe() and doesn't affect state pruning. mark_reg_unknown() clears the ID. It's used to process call, endian and other instructions. Hence ID is explicitly cleared only in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and in 32-bit mov. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com |
||
Stanislav Fomichev
|
3b09d27cc9 |
selftests/bpf: Move test_align under test_progs
There is a much higher chance we can see the regressions if the test is part of test_progs. Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200515194904.229296-2-sdf@google.com |
Renamed from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c (Browse further)